Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language teacher noticing: A socio-cognitive window on classroom realities

Jackson, Daniel O., Cho, Minyoung·2018·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

This article introduces the construct of teacher noticing, situates it in research on second language teacher cognition, and considers its implications for research on second language teacher training, acknowledging socio-cognitive perspectives on language learning and teaching. We then present a mixed-methods observational study that utilized quantitative and qualitative approaches to study novice teacher noticing in the context of teaching demonstrations carried out as part of eight participants’ undergraduate course requirements. Teacher noticing was defined as awareness of features of second language classroom interaction that may influence student learning. The goals of the study were to: (1) assess our approach to studying teacher noticing, (2) examine the interactional contexts in which teacher noticing occurs, and (3) identify themes in novice teacher noticing. The results indicated that the stimulated recall methodology used was, not surprisingly, sensitive to the time delay between teaching demonstrations and recall interviews. Nonetheless, all participants reported noticing. Teacher noticing occurred primarily when the participants were teaching to the whole class and tended to involve the difference between plans vs. reality, noticing as a trigger for action, and individual learner contributions. The discussion weighs the strengths and limitations of this study and explains how a focus on the significance that teachers place on classroom interactions they become aware of during lessons may benefit research on language teacher education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168816663754

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1111/1540-4781.00159 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bailey K.M., 2012, The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching, 23, 10.1017/9781009024778.004 · doi:10.1017/9781009024778.004
  3. Batstone R., 2010, Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning, 3
  4. Bergsleithner J.M., 2013, Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt
  5. Borg S., 2006, Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice
  6. Borg S., 2013, Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis
  7. 10.1017/S0272263100005337 · DOI
  8. Breen M.P., 1987, Language learning tasks, 23
  9. Burton J., 2009, The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 298, 10.1017/9781139042710.039 · doi:10.1017/9781139042710.039
  10. Creswell J.W., 2011, Designing and conducting mixed methods research
  11. Crookes G., 2003, A practicum in TESOL: Professional development through teaching practice
  12. Farrell T.S.C., 2015, Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals
  13. Gass S.M., 2000, Stimulated recall methodology in second language research
  14. Gebhard J.G., 2009, The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 250, 10.1017/9781139042710.033 · DOI
  15. Knight J., 2014, Focus on teaching: Using video for high-impact instruction
  16. 10.2307/40264511 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Naiman N., 1978, The good language learner
  18. Ortega L., 2011, Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, 167
  19. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch19 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1002/tea.21063 · DOI
  21. Schmidt R., 1995, Attention and awareness in foreign language learning
  22. 10.1515/9781614510932.27 · doi:10.1515/9781614510932.27
  23. Schön D.A., 1983, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
  24. Sherin M.G., 2003, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9, 92, 10.5951/MTMS.9.2.0092 · doi:10.5951/mtms.9.2.0092
  25. 10.4324/9780203832714 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1075/aals.1.10erd · DOI
  27. Tsui A.B.M., 2009, The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 190, 10.1017/9781139042710.025 · doi:10.1017/9781139042710.025
  28. van Es E.A., 2002, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571
  29. 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, D. O., & Cho, M.
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2016-08-09
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
29-46
ISSN
  • 1362-1688
  • 1477-0954
Cited by
24
References
2
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language teacher noticing: A socio-cognitive window on classroom realities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1362168816663754
The paper
Jackson, D. O., & Cho, M. (2018). Language teacher noticing: A socio-cognitive window on classroom realities. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816663754

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.