Cited by 393Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

The CAST (Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test): Preliminary Development of a UK Screen for Mainstream Primary-School-Age Children

Scott, Fiona J., Baron-Cohen, Simon, Bolton, Patrick, Brayne, Carol·2002·Autism

Abstract

The article describes a pilot and follow-up study of the preliminary development of a new tool to screen for Asperger syndrome (AS) and related social and communication conditions (the Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test, CAST) in children aged 4-11 years, in a non-clinical setting. In the pilot study, parents of 13 children with AS and of 37 typically developing children completed the CAST. There were significant differences between the AS and typical sample means. The pilot was used to establish preliminary cut-off scores for the CAST. In the main study, parents of 1150 primary-school-age children were sent the CAST, and 174 took part in the full data analysis. Results suggest that compared with other tools currently available, the CAST may be useful for identifying children at risk for AS and related conditions, in a mainstream non-clinical sample. Further research is ongoing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361302006001003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ASD participants met clinical cut-off scores for Asperger syndrome using ADI-R, Gillberg criteria, or CAST.

    “The individuals also met clinical cut-off scores for AS using either the Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised (Lord et al. 1994), Gillberg and Gillberg’s criteria (Gillberg and Gillberg 1989), or the Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test (Scott et al. 2002).”

    From Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Scott et al. 2002

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 393

Authors
Scott, F. J., Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P., & Brayne, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge, UK
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Autism
Published
2002-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
9-31
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2121350900
Cited by
393
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 24
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Isaac Newton Trust
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, screening tool development, parent questionnaires, autism spectrum disorder, social communication deficits, elementary school students, cut-off values, at-risk identification
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Mainstreaming, Education, Male, Mass Screening, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review