The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault's `Panopticon' Revisited
Abstract
The article takes its point of departure in one limited and consciously selected aspect of Michel Foucault's use of Jeremy Bentham's concept of `Panopticon': in his book Discipline and Punish, the aspect of surveillance, and the emphasis on a fundamental change and break which presumably occurred in the 1800s from social and theatrical arrangements, where the many saw the few, to modern surveillance activities where the few see the many. It is maintained that Foucault contributes in an important way to our understanding of and sensitivity regarding modern surveillance systems and practices, which are expanding at an accelerating rate, but that he overlooks an opposite process of great significance which has occurred simultaneously and at an equally accelerated rate: the mass media, and especially television, which today bring the many — literally hundreds of millions of people at the same time — with great force to see and admire the few. In contrast to Foucault's panoptical process, the latter process is referred to as synoptical. Together, the processes situate us in a viewer society in a two-way and double sense. This article explores the developmental parallels and relationships between Panopticon and Synopticon, as well as their reciprocal functions. It is maintained that the control and discipline of the `soul', that is, the creation of human beings who control themselves through self-control and who thus fit neatly into a so-called democratic capitalist society, is a task which is actually fulfilled by modern Synopticon, whereas Foucault saw it as a function of Panopticon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00071310020015280 · Cited by 2,244
Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences
Brighenti, A. (2007) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392107076079 · Cited by 675
Consuming Sport: Fans, Sport and Culture
Crawford, G. (2004) · International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-06-02-2004-b007 · Cited by 372
Seele, P. (2016) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0381-5 · Cited by 69
Conspicuous practice: self-surveillance and commodification in English education
Page, D. (2018) · International Studies in Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/09620214.2017.1351309 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- MATHIESEN, T.
- Venue
- Theoretical Criminology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-234
- ISSN
- 1362-4806 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7439
- OpenAlex
- W2077637481
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault's `Panopticon' Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1362480697001002003
- The paper
- MATHIESEN, T. (1997). The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault's `Panopticon' Revisited. Theoretical Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480697001002003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.