Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Open accessAbstract
Deficits in Theory of Mind (ToM)-the ability to interpret others' beliefs, intentions and emotions-undermine the ability of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to interact in socially normative ways. This study provides psychometric data for the Adult-Theory of Mind (A-ToM) measure using video-scenarios based in part on Happé's (Instructions for theory of mind story task, 1999) Strange Stories test. The final items discriminated IQ-matched adults with ASD from controls on the social but not the physical items. Additional validity data included a two-component principal components solution, correlations with existing ToM scales, and the absence of correlations with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety (not requiring inferences about the intent of others). The expected group differences in ToM were accompanied by marked variability in the ASD sample.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study provides psychometric evaluation of the Adult-Theory of Mind (A-ToM), a video-scenario ToM measure adapted from Happé’s Strange Stories, in 163 adults with ASD and 80 IQ-matched controls. The final 6 social and 6 physical items showed the A-ToM social subtest discriminated ASD from controls after controlling for verbal IQ, while the physical subtest did not.
Key findings
- The final 6-item A-ToM social scale discriminated groups: ASD M = 9.1 (SD = 2.4) vs non-ASD M = 10.4 (SD = 1.5), Cohen’s d = 0.64 [0.37, 0.92]; the physical scale did not: ASD M = 7.7 (SD = 2.7) vs non-ASD M = 8.2 (SD = 2.5), d = 0.22 [−0.05, 0.48].
- After controlling for VCI, A-ToM social score predicted group membership, OR = 1.384, p = .001; A-ToM physical did not, OR = 1.04, p = .471. Strange Stories social OR = 1.463, p < .001, and Strange Stories physical OR = 1.175, p = .018, which the authors say undermines the discriminative capacity of the Strange Stories for adult samples.
- Reliability was acceptable: inter-rater Cohen’s kappa = .77 for A-ToM social and .88 for A-ToM physical; test–retest r = .82 and .64, respectively. PCA yielded two components (social and physical), though two social items also loaded on the physical component.
- The ASD sample showed marked variability: some participants were near ceiling on the A-ToM social scale while others scored very low; A-ToM social and physical correlations with the AQ50 were −0.004 and −0.045, respectively.
Methods
- Participants were 163 adults with ASD or Asperger syndrome (50 female; age 16–62 years, M = 27.0, SD = 11.8) and 80 typically developing controls (56 female; age 17–59 years, M = 26.1, SD = 10.2). Groups were matched on WASI-II Perceptual Reasoning Index but the ASD group had significantly lower Verbal Comprehension Index, so VCI was used as a covariate.
- The A-ToM comprised 17 social and 8 physical video scenarios adapted from Happé’s Strange Stories and Fletcher et al.; participants had 60 s to respond, answers were scored 0–2, and item analysis reduced the final scale to 6 social and 6 physical items. Convergent and discriminant measures included the Strange Stories, Frith-Happé animations, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and mini-SPIN.
- Analyses included item difficulty, discrimination, and item-total correlations; inter-rater and test–retest reliability; principal components analysis; logistic regression predicting group membership after VCI; and correlations for convergent and discriminant validity.
Limitations
- The authors state the sample, though larger than prior work, is not large enough for normative data partitioned by age and gender; the scenarios are short, discrete stimuli, so responses to more prolonged contextual information remain unknown; and the A-ToM is a general measure that may miss specific ToM deficits.
- The authors also state that future work needs independent criterion-related measures of social-cognitive functioning, because the broader functional significance of A-ToM deficits is assumed rather than empirically demonstrated, and that fundamental theoretical issues about other mechanisms remain unresolved.
- Evident from the text: the control sample was mostly undergraduate or transition-to-university students, limiting generalizability; the test–retest interval ranged from 2 to 83 weeks (M = 23.7, SD = 23.4), which may affect stability estimates; and face validity was not formally assessed.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 27 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
A-ToM performance correlates with existing ToM scales.
“Additional validity data included a two-component principal components solution, correlations with existing ToM scales, and the absence of correlations with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety (not requiring inferences about the intent of others).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A-ToM performance does not correlate with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety.
“Additional validity data included a two-component principal components solution, correlations with existing ToM scales, and the absence of correlations with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety (not requiring inferences about the intent of others).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The A-ToM has a two-component principal components solution.
“Additional validity data included a two-component principal components solution, correlations with existing ToM scales, and the absence of correlations with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety (not requiring inferences about the intent of others).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The expected group differences in ToM were accompanied by marked variability in the ASD sample.
“The expected group differences in ToM were accompanied by marked variability in the ASD sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Component 1 corresponded to a social component with all six of the purported social items loading on this component, with loadings ranging from 0.70 to 0.36.
“Component 1 corresponded to a social component with all six of the purported social items loading on this component, with loadings ranging from 0.70 to 0.36.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The corresponding inter-rater reliability values for the Strange Stories' scales were 0.80 and 0.81.
“The corresponding values for the Strange Stories’ scales were 0.80 and 0.81.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The PCA indicated three components explaining 25.4, 11.6 and 8.6% of the variance.
“The PCA indicated three components explaining 25.4, 11.6 and 8.6% of the variance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two separate logistic regressions using vocabulary and similarities instead of VCI at step 1 produced results virtually identical to those for VCI in terms of patterns of statistical significance, variance explained and odds ratios.
“Following a reviewer’s suggestion that the ability to understand more complex language (cf. Happé 1995) – perhaps as indexed by the vocabulary (or similarities) component of the WASI-II – may underpin ToM task performance, we ran two separate logistic regressions using vocabulary and similarities instead of VCI at step 1. In both cases, the results (available from the authors)–in terms of patterns”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Happé 1995 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
VCI contributed significantly to each Frith-Happé variable in the ANOVAs.
“Again, however, VCI contributed significantly for each variable, F (1, 236) = 5.37–22.42, p = .00–-0.02, η 2 = 0.02–0.09.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After controlling for VCI, the A-ToM social score significantly predicted group membership, with each one-unit increase on the A-ToM social scale increasing the odds of being classified as a control group member by a factor of 1.38.
“After controlling for VCI, the A-ToM social score significantly predicted group membership, with each one-unit increase on the A-ToM social scale increasing the odds of being classified as a control group member by a factor of 1.38.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For the control sample, no relationships were detected between the A-ToM and the Frith-Happé animations mental and feelings categorization scales.
“For the control sample, the A-ToM social and physical sub-tests correlated significantly with the corresponding Strange Stories sub-tests, though no relationships were detected for the Frith- Happé animations mental and feelings categorizations scales, likely due to range restriction on both variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The patterns of ceiling and low scores were not evident on the A-ToM physical sub-test.
“Again, these patterns were not evident on the A-ToM physical sub-test.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the ASD sample, expected positive relationships emerged between the A-ToM social sub-test and the other ToM measures.
“In the ASD sample the expected positive relationships emerged between the A-ToM social sub-test and the other ToM measures, as did the relationship between the A-ToM and Strange Stories physical sub-tests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ASD sample reported significantly higher levels of social anxiety than the non-ASD sample on the mini-SPIN.
“They also reported significantly higher levels of social anxiety, t (240) = 5.57, p < .001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Connor et al. 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The corresponding analysis using the A-ToM physical score showed no significant prediction of group membership beyond that provided by VCI.
“The corresponding analysis using the A-ToM physical score showed no significant prediction of group membership beyond that provide by VCI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant relationships between the four measures (the IRI empathy scales and the mini-SPIN) and the A-ToM social scale.
“Yet, as hypothesized, there were no significant relationships between any of these four measures and the A-ToM social scale, −0.01 < r < .13.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The physical sub-test did not differentiate the two groups.
“In contrast, the physical sub-test met expectations in that it did not differentiate the two groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On the perspective taking, empathic concern and personal distress sub-scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, the ASD sample performed worse than the non-ASD sample.
“On the perspective taking, empathic concern and personal distress sub-scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, the ASD sample performed worse6: that is, they were less likely to report taking the psychological perspective of others and expressing concern for others in difficulty, and more likely to report being distressed over problematic interactions with others, t (235–241) = 2.67–6.94, p <”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis 1983 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
For the ASD sample, there were significant and meaningful correlations between all ToM sub-tests and the IQ measures.
“Note also that, for the ASD sample, there were significant and meaningful correlations between all ToM sub-tests and the IQ measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
WASI-II PRI did not contribute to prediction of group membership, as was expected given the matching of groups on PRI, B = -0.020, SE = 0.011, df = 1, p = .087, Exp(B) = 0.981, CI [0.959-1.003].
“Note that WASI-II PRI did not contribute to prediction of group membership, as was expected given the matching of groups on PRI, B=-0.020, SE = 0.011, df = 1, p = .087, Exp (B) = 0.981, CI [0.959–1.003].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The social-VCI correlation was a little stronger for the Strange Stories than for the A-ToM.
“As Tables 6, 7 and 8 shows, the trend was for correlations with VCI to be a little stronger than for PRI, and for the social-VCI correlation to be a little stronger for the Strange Stories than for the A-ToM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The net result of item selection was a social sub-test that differentiated ASD and non-ASD participants.
“Given the item selection criteria, the net result was a social sub-test that differentiated ASD and non-ASD participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant relationships between the four measures and the other ToM measures used to examine convergent validity.
“Nor were there any significant relationships between these scales and the other ToM measures used to examine convergent validity (see below).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In contrast with the A-ToM, the corresponding analysis using the A-ToM physical score did significantly predict group membership after controlling for VCI, with the odds of classification as a control group member rising by a factor of 1.18 with each one-unit physical scale score increase.
“In contrast with the A-ToM, the corresponding analysis using the A-ToM physical score did significantly predict group membership after controlling for VCI, with the odds of classification as a control group member rising by a factor of 1.18 with each one-unit physical scale score increase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the control sample, the A-ToM social and physical sub-tests correlated significantly with the corresponding Strange Stories sub-tests.
“For the control sample, the A-ToM social and physical sub-tests correlated significantly with the corresponding Strange Stories sub-tests, though no relationships were detected for the Frith- Happé animations mental and feelings categorizations scales, likely due to range restriction on both variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the ASD sample, a relationship emerged between the A-ToM and Strange Stories physical sub-tests.
“In the ASD sample the expected positive relationships emerged between the A-ToM social sub-test and the other ToM measures, as did the relationship between the A-ToM and Strange Stories physical sub-tests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One-way ANOVAs with VCI as a covariate on the Frith-Happé mental and feelings scales did not reveal significant main effects for group.
“However, the effects were relatively weak and one way ANOVAs, with VCI as a covariate, on each of these scales did not reveal significant main effects for group, F (1, 236) = 0.01–3.80, p = .053-0.94, partial η 2 = 0.00–0.02.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a lack of relationship between the ToM deficit and the AQ scale.
“Further, while one may expect this deficit to be related to autism severity, the lack of a relationship with the AQ scale suggests this may not be the case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were significant correlations between the A-ToM scales and the corresponding scales from the Strange Stories and the Frith-Happé animations.
“First, there were significant correlations between the A-ToM scales and the corresponding scales from the Strange Stories and the Frith-Happé animations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The differentiation on both Strange Stories scales persisted after controlling for VCI.
“On the Strange Stories, the groups were clearly differentiated on the social scale–but they were also differentiated on the physical scale and the differentiation on both scales persisted after controlling for VCI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Principal components analysis confirmed the presence of relatively neat social and physical components.
“Principal components analysis confirmed the presence of relatively neat social and physical components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There were clear differences in VCI between the two groups.
“Importantly, the differentiation on the social scale was maintained after controlling for verbal IQ, despite clear differences in VCI between the two groups and a significant relationship between VCI and the A-ToM social scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Strange Stories and Frith-Happé animations did not show the same differentiation between ASD and non-ASD adults that was exhibited on the A-ToM.
“Additionally, with the benefit of a much larger sample size than has previously been used in this area of research, the other measures of ToM–the Strange Stories and the Frith-Happé animations–did not show the same differentiation between ASD and non-ASD adults that was exhibited on the A-ToM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The differentiation on the social scale was maintained after controlling for verbal IQ.
“Importantly, the differentiation on the social scale was maintained after controlling for verbal IQ, despite clear differences in VCI between the two groups and a significant relationship between VCI and the A-ToM social scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant relationship between VCI and the A-ToM social scale.
“Importantly, the differentiation on the social scale was maintained after controlling for verbal IQ, despite clear differences in VCI between the two groups and a significant relationship between VCI and the A-ToM social scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were acceptable, especially given the interval between tests.
“Inter-rater and test–retest reliability were acceptable, especially given the interval between tests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The ASD group had significantly lower Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) than the non-ASD group.
“but the ASD group was significantly lower on the VCI, t (241) = 4.15, p < .001, d = 0.57, 95% CI [0.29, 0.84].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The ASD and non-ASD groups were matched on performance IQ (PRI).
“The two groups proved to be nicely matched on the PRI, t (241) = 1.28, p = 20, d = 0.18, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.44]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The A-ToM video format with a 1-min response limit should provide a more complete understanding of a person's impairment in ToM than pencil-and-paper scenarios.
“A tool that does not provide an opportunity for a person to routinely follow rules or hack out solutions, but requires the monitoring of the unfolding of relationships between characters and the understanding of other subtle social nuances, should provide a more complete understanding of a person’s impairment in this domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
ASD participants met clinical cut-off scores for Asperger syndrome using ADI-R, Gillberg criteria, or CAST.
“The individuals also met clinical cut-off scores for AS using either the Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised (Lord et al. 1994), Gillberg and Gillberg’s criteria (Gillberg and Gillberg 1989), or the Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test (Scott et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The Awkward Moments Test and MASC showed promise in discriminating adults with ASD from control participants.
“Although both instruments showed promise in discriminating adults with ASD from control participants, the sample sizes were so small (<20 per group) that it was obviously not possible to conduct a detailed psychometric evaluation of the instruments or to assess the reliability of the its correlations with other relevant measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Ponnet et al. (2008) found that ASD-linked deficits in interpreting emotional expressions in actors' conversations were more pronounced when the context was naturalistic and unstructured rather than highly organized or predictable.
“Ponnet et al. (2008) found that ASD-linked deficits in interpreting emotional expressions in actors’ conversations were more pronounced when the context was naturalistic and unstructured rather than highly organized or predictable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ponnet et al. (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Differences in social attention between ASD and typically developing samples only emerged with naturalistic (rather than static) stimuli capturing the dynamics of social interactions.
“This finding aligns with observations that differences in social attention between ASD and typically developing samples only emerged with naturalistic (rather than static) stimuli capturing the dynamics of social interactions (Chevallier et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chevallier et al. 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The sample sizes in studies of the Awkward Moments Test and MASC were so small (<20 per group) that detailed psychometric evaluation or reliability assessment was not possible.
“Although both instruments showed promise in discriminating adults with ASD from control participants, the sample sizes were so small (<20 per group) that it was obviously not possible to conduct a detailed psychometric evaluation of the instruments or to assess the reliability of the its correlations with other relevant measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of relationships for the control sample between the A-ToM and the Frith-Happé scales is likely due to range restriction on both variables.
“For the control sample, the A-ToM social and physical sub-tests correlated significantly with the corresponding Strange Stories sub-tests, though no relationships were detected for the Frith- Happé animations mental and feelings categorizations scales, likely due to range restriction on both variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
It is unlikely that the A-ToM was simply reflecting self-reported autism severity.
“suggesting that it is unlikely the A-ToM was simply reflecting (self-reported) autism severity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Table 5 data provide the first large-sample indication of the degree of overlap on a ToM measure between ASD and non-ASD adult samples.
“Table 5 shows the distributions of scores on the two A-ToM sub-tests for each group, with these data providing the first large-sample indication of the degree of overlap on a ToM measure between ASD and non-ASD adult samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Although two items loaded on both components, the PCA provides a basis for concluding that the two sub-tests were tapping two different aspects of functioning.
“While the loading of two items on both components indicates that the social and cognitive items did not separate neatly into two completely independent components, the PCA provides a basis for concluding that the two sub-tests were tapping these two different aspects of functioning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lack of relationship with the AQ scale suggests that a ToM deficit may not be related to autism severity.
“Further, while one may expect this deficit to be related to autism severity, the lack of a relationship with the AQ scale suggests this may not be the case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The A-ToM instrument has considerable potential for use with ASD adults as a pointer to the types of deficits that may constrain the adaptiveness of their social interactions in a variety of situations.
“Our data suggest that the instrument has considerable potential for use with ASD adults as a pointer to the types of deficits that may constrain the adaptiveness of their social interactions in a variety of situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 38
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe final A-ToM items discriminated IQ-matched adults with ASD from controls on the social items but not the physical items.
“The final items discriminated IQ-matched adults with ASD from controls on the social but not the physical items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCorrected item-total correlations for Components 1 and 2 ranged from 0.32 to 0.55 and 0.24 to 0.40, respectively.
“Corrected item-total correlations for Components 1 and 2 ranged from 0.32 to 0.55 and 0.24 to 0.40, respectively5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTest-retest coefficients (r) were 0.82 and 0.64 for the A-ToM social and physical scales, respectively.
“Test retest coefficients (r) were 0.82 and 0.64 for the A-ToM social and physical scales, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataComponent 2 corresponded to a physical component, with all six purported physical items loading on this component (loadings 0.59 to 0.41), as did two items (party and bunnies) with loadings of 0.40 and 0.53, which also loaded on the social component (loadings 0.69 and 0.36).
“Component 2 corresponded to a physical component. All six of the purported physical items loaded on this component, with loadings ranging from 0.59 to 0.41, as did two items (party and bunnies) with loadings of 0.40 and 0.53, which also loaded on the social component, with loadings of 0.69 and 0.36.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe final A-ToM scale comprises six social and six physical items.
“The six social and six physical items3 that comprised the final scale (after the psychometric analyses) can be accessed via the link below:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInter-rater reliability, using Cohen's kappa, was 0.77 for the 6-item A-ToM social scale and 0.88 for the 6-item A-ToM physical scale.
“Inter-rater reliability, using Cohen’s kappa, was 0.77 for the 6-item A-ToM social scale and 0.88 for the 6-item A-ToM physical scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA parallel analysis indicated two components and the PCA was repeated to extract a two component solution.
“The outcomes of this analysis indicated two components and the PCA was repeated to extract a two component solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe correlations between the A-ToM social and physical sub-tests and the AQ50 were −0.004 and −0.045, respectively, for the ASD sample.
“Interestingly, the respective correlations between the A-ToM social and physical sub-tests and the AQ50, which we used as a filler task, were −0.004 and −0.045, respectively, for the ASD sample”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CI and effect size statistics in Table 3 suggest that the ASD sample performed worse than controls on the A-ToM social sub-test, with the group difference effect size much lower for the A-ToM physical sub-test.
“The CI and effect size statistics shown in Table 3 suggest that the ASD sample performed worse than the controls on the A-ToM social sub-test, with the group difference effect size much lower for the A-ToM physical sub-test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter item-pool reduction, the social items did not emerge as significantly more difficult overall than the physical items for either the ASD sample (M = 0.61, SD = 0.21 vs. M = 0.55, SD = 0.16; t(10) = 0.57, p = .58) or the non-ASD controls (M = 0.76, SD = 0.21 vs. M = 0.61, SD = 0.14; t(10) = 1.45, p = .18).
“Importantly, the outcome of the reduction of the item pool was such that the social items did not emerge as significantly more difficult overall than the physical items (contrary to what Fletcher et al. 1995, had found for the original Strange Stories physical items) for either the ASD sample (M = 0.61, SD = 0.21 vs. M = 0.55, SD = 0.16), t (10) = 0.57, p = .58, or the non-ASD controls (M = 0.76,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fletcher et al. 1995 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough some participants in both groups were close to or at ceiling on the social sub-test, this pattern was less marked for ASD participants, and extremely low social scores were more prevalent for ASD participants.
“Although some participants in both groups were close to or at ceiling on the social sub-test, this pattern was less marked for the ASD participants. Moreover, extremely low social scores were more prevalent for ASD participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe final six social items included examples of faux pas (1), sarcasm (2), white lie (1), bluff or persuasion (1) and perspective taking or misunderstanding (1).
“The final six items included examples of faux pas (1), sarcasm (2), white lie (1), bluff or persuasion (1) and perspective taking or misunderstanding (1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVCI did not predict group membership, but after controlling for VCI, the Strange Stories social score did, with each one-unit increase on the social scale increasing the odds of being classified as a control group member by a factor of 1.46.
“The VCI did not predict group membership but, after controlling for VCI, the Strange Stories social score did, with each increase of one-unit on the social scale increasing the odds of being classified as a control group member by a factor of 1.46.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe trend was for correlations with VCI to be a little stronger than for PRI.
“As Tables 6, 7 and 8 shows, the trend was for correlations with VCI to be a little stronger than for PRI, and for the social-VCI correlation to be a little stronger for the Strange Stories than for the A-ToM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the Frith-Happé animations, effect size indices suggest small group differences in the expected directions on the mental and feelings categorization scales, but not on the random or goal-directed scales.
“For the Frith- Happé animations, the other instrument included to examine convergent validity, the effect size indices shown in Table 3 suggest small group differences, in the expected directions, on the mental and feelings categorization (but not the random or goal-directed) scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the Strange Stories, the CI and effect size patterns for the social sub-test were similar to those for the A-ToM, with the two groups clearly differentiated on the social sub-test.
“For the Strange Stories, the CI and effect size patterns for the social sub-test were similar in nature to those for the A-ToM, with the two groups clearly differentiated on the social sub-test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome individuals with ASD had little difficulty interpreting social interactions accurately, while others were quite markedly impaired.
“Some individuals clearly had little difficulty interpreting the social interactions accurately; others were quite markedly impaired.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough the ASD group performed worse on the mental and feelings measures of the Frith-Happé animations, the effect sizes were relatively weak and the differences were not significant with VCI controlled.
“Although the ASD group performed worse on the mental and feelings measures of the Frith-Happé animations, the effect sizes were relatively weak and the differences were not significant with VCI controlled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite clear group differentiation on the A-ToM social scale, variability in ToM performance within the ASD sample was substantial.
“Despite the clear group differentiation on the A-ToM social scale, the variability in ToM performance within the ASD sample was substantial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe expected group differences emerged on the empathy and social anxiety scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the mini-SPIN, yet these measures were uncorrelated with the A-ToM social scale.
“Second, the expected group differences emerged on the empathy and social anxiety scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the mini-SPIN, yet these measures were uncorrelated with the A-ToM social scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the Strange Stories, the groups were clearly differentiated on the social scale, but they were also differentiated on the physical scale.
“On the Strange Stories, the groups were clearly differentiated on the social scale–but they were also differentiated on the physical scale and the differentiation on both scales persisted after controlling for VCI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataVCI was used as a covariate in analyses.
“Accordingly, the VCI was used as a covariate in analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFrith (2004) suggested that much of the apparent variability in ToM test performance in adult samples may reflect the extent to which the task allows an individual to hack out a solution to a problem.
“In a similar vein, Frith (2004) suggested that much of the apparent variability in ToM test performance that may be seen in adult samples may reflect the extent to which the task allows an individual to hack out a solution to a problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frith (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPersons with ASD have unique cognitive profiles and matching with typical controls is difficult.
“We acknowledge that persons with ASD have unique cognitive profiles and matching with typical controls is difficult; thus, the use of scales such as the Wechsler Scales is preferred as it taps the diversity in abilities (cf. Mottron 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mottron 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe 25 scenarios were incorporated into a VLC Media Player playlist in a random order, with four different randomly-ordered versions created for counterbalancing purposes and social and physical videos distributed randomly throughout each version.
“The 25 scenarios were incorporated into a VLC Media Player playlist in a random order. Four different randomly-ordered versions were created for counterbalancing purposes, with social and physical videos distributed randomly throughout each version.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure (KMO = 0.82) exceeding 0.6 and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity, χ2(66) = 364.7, p < .001, confirmed the adequacy of the sample size and the correlations between items.
“A Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure (KMO = 0.82) exceeding 0.6 (Tabachnick and Fidell 2001) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity, χ 2 (66) = 364.7, p < .001, respectively, confirmed the adequacy of the sample size and the correlations between items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tabachnick and Fidell 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPerformance IQ was the preferred match because it is less affected by verbal demands and thought to be a purer reflection of IQ.
“Performance IQ was our preferred match as it is less affected by the verbal demands of the test and thus thought to be a purer reflection of IQ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhite et al. (2011) found that adults with ASD were less effective than age and IQ-matched controls at identifying mental state interactions and categorizing emotions.
“White et al. (2011) found that adults with ASD were less effective than age and IQ-matched controls at identifying mental state interactions and categorizing emotions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites White et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSelection of the 60 s interval was based on a pilot study in which 25 upper-level psychology students were group-tested, recording the time it took for most of the group to complete their response to each question.
“Selection of this interval was based on a pilot study in which we group-tested 25 upper-level psychology students, recording the time it took for most of the group to complete their response to each question.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe WASI-II Block Design and Matrix Reasoning subtests make up the Perceptual Reasoning component, while the Vocabulary and Similarities subtests make up the Verbal Comprehension component.
“The Block Design and Matrix Reasoning subtests make up the Perceptual Reasoning component, while the Vocabulary and Similarities subtests make up the Verbal Comprehension component.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Mini-SPIN is a three item, self-report screener for generalized social anxiety disorder.
“The Mini-SPIN–based on an item analysis of the Social Phobia Inventory (see Connor et al. 2001, for psychometric data)–is a three item, self-report screener for generalized social anxiety disorder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Connor et al. 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe two convergent validity measures used were the Strange Stories test and the Frith-Happé animations.
“The two measures used were the Strange Stories test and the Frith-Happé animations (White et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites White et al. 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenParticipants' answers were rated on a 0-2 scale (0 = incorrect, 1 = partially correct, 2 = correct), with scoring criteria providing examples for each answer type for each item.
“Participants’ answers were rated on a 0–2 scale: 0 (incorrect), 1 (partially correct) or 2 (correct), with the scoring criteria providing examples for each answer type provided for each item”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe remaining 12 ASD participants were diagnosed by a psychologist recognized by the local agency or by two qualified diagnosticians.
“The other 12 participants were diagnosed either by a psychologist recognized by the local agency or by two qualified diagnosticians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe use of scales such as the Wechsler Scales is preferred for matching because it taps the diversity in abilities.
“We acknowledge that persons with ASD have unique cognitive profiles and matching with typical controls is difficult; thus, the use of scales such as the Wechsler Scales is preferred as it taps the diversity in abilities (cf. Mottron 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mottron 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenParticipants were instructed at the beginning of the task that they would have 60 s in which to record their response for each question.
“Participants were instructed at the beginning of the task that they would have 60 s in which to record their response for each question.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReliability and validity data for the WASI-II are reported in McCrimmon & Smith (2012).
“Reliability and validity data are reported in McCrimmon & Smith (2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McCrimmon & Smith (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAll but 12 ASD participants were diagnosed by two qualified diagnosticians and met DSM-IV-TR criteria.
“All but 12 participants were registered with the local agency that coordinates statewide assessment and provision of services. All individuals registered with the local agency had been diagnosed by two qualified diagnosticians and met DSM-IV-TR [APA 2000] criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites APA 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Interpersonal Reactivity Index comprises four seven-item, self-report sub-scales which tap four different aspects of empathy.
“The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (see Davis 1983, for reliability and construct validity data) comprises four seven-item, self-report sub-scales which tap four different aspects of empathy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis 1983 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTo assess inter-rater reliability, two observers blind to participant group studied and practiced with the scoring protocols and, after training, scored 30% (N = 73) of the response sheets.
“To assess inter-rater reliability for the A-ToM and the Strange Stories, two observers (blind to participant’s group) studied, and practiced with, the scoring protocols and, after training, scored 30% (N = 73) of the response sheets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough verbal IQ contributed to group differences, the A-ToM social, but not the physical, sub-test discriminated the ASD from the non-ASD sample, thereby meeting one of the expectations for the instrument.
“In sum, although verbal IQ clearly contributed to group differences (see Table 5), the A-ToM social, but not the physical, sub-test discriminated the ASD from the non-ASD sample, thereby meeting one of the expectations for the instrument.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataTo examine stability of the A-ToM, 40 individuals were retested by one of the two administrators at intervals ranging from 2 to 83 weeks (M = 23.7 weeks, SD = 23.4 weeks).
“To examine stability of the A-ToM, 40 individuals were retested by one of the two administrators at intervals ranging from 2 to 83 weeks (M = 23.7 weeks, SD = 23.4 weeks).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAll physical items were based on, or adapted from, items described in Happé (1999).
“All physical items were based on, or adapted from, items described in Happé (1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Happé (1999)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFor the Strange Stories, even after removing VCI, group membership was differentiated by both the social and physical sub-tests rather than by the social sub-test alone, which undermines the discriminative capacity of the Strange Stories for adult samples.
“Thus, for the Strange Stories, even after removing VCI, group membership was differentiated by both the social and physical sub-tests rather than by the social sub-test alone, a finding which undermines the discriminative capacity of the Strange Stories for adult samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThree of the six final social items were based on, or adapted from, items described in Happé (1999), and the other three were from the pool developed for this study.
“Three of these six items were based on, or adapted from, items described in Happé (1999), and the other three items were from the pool developed for this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Happé (1999)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere were clear group differences but also marked variability within groups on the A-ToM social sub-test.
“In other words, there were clear group differences but there was also marked variability within groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe presentation order of the A-ToM and Strange Stories was counterbalanced.
“The presentation order of the A-ToM and Strange Stories was counterbalanced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThere were two test administrators, both of whom had completed honors level studies in psychology.
“There were two test administrators, both of whom had completed honors level studies in psychology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf lack of a ToM deficit does not preclude diagnosis, it would call into question whether a ToM deficit should be considered a core feature of the disorder, at least in adulthood.
“If indeed this proved to be the case it would call into question whether a ToM deficit should be considered a core feature of the disorder (at least in adulthood).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile a ToM deficit may be indicative of ASD in adults, the lack of one (at least as detected on an instrument such as the A-ToM) may not preclude a diagnosis.
“Thus, while a ToM deficit may be indicative of ASD in adults, the lack of one (at least as detected on an instrument such as the A-ToM) may not preclude a diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExaminees are likely to perceive the A-ToM scenarios as realistic (face validity), although this was not formally assessed.
“Moreover, the characteristics of the stimuli are such that examinees are likely to perceive the scenarios as realistic (i.e., as having face validity, although we did not formally assess this), thereby providing a plausible starting point for client-clinician discussions about the nuances of social interaction and the interpretation of the interpersonal behaviors of others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Deficits in Theory of Mind undermine the ability of individuals with ASD to interact in socially normative ways.
“Deficits in Theory of Mind (ToM)—the ability to interpret others’ beliefs, intentions and emotions—undermine the ability of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to interact in socially normative ways.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no universally accepted operationalization of ToM.
“Numerous instruments have been developed to measure ToM, or some aspect(s) of ToM, in individuals with ASD, although there has been no universally accepted operationalization of ToM.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Administration of existing ToM instruments has not been standardized and a number of variants have been used.
“A key limitation is that the administration of the instruments has not been standardized and a number of variants of the tests have been used.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the absence of a standardized tool used with large sample sizes, a close psychometric evaluation is not possible.
“In the absence of a standardized tool used with large sample sizes, a close psychometric evaluation that would normally be associated with the development of an assessment tool is not possible.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many ToM instruments used in ASD research were developed to explore hypotheses about the nature of deficits rather than to provide a formal assessment device, so psychometric analysis was not on the test developers' agendas.
“First, many of the ToM instruments used in research with participants with ASD were developed to explore hypotheses about the nature of deficits in ASD rather than to provide a formal assessment device akin to an intelligence or personality test. Consequently, a probing psychometric analysis was not on the test developers’ agendas.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Researchers generally find it extremely difficult to access the number of individuals with ASD that would make a psychometric exercise viable, so reliable normative data are non-existent.
“Second, researchers generally find it extremely difficult to access the number of individuals with ASD that would make such a psychometric exercise viable. Consequently, reliable normative data are non-existent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a paucity of empirical data on the extent and variability of ToM deficits in adults with ASD.
“Put simply, there is a paucity of empirical data on the extent and variability of ToM deficits in adults with ASD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Interpersonal Reactivity Index and Mini-SPIN do not involve the type of social-cognitive reasoning associated with reading the subtleties of an unfolding social interaction.
“they do not appear to involve the type of social-cognitive reasoning associated with reading the subtleties of an unfolding social interaction.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One symptom reported by individuals with ASD are difficulties in intuitively empathizing with others' emotional states, especially in situations that require an integration of complex social information.
“One symptom reported by individuals with ASD are difficulties in intuitively empathizing with others’ emotional states, especially in situations that require an integration of complex social information3,4.”
From Randomized clinical trial shows no substantial modulation of empathy-related neural activation by intranasal oxytocin in autism (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(241) = 4.15reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (241) = 4.15, p < .001”
- Consistentt(10) = 0.57reported p = .58 · recomputed p = .581
“t (10) = 0.57, p = .58”
- Consistentt(10) = 1.45reported p = .18 · recomputed p = .178
“t (10) = 1.45, p = .18”
- Consistentχ²(66) = 364.7reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“χ 2 (66) = 364.7, p < .001”
- Consistentt(240) = 5.57reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (240) = 5.57, p < .001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Logistic-regression results are attributed to the wrong table
MinorThe text directs readers to Table 5 for regression coefficients and odds ratios, but Table 5 contains score frequencies. Those regression results appear in Table 4.
“Table 5 summarizes the outcomes of these analyses (B, standard error of B, degrees of freedom, p value, Odds ratio or Exp (B) and Nagelkerke R2.”
“Table: Table 5 Number of participants (and cumulative proportion) obtaining each score on the A-ToM social and physical scales for the ASD and non-ASD control sample”
ASD physical-score frequencies total 158, not 163
MinorThe frequencies across the 13 physical-score categories sum to 158, five fewer than the stated ASD sample of 163. The final cumulative proportion is therefore not 1 as printed.
Reported 163 · recomputed 158
“Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | Physical | | ASD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Frequency | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 28 | 22 | 15 | 12 | 10 |”
A-ToM physical score is described as both significant and nonsignificant
MinorOne results paragraph says the A-ToM physical score did not significantly predict group membership; a later paragraph says it did. The later paragraph discusses Strange Stories and appears to name the wrong physical score.
“The corresponding analysis using the A-ToM physical score showed no significant prediction of group membership beyond that provide by VCI.”
“the corresponding analysis using the A-ToM physical score did significantly predict group membership after controlling for VCI”
Strange Stories physical mean does not match its confidence interval
MinorThe reported non-ASD physical mean is 14.1, but its confidence interval, [13.2, 14.1], is centered at 13.65. The other reported confidence intervals are approximately centered on their means.
Reported 14.1 · recomputed 13.65
“| Strange Stories: Physical | Strange Stories: Physical | Strange Stories: Physical | | Mean (& SD) | 12.1 (3.0) | 14.1 (2.1) | | 95% CIs | [11.7, 12.6] | [13.2, 14.1] |”
Identical Strange Stories summary statistics have different effect sizes
MinorThe social and physical Strange Stories rows give identical group means and SDs, yet report different Cohen's d values, 0.76 and 0.54. Those identical inputs cannot produce both effect sizes.
“| Strange Stories: Physical | Strange Stories: Physical | Strange Stories: Physical | | Mean (& SD) | 12.1 (3.0) | 14.1 (2.1) | | 95% CIs | [11.7, 12.6] | [13.2, 14.1] | | Cohen’s d (& 95% CIs) | 0.54 [0.27, 0.81] | 0.54 [0.27, 0.81] |”
“| Strange Stories: Social | Strange Stories: Social | Strange Stories: Social | | Social | Social | Social | | Mean (& SD) | 12.1 (3.0) | 14.1 (2.1) | | 95% CIs | [11.6, 12.5] | [13.7, 14.6] | | Cohen’s d (& 95% CIs) | 0.76 [0.48, 1.04] | 0.76 [0.48, 1.04] |”
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369 · see citing works
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,841 · see citing works
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,888 · see citing works
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u · Cited by 14,523 · see citing works
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272 · see citing works
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272 · Cited by 9,587 · see citing works
Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02172145 · Cited by 9,065 · see citing works
Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 · Cited by 8,599 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Early research in this area, shaped by research examining ToM in young typically developing children, used variants of the false belief tasks used widely in mainstream developmental research (e.g., Baillargeon et al. 2010; Baron-Cohen et al. 1985; Bowler 1992; Wimmer and Perner 1983).”
Method(1995) · Cited by 6,909 · see citing works
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1005653411471 · Cited by 6,450 · see citing works
Wimmer, H. (1983) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 · Cited by 6,305 · see citing works
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715 · Cited by 4,555 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, flirtatious, hostile) with the expression conveyed by an image of a pair of eyes (Baron-Cohen et al. 2001).”
BackgroundBaron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 4,313 · see citing works
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2412 · Cited by 3,670 · see citing works
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001 · Cited by 3,428 · see citing works
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 · Cited by 3,139 · see citing works
Happé, F. G. E. (1994) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02172093 · Cited by 2,352 · see citing works
Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension.
Fletcher, P. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-r · Cited by 1,522 · see citing works
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence--Second Edition
Wechsler, D. (2018) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15171-000 · Cited by 1,153 · see citing works
False-belief understanding in infants
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & He, Z. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
Allison, C., Auyeung, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2011.11.003 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
Introducing MASC: A Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition
Dziobek, I., Fleck, S., Kalbe, E., Rogers, K., Hassenstab, J., Brand, M., Kessler, J., Woike, J. K., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0107-0 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism.
Van de Cruys, S., Evers, K., Van der Hallen, R., Van Eylen, L., Boets, B., de-Wit, L., & Wagemans, J. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037665 · Cited by 885 · see citing works
Mindblind eyes: an absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome
Senju, A., Southgate, V., White, S., & Frith, U. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176170 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
Theory of mind and autism: A review
Baron‐Cohen, S. (2000) · International review of research in mental retardation · doi:10.1016/s0074-7750(00)80010-5 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Abell, F., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2000) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/s0885-2014(00)00014-9 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Asperger Syndrome—Some Epidemiological Considerations: A Research Note
Gillberg, I. C., & Gillberg, C. (1989) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00275.x · Cited by 603 · see citing works
‘Theory of mind’ in the brain. Evidence from a PET scan study of Asperger syndrome
Happe, F. G. E., Ehlers, S., Fletcher, P. C., Uta Frith, A., Johansson, M., Gillberg, C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. (1996) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199612200-00040 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder
Connor, K. M., Kobak, K. A., Churchill, L. E., Katzelnick, D., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2001) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.1055 · Cited by 537 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As well as requiring the two groups to be distinguished on the A-ToM social, but not the physical, sub-test, we predicted that the three self-report scales of empathy from the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis 1983) and the miniSPIN screener for generalized social anxiety disorder (Connor et al. 2001) would show g…”
Background“Theory of Mind” in Asperger's Syndrome Dermot M. Bowler
Bowler, D. M. (1992) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb01962.x · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Face identity recognition in autism spectrum disorders: A review of behavioral studies
Weigelt, S., Koldewyn, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.008 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Emanuel Miller lecture: Confusions and controversies about Asperger syndrome
Frith, U. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00262.x · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Revisiting the Strange Stories: Revealing Mentalizing Impairments in Autism
White, S. J., Hill, E. L., Happe, F. G. E., & Uta Frith, A. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01319.x · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Scott, F. J., Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P., & Brayne, C. (2002) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361302006001003 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Understanding Minds and Metaphors: Insights from the Study of Figurative Language in Autism
Happé, F. G. E. (1995) · Metaphor and Symbolic Activity · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1004_3 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Review of the <i>Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II)</i>
McCrimmon, A. W., & Smith, A. D. (2013) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282912467756 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Jolliffe, T., & Baron‐Cohen, S. (1999) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1023082928366 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Chevallier, C., Parish‐Morris, J., McVey, A., Rump, K. M., Sasson, N. J., Herrington, J. D., & Schultz, R. T. (2015) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1479 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
The Awkward Moments Test: A Naturalistic Measure of Social Understanding in Autism
Heavey, L., Phillips, W., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M. (2000) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1005544518785 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Roeyers, H., Buysse, A., Ponnet, K., & Pichal, B. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00718 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Mottron, L. (2004) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000018070.88380.83 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Global/Local Processing in Autism: Not a Disability, but a Disinclination
Koldewyn, K., Jiang, Y. V., Weigelt, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2013) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1777-z · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Nuske, H. J., Vivanti, G., & Dissanayake, C. (2013) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.762900 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Visual attention abnormalities in autism: delayed orienting to location
Townsend, J., Harris, N. S., & Courchesne, E. (1996) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617700001715 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
White, S. J., Coniston, D., Rogers, R., & Frith, U. (2011) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.174 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
What's domain-specific about theory of mind?
Stone, V. E., & Gerrans, P. (2006) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910601029221 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
A temporally sustained implicit theory of mind deficit in autism spectrum disorders
Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., Bayliss, A. P., & Dux, P. E. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.004 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Advanced Mind-Reading in Adults with Asperger Syndrome
Ponnet, K. S., Roeyers, H., Buysse, A., Clercq, A. D., & Heyden, E. V. D. (2004) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361304045214 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Globerson, E., Amir, N., Kishon‐Rabin, L., & Golan, O. (2014) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1432 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Mind-Reading in Young Adults with ASD: Does Structure Matter?
Ponnet, K., Buysse, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2008) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0462-5 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Kuchinke, L., Schneider, D., Kotz, S. A., & Jacobs, A. M. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.026 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Brewer, N., & Young, R. L. (2015). Crime and autism spectrum disorder: Myths and mechanisms. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Livingston, L. A., & Happé, F. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.005 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Mayer, A. V., Wermter, A.-K., Stroth, S., Alter, P., Haberhausen, M., Stehr, T., Paulus, F. M., Krach, S., & Kamp-Becker, I. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94407-x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brewer, N., Young, R. L., & Barnett, E.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Brewer, Neil
- Venue
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
- Published
- 2017-03-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1927-1941
- ISSN
- 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3432
- PMC
- PMC5487761
- OpenAlex
- W2591658426
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-05-09)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Flinders Research Grants
- Hamish Ramsay Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- theory of mind, autism spectrum disorder, psychometric validation, video scenarios, social cognition, empathy, social anxiety, autistic adults
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Empathy, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Psychometrics, Theory of Mind, Social Skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review