Cited by 49Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceSocial Skills and Education

A comparison of the trait emotional intelligence profiles of individuals with and without Asperger syndrome

Petrides, KV, Hudry, Kristelle, Michalaria, Georgia, Swami, Viren, Sevdalis, Nick·2011·Autism

Abstract

The extent to which the socioemotional impairments of Asperger syndrome (AS) might be extreme manifestations of individual differences within the general population remains under-explored. We compared the trait emotional intelligence (trait EI) profiles of 30 individuals with AS against the profiles of 43 group-matched controls using the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). Participants with AS scored significantly lower than controls on 12 of the 15 TEIQue facets (η p 2 = 0.09 to 0.49) as well as on all four factors and the global score of the construct (η p 2 = 0.07 to 0.41). There was a significant main effect of gender, with men generally scoring higher than women. Results are discussed from the perspective of trait EI theory, with emphasis on its implications for the socioemotional impairments associated with AS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361310397217

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trait EI is a strong negative predictor of psychopathology in adults, including those with clinically diagnosed conditions such as Asperger syndrome and borderline personality disorder.

    “Trait EI is a strong negative predictor of psychopathology in adults too, including those with clinically diagnosed conditions, such as Asperger syndrome (Petrides, Hudry, Michalaria, Swami, & Sevdalis, 2011) and borderline personality disorder (Sinclair & Feigenbaum, 2012).”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Petrides, Hudry, Michalaria, Swami, & Sevdalis, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petrides, K., Hudry, K., Michalaria, G., Swami, V., & Sevdalis, N.
Affiliations
  • London Psychometric Laboratory, University College London, UK
  • Centre for Research in Autism and Education, Department of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of Education, UK
  • Department of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of Education, UK
  • HELP University (MY)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Autism
Published
2011-06-13
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
671-682
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2124855489
Cited by
49
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, trait emotional intelligence, individual differences, gender differences, TEIQue, autism spectrum disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Case-Control Studies, Self Efficacy, Asperger Syndrome, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review