Cited by 450Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensory and attention abnormalities in autistic spectrum disorders

Abstract

Individuals with autistic spectrum disorders (ASDs) often experience, describe and exhibit unusual patterns of sensation and attention. These anomalies have been hypothesized to result from overarousal and consequent overfocused attention. Parents of individuals with ASD rated items in three domains, 'sensory overreactivity', 'sensory underreactivity' and 'sensory seeking behaviors', of an expanded version of the Sensory Profile, a 103-item rating scale developed for the present study. Parents also rated symptom severity, overselective attention and exceptional memory, and completed the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Of 222 rated subjects, 144 had complete data. Cluster analysis showed the predicted overfocused pattern of sensation and attention, comprising overreactivity, perseverative behavior and interests, overfocused attention and exceptional memory in 43 percent of this sample. This pattern was striking in 10 percent. The neurological basis of overreactivity and overfocusing is discussed in relation to the overarousal hypothesis. Attention is drawn to its considerable prevalence in the ASD population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361306062021

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. BANNON, M. J., 1983, Pharmacological Review, 35, 53
  2. DUNN, W., 1999, Sensory Profile, User’s Manual
  3. GILLINGHAM, G., 2000, Autism: A New Understanding
  4. LISS, M., 1998, The Sensory Survey
  5. ORNITZ, E., 1988, Brain Dysfunction, 1, 309
  6. SAULNIER, C., 2nd Annual International Meeting for Autism Research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 449

Metadata

Authors
Liss, M., Saulnier, C., Fein, D., & Kinsbourne, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Mary Washington (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • The New School (US)
Venue
Autism
Published
2006-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
155-172
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2137694551
Cited by
450
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 22
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sensory seeking, exceptional memory, perseveration, sensory profile, adaptive behavior, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Autistic Disorder, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Sensation Disorders, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Cluster Analysis, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review