Cited by 122Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Brewer, Neil, Young, Robyn L., Barnett, Emily·2017·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Deficits in Theory of Mind (ToM)-the ability to interpret others' beliefs, intentions and emotions-undermine the ability of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to interact in socially normative ways. This study provides psychometric data for the Adult-Theory of Mind (A-ToM) measure using video-scenarios based in part on Happé's (Instructions for theory of mind story task, 1999) Strange Stories test. The final items discriminated IQ-matched adults with ASD from controls on the social but not the physical items. Additional validity data included a two-component principal components solution, correlations with existing ToM scales, and the absence of correlations with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety (not requiring inferences about the intent of others). The expected group differences in ToM were accompanied by marked variability in the ASD sample.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study provides psychometric evaluation of the Adult-Theory of Mind (A-ToM), a video-scenario ToM measure adapted from Happé’s Strange Stories, in 163 adults with ASD and 80 IQ-matched controls. The final 6 social and 6 physical items showed the A-ToM social subtest discriminated ASD from controls after controlling for verbal IQ, while the physical subtest did not.

Key findings

  • The final 6-item A-ToM social scale discriminated groups: ASD M = 9.1 (SD = 2.4) vs non-ASD M = 10.4 (SD = 1.5), Cohen’s d = 0.64 [0.37, 0.92]; the physical scale did not: ASD M = 7.7 (SD = 2.7) vs non-ASD M = 8.2 (SD = 2.5), d = 0.22 [−0.05, 0.48].
  • After controlling for VCI, A-ToM social score predicted group membership, OR = 1.384, p = .001; A-ToM physical did not, OR = 1.04, p = .471. Strange Stories social OR = 1.463, p < .001, and Strange Stories physical OR = 1.175, p = .018, which the authors say undermines the discriminative capacity of the Strange Stories for adult samples.
  • Reliability was acceptable: inter-rater Cohen’s kappa = .77 for A-ToM social and .88 for A-ToM physical; test–retest r = .82 and .64, respectively. PCA yielded two components (social and physical), though two social items also loaded on the physical component.
  • The ASD sample showed marked variability: some participants were near ceiling on the A-ToM social scale while others scored very low; A-ToM social and physical correlations with the AQ50 were −0.004 and −0.045, respectively.

Methods

  • Participants were 163 adults with ASD or Asperger syndrome (50 female; age 16–62 years, M = 27.0, SD = 11.8) and 80 typically developing controls (56 female; age 17–59 years, M = 26.1, SD = 10.2). Groups were matched on WASI-II Perceptual Reasoning Index but the ASD group had significantly lower Verbal Comprehension Index, so VCI was used as a covariate.
  • The A-ToM comprised 17 social and 8 physical video scenarios adapted from Happé’s Strange Stories and Fletcher et al.; participants had 60 s to respond, answers were scored 0–2, and item analysis reduced the final scale to 6 social and 6 physical items. Convergent and discriminant measures included the Strange Stories, Frith-Happé animations, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and mini-SPIN.
  • Analyses included item difficulty, discrimination, and item-total correlations; inter-rater and test–retest reliability; principal components analysis; logistic regression predicting group membership after VCI; and correlations for convergent and discriminant validity.

Limitations

  • The authors state the sample, though larger than prior work, is not large enough for normative data partitioned by age and gender; the scenarios are short, discrete stimuli, so responses to more prolonged contextual information remain unknown; and the A-ToM is a general measure that may miss specific ToM deficits.
  • The authors also state that future work needs independent criterion-related measures of social-cognitive functioning, because the broader functional significance of A-ToM deficits is assumed rather than empirically demonstrated, and that fundamental theoretical issues about other mechanisms remain unresolved.
  • Evident from the text: the control sample was mostly undergraduate or transition-to-university students, limiting generalizability; the test–retest interval ranged from 2 to 83 weeks (M = 23.7, SD = 23.4), which may affect stability estimates; and face validity was not formally assessed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-017-3080-x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 27 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    A-ToM performance correlates with existing ToM scales.

    “Additional validity data included a two-component principal components solution, correlations with existing ToM scales, and the absence of correlations with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety (not requiring inferences about the intent of others).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A-ToM performance does not correlate with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety.

    “Additional validity data included a two-component principal components solution, correlations with existing ToM scales, and the absence of correlations with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety (not requiring inferences about the intent of others).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The A-ToM has a two-component principal components solution.

    “Additional validity data included a two-component principal components solution, correlations with existing ToM scales, and the absence of correlations with self-report measures of empathy and social anxiety (not requiring inferences about the intent of others).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The expected group differences in ToM were accompanied by marked variability in the ASD sample.

    “The expected group differences in ToM were accompanied by marked variability in the ASD sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Component 1 corresponded to a social component with all six of the purported social items loading on this component, with loadings ranging from 0.70 to 0.36.

    “Component 1 corresponded to a social component with all six of the purported social items loading on this component, with loadings ranging from 0.70 to 0.36.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The final A-ToM items discriminated IQ-matched adults with ASD from controls on the social items but not the physical items.

    “The final items discriminated IQ-matched adults with ASD from controls on the social but not the physical items.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Corrected item-total correlations for Components 1 and 2 ranged from 0.32 to 0.55 and 0.24 to 0.40, respectively.

    “Corrected item-total correlations for Components 1 and 2 ranged from 0.32 to 0.55 and 0.24 to 0.40, respectively5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Test-retest coefficients (r) were 0.82 and 0.64 for the A-ToM social and physical scales, respectively.

    “Test retest coefficients (r) were 0.82 and 0.64 for the A-ToM social and physical scales, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Component 2 corresponded to a physical component, with all six purported physical items loading on this component (loadings 0.59 to 0.41), as did two items (party and bunnies) with loadings of 0.40 and 0.53, which also loaded on the social component (loadings 0.69 and 0.36).

    “Component 2 corresponded to a physical component. All six of the purported physical items loaded on this component, with loadings ranging from 0.59 to 0.41, as did two items (party and bunnies) with loadings of 0.40 and 0.53, which also loaded on the social component, with loadings of 0.69 and 0.36.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The final A-ToM scale comprises six social and six physical items.

    “The six social and six physical items3 that comprised the final scale (after the psychometric analyses) can be accessed via the link below:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inter-rater reliability, using Cohen's kappa, was 0.77 for the 6-item A-ToM social scale and 0.88 for the 6-item A-ToM physical scale.

    “Inter-rater reliability, using Cohen’s kappa, was 0.77 for the 6-item A-ToM social scale and 0.88 for the 6-item A-ToM physical scale.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A parallel analysis indicated two components and the PCA was repeated to extract a two component solution.

    “The outcomes of this analysis indicated two components and the PCA was repeated to extract a two component solution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The correlations between the A-ToM social and physical sub-tests and the AQ50 were −0.004 and −0.045, respectively, for the ASD sample.

    “Interestingly, the respective correlations between the A-ToM social and physical sub-tests and the AQ50, which we used as a filler task, were −0.004 and −0.045, respectively, for the ASD sample”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The CI and effect size statistics in Table 3 suggest that the ASD sample performed worse than controls on the A-ToM social sub-test, with the group difference effect size much lower for the A-ToM physical sub-test.

    “The CI and effect size statistics shown in Table 3 suggest that the ASD sample performed worse than the controls on the A-ToM social sub-test, with the group difference effect size much lower for the A-ToM physical sub-test.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After item-pool reduction, the social items did not emerge as significantly more difficult overall than the physical items for either the ASD sample (M = 0.61, SD = 0.21 vs. M = 0.55, SD = 0.16; t(10) = 0.57, p = .58) or the non-ASD controls (M = 0.76, SD = 0.21 vs. M = 0.61, SD = 0.14; t(10) = 1.45, p = .18).

    “Importantly, the outcome of the reduction of the item pool was such that the social items did not emerge as significantly more difficult overall than the physical items (contrary to what Fletcher et al. 1995, had found for the original Strange Stories physical items) for either the ASD sample (M = 0.61, SD = 0.21 vs. M = 0.55, SD = 0.16), t (10) = 0.57, p = .58, or the non-ASD controls (M = 0.76,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fletcher et al. 1995 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although some participants in both groups were close to or at ceiling on the social sub-test, this pattern was less marked for ASD participants, and extremely low social scores were more prevalent for ASD participants.

    “Although some participants in both groups were close to or at ceiling on the social sub-test, this pattern was less marked for the ASD participants. Moreover, extremely low social scores were more prevalent for ASD participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The final six social items included examples of faux pas (1), sarcasm (2), white lie (1), bluff or persuasion (1) and perspective taking or misunderstanding (1).

    “The final six items included examples of faux pas (1), sarcasm (2), white lie (1), bluff or persuasion (1) and perspective taking or misunderstanding (1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    VCI did not predict group membership, but after controlling for VCI, the Strange Stories social score did, with each one-unit increase on the social scale increasing the odds of being classified as a control group member by a factor of 1.46.

    “The VCI did not predict group membership but, after controlling for VCI, the Strange Stories social score did, with each increase of one-unit on the social scale increasing the odds of being classified as a control group member by a factor of 1.46.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The trend was for correlations with VCI to be a little stronger than for PRI.

    “As Tables 6, 7 and 8 shows, the trend was for correlations with VCI to be a little stronger than for PRI, and for the social-VCI correlation to be a little stronger for the Strange Stories than for the A-ToM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the Frith-Happé animations, effect size indices suggest small group differences in the expected directions on the mental and feelings categorization scales, but not on the random or goal-directed scales.

    “For the Frith- Happé animations, the other instrument included to examine convergent validity, the effect size indices shown in Table 3 suggest small group differences, in the expected directions, on the mental and feelings categorization (but not the random or goal-directed) scales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the Strange Stories, the CI and effect size patterns for the social sub-test were similar to those for the A-ToM, with the two groups clearly differentiated on the social sub-test.

    “For the Strange Stories, the CI and effect size patterns for the social sub-test were similar in nature to those for the A-ToM, with the two groups clearly differentiated on the social sub-test.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some individuals with ASD had little difficulty interpreting social interactions accurately, while others were quite markedly impaired.

    “Some individuals clearly had little difficulty interpreting the social interactions accurately; others were quite markedly impaired.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although the ASD group performed worse on the mental and feelings measures of the Frith-Happé animations, the effect sizes were relatively weak and the differences were not significant with VCI controlled.

    “Although the ASD group performed worse on the mental and feelings measures of the Frith-Happé animations, the effect sizes were relatively weak and the differences were not significant with VCI controlled.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Despite clear group differentiation on the A-ToM social scale, variability in ToM performance within the ASD sample was substantial.

    “Despite the clear group differentiation on the A-ToM social scale, the variability in ToM performance within the ASD sample was substantial.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The expected group differences emerged on the empathy and social anxiety scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the mini-SPIN, yet these measures were uncorrelated with the A-ToM social scale.

    “Second, the expected group differences emerged on the empathy and social anxiety scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the mini-SPIN, yet these measures were uncorrelated with the A-ToM social scale.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Davis 1983 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Connor et al. 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On the Strange Stories, the groups were clearly differentiated on the social scale, but they were also differentiated on the physical scale.

    “On the Strange Stories, the groups were clearly differentiated on the social scale–but they were also differentiated on the physical scale and the differentiation on both scales persisted after controlling for VCI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    VCI was used as a covariate in analyses.

    “Accordingly, the VCI was used as a covariate in analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Frith (2004) suggested that much of the apparent variability in ToM test performance in adult samples may reflect the extent to which the task allows an individual to hack out a solution to a problem.

    “In a similar vein, Frith (2004) suggested that much of the apparent variability in ToM test performance that may be seen in adult samples may reflect the extent to which the task allows an individual to hack out a solution to a problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Frith (2004) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Persons with ASD have unique cognitive profiles and matching with typical controls is difficult.

    “We acknowledge that persons with ASD have unique cognitive profiles and matching with typical controls is difficult; thus, the use of scales such as the Wechsler Scales is preferred as it taps the diversity in abilities (cf. Mottron 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mottron 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The 25 scenarios were incorporated into a VLC Media Player playlist in a random order, with four different randomly-ordered versions created for counterbalancing purposes and social and physical videos distributed randomly throughout each version.

    “The 25 scenarios were incorporated into a VLC Media Player playlist in a random order. Four different randomly-ordered versions were created for counterbalancing purposes, with social and physical videos distributed randomly throughout each version.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    A Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure (KMO = 0.82) exceeding 0.6 and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity, χ2(66) = 364.7, p < .001, confirmed the adequacy of the sample size and the correlations between items.

    “A Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure (KMO = 0.82) exceeding 0.6 (Tabachnick and Fidell 2001) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity, χ 2 (66) = 364.7, p < .001, respectively, confirmed the adequacy of the sample size and the correlations between items.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tabachnick and Fidell 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Performance IQ was the preferred match because it is less affected by verbal demands and thought to be a purer reflection of IQ.

    “Performance IQ was our preferred match as it is less affected by the verbal demands of the test and thus thought to be a purer reflection of IQ.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    White et al. (2011) found that adults with ASD were less effective than age and IQ-matched controls at identifying mental state interactions and categorizing emotions.

    “White et al. (2011) found that adults with ASD were less effective than age and IQ-matched controls at identifying mental state interactions and categorizing emotions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites White et al. (2011) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Selection of the 60 s interval was based on a pilot study in which 25 upper-level psychology students were group-tested, recording the time it took for most of the group to complete their response to each question.

    “Selection of this interval was based on a pilot study in which we group-tested 25 upper-level psychology students, recording the time it took for most of the group to complete their response to each question.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The WASI-II Block Design and Matrix Reasoning subtests make up the Perceptual Reasoning component, while the Vocabulary and Similarities subtests make up the Verbal Comprehension component.

    “The Block Design and Matrix Reasoning subtests make up the Perceptual Reasoning component, while the Vocabulary and Similarities subtests make up the Verbal Comprehension component.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Mini-SPIN is a three item, self-report screener for generalized social anxiety disorder.

    “The Mini-SPIN–based on an item analysis of the Social Phobia Inventory (see Connor et al. 2001, for psychometric data)–is a three item, self-report screener for generalized social anxiety disorder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Connor et al. 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The two convergent validity measures used were the Strange Stories test and the Frith-Happé animations.

    “The two measures used were the Strange Stories test and the Frith-Happé animations (White et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites White et al. 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants' answers were rated on a 0-2 scale (0 = incorrect, 1 = partially correct, 2 = correct), with scoring criteria providing examples for each answer type for each item.

    “Participants’ answers were rated on a 0–2 scale: 0 (incorrect), 1 (partially correct) or 2 (correct), with the scoring criteria providing examples for each answer type provided for each item”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The remaining 12 ASD participants were diagnosed by a psychologist recognized by the local agency or by two qualified diagnosticians.

    “The other 12 participants were diagnosed either by a psychologist recognized by the local agency or by two qualified diagnosticians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The use of scales such as the Wechsler Scales is preferred for matching because it taps the diversity in abilities.

    “We acknowledge that persons with ASD have unique cognitive profiles and matching with typical controls is difficult; thus, the use of scales such as the Wechsler Scales is preferred as it taps the diversity in abilities (cf. Mottron 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mottron 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants were instructed at the beginning of the task that they would have 60 s in which to record their response for each question.

    “Participants were instructed at the beginning of the task that they would have 60 s in which to record their response for each question.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reliability and validity data for the WASI-II are reported in McCrimmon & Smith (2012).

    “Reliability and validity data are reported in McCrimmon & Smith (2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCrimmon & Smith (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All but 12 ASD participants were diagnosed by two qualified diagnosticians and met DSM-IV-TR criteria.

    “All but 12 participants were registered with the local agency that coordinates statewide assessment and provision of services. All individuals registered with the local agency had been diagnosed by two qualified diagnosticians and met DSM-IV-TR [APA 2000] criteria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites APA 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Interpersonal Reactivity Index comprises four seven-item, self-report sub-scales which tap four different aspects of empathy.

    “The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (see Davis 1983, for reliability and construct validity data) comprises four seven-item, self-report sub-scales which tap four different aspects of empathy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davis 1983 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    To assess inter-rater reliability, two observers blind to participant group studied and practiced with the scoring protocols and, after training, scored 30% (N = 73) of the response sheets.

    “To assess inter-rater reliability for the A-ToM and the Strange Stories, two observers (blind to participant’s group) studied, and practiced with, the scoring protocols and, after training, scored 30% (N = 73) of the response sheets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although verbal IQ contributed to group differences, the A-ToM social, but not the physical, sub-test discriminated the ASD from the non-ASD sample, thereby meeting one of the expectations for the instrument.

    “In sum, although verbal IQ clearly contributed to group differences (see Table 5), the A-ToM social, but not the physical, sub-test discriminated the ASD from the non-ASD sample, thereby meeting one of the expectations for the instrument.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    To examine stability of the A-ToM, 40 individuals were retested by one of the two administrators at intervals ranging from 2 to 83 weeks (M = 23.7 weeks, SD = 23.4 weeks).

    “To examine stability of the A-ToM, 40 individuals were retested by one of the two administrators at intervals ranging from 2 to 83 weeks (M = 23.7 weeks, SD = 23.4 weeks).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    All physical items were based on, or adapted from, items described in Happé (1999).

    “All physical items were based on, or adapted from, items described in Happé (1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Happé (1999)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    For the Strange Stories, even after removing VCI, group membership was differentiated by both the social and physical sub-tests rather than by the social sub-test alone, which undermines the discriminative capacity of the Strange Stories for adult samples.

    “Thus, for the Strange Stories, even after removing VCI, group membership was differentiated by both the social and physical sub-tests rather than by the social sub-test alone, a finding which undermines the discriminative capacity of the Strange Stories for adult samples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Three of the six final social items were based on, or adapted from, items described in Happé (1999), and the other three were from the pool developed for this study.

    “Three of these six items were based on, or adapted from, items described in Happé (1999), and the other three items were from the pool developed for this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Happé (1999)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    There were clear group differences but also marked variability within groups on the A-ToM social sub-test.

    “In other words, there were clear group differences but there was also marked variability within groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The presentation order of the A-ToM and Strange Stories was counterbalanced.

    “The presentation order of the A-ToM and Strange Stories was counterbalanced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    There were two test administrators, both of whom had completed honors level studies in psychology.

    “There were two test administrators, both of whom had completed honors level studies in psychology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If lack of a ToM deficit does not preclude diagnosis, it would call into question whether a ToM deficit should be considered a core feature of the disorder, at least in adulthood.

    “If indeed this proved to be the case it would call into question whether a ToM deficit should be considered a core feature of the disorder (at least in adulthood).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    While a ToM deficit may be indicative of ASD in adults, the lack of one (at least as detected on an instrument such as the A-ToM) may not preclude a diagnosis.

    “Thus, while a ToM deficit may be indicative of ASD in adults, the lack of one (at least as detected on an instrument such as the A-ToM) may not preclude a diagnosis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Examinees are likely to perceive the A-ToM scenarios as realistic (face validity), although this was not formally assessed.

    “Moreover, the characteristics of the stimuli are such that examinees are likely to perceive the scenarios as realistic (i.e., as having face validity, although we did not formally assess this), thereby providing a plausible starting point for client-clinician discussions about the nuances of social interaction and the interpretation of the interpersonal behaviors of others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
51 of 51
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Deficits in Theory of Mind undermine the ability of individuals with ASD to interact in socially normative ways.

    “Deficits in Theory of Mind (ToM)—the ability to interpret others’ beliefs, intentions and emotions—undermine the ability of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to interact in socially normative ways.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no universally accepted operationalization of ToM.

    “Numerous instruments have been developed to measure ToM, or some aspect(s) of ToM, in individuals with ASD, although there has been no universally accepted operationalization of ToM.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Administration of existing ToM instruments has not been standardized and a number of variants have been used.

    “A key limitation is that the administration of the instruments has not been standardized and a number of variants of the tests have been used.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the absence of a standardized tool used with large sample sizes, a close psychometric evaluation is not possible.

    “In the absence of a standardized tool used with large sample sizes, a close psychometric evaluation that would normally be associated with the development of an assessment tool is not possible.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many ToM instruments used in ASD research were developed to explore hypotheses about the nature of deficits rather than to provide a formal assessment device, so psychometric analysis was not on the test developers' agendas.

    “First, many of the ToM instruments used in research with participants with ASD were developed to explore hypotheses about the nature of deficits in ASD rather than to provide a formal assessment device akin to an intelligence or personality test. Consequently, a probing psychometric analysis was not on the test developers’ agendas.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Researchers generally find it extremely difficult to access the number of individuals with ASD that would make a psychometric exercise viable, so reliable normative data are non-existent.

    “Second, researchers generally find it extremely difficult to access the number of individuals with ASD that would make such a psychometric exercise viable. Consequently, reliable normative data are non-existent.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a paucity of empirical data on the extent and variability of ToM deficits in adults with ASD.

    “Put simply, there is a paucity of empirical data on the extent and variability of ToM deficits in adults with ASD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Interpersonal Reactivity Index and Mini-SPIN do not involve the type of social-cognitive reasoning associated with reading the subtleties of an unfolding social interaction.

    “they do not appear to involve the type of social-cognitive reasoning associated with reading the subtleties of an unfolding social interaction.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(241) = 4.15reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (241) = 4.15, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(10) = 0.57reported p = .58 · recomputed p = .581

    “t (10) = 0.57, p = .58”

  • Consistentt(10) = 1.45reported p = .18 · recomputed p = .178

    “t (10) = 1.45, p = .18”

  • Consistentχ²(66) = 364.7reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “χ 2 (66) = 364.7, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(240) = 5.57reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (240) = 5.57, p < .001”

5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Logistic-regression results are attributed to the wrong table

    Minor

    The text directs readers to Table 5 for regression coefficients and odds ratios, but Table 5 contains score frequencies. Those regression results appear in Table 4.

  • ASD physical-score frequencies total 158, not 163

    Minor

    The frequencies across the 13 physical-score categories sum to 158, five fewer than the stated ASD sample of 163. The final cumulative proportion is therefore not 1 as printed.

    Reported 163 · recomputed 158

  • A-ToM physical score is described as both significant and nonsignificant

    Minor

    One results paragraph says the A-ToM physical score did not significantly predict group membership; a later paragraph says it did. The later paragraph discusses Strange Stories and appears to name the wrong physical score.

  • Strange Stories physical mean does not match its confidence interval

    Minor

    The reported non-ASD physical mean is 14.1, but its confidence interval, [13.2, 14.1], is centered at 13.65. The other reported confidence intervals are approximately centered on their means.

    Reported 14.1 · recomputed 13.65

  • Identical Strange Stories summary statistics have different effect sizes

    Minor

    The social and physical Strange Stories rows give identical group means and SDs, yet report different Cohen's d values, 0.76 and 0.54. Those identical inputs cannot produce both effect sizes.

5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brewer, N., & Young, R. L. (2015). Crime and autism spectrum disorder: Myths and mechanisms. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brewer, N., Young, R. L., & Barnett, E.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Brewer, Neil
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2017-03-09
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
1927-1941
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2591658426
Cited by
122
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Flinders Research Grants
  • Hamish Ramsay Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
theory of mind, autism spectrum disorder, psychometric validation, video scenarios, social cognition, empathy, social anxiety, autistic adults
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Empathy, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Psychometrics, Theory of Mind, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review