Cited by 287Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of the Infant-Toddler Checklist as a broadband screener for autism spectrum disorders from 9 to 24 months of age.

Open access

Abstract

There is an urgent requirement for the improvement of early detection of ASDs. This article provides a brief review of research on the accuracy of screeners for children with ASD that have been administered to general pediatric samples and then present results of a population-based study with a broadband screener to detect children with communication delays including children with ASD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361308094501

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Centers For Disease Control And Prevention, 2007, Surveillance Summaries, 56, 1
  2. Kleinman, J., Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  3. Le Couteur, A., 2003, Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R)
  4. Rutter, M., 2001, Social Communication Questionnaire Research
  5. US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, 2005, Twenty-Seventh Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
  6. Wetherby, A., 2004, SORF: Systematic Observation of Red Flags for Autism Spectrum Disorders in Young Children. Unpublished manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–284 of 284

Metadata

Authors
Wetherby, A. M., Brosnan-Maddox, S., Peace, V., & Newton, L.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wetherby, Amy M.
Venue
Autism
Published
2008-09
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
487-511
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2123409099
Cited by
287
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U10 DD000064, 1 U10DD000064)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC007462)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, early detection, autism screening, communication delay, toddlers, screening accuracy
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review