Cited by 96Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations

Open access
Gluhareva, Daria, Prieto, Pilar·2017·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

Recent research has shown that beat gestures (hand gestures that co-occur with speech in spontaneous discourse) are temporally integrated with prosodic prominence and that they help word memorization and discourse comprehension. However, little is known about the potential beneficial effects of beat gestures in second language (L2) pronunciation learning. This study investigates the impact of beat gesture observation on the acquisition of native-like speech patterns in English by examining the effect of a brief training with or without beat gestures on participants’ ratings of accentedness. In a within-participants, pre-/post-test design, participants (undergraduate students learning English as a foreign language) watched a training video in which an L2 instructor gave spontaneous responses to discourse prompts. The prompts belonged to one of two categories (easy and difficult), and were presented by the instructor either with or without accompanying beat gestures. Participants’ own answers to the prompts were recorded before and after training and evaluated by five native speaker judges. The results of the comparison between the participants’ pre-training and post-training speech samples demonstrated that beat gesture training significantly improved the participants’ accentedness ratings on the set of difficult (more discourse-demanding) items. The results of the study support the role of beat gestures as highlighters of rhythmic information and have implications for pronunc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168816651463

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gluhareva, D., & Prieto, P.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Gluhareva, Daria
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2016-06-08
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
609-631
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2410458240
Cited by
96
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (acceptedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (2014SGR-925)
  • Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (MINECO-FFI2013-31995)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
beat gestures, second language pronunciation, English as a foreign language, accentedness, prosodic prominence, speech rhythm, pronunciation teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review