Cited by 40Global Educational Policies and ReformsEducational Assessment and ImprovementEducation, sociology, and vocational training

Conspicuous practice: self-surveillance and commodification in English education

Open access
Page, Damien·2018·International Studies in Sociology of Education

Abstract

Teachers in England have always been watched; only more recently have they been surveilled, with senior leaders, peers, students and stakeholders all collecting performance data. Yet surveillance in schools and colleges increasingly relies on watching the self, with teachers voluntarily participating in their own surveillance, making their practice visible for easy consumption by interested parties. This article builds on previous work on the surveillance of teachers to argue that this ‘conspicuous practice’ represents a convergence of surveillance and consumerism, with teachers being recreated as commodities and their own marketing agent, embodying the entrepreneurial self to maximise employability. Through social media such as Twitter and LinkedIn to exploiting open plan learning spaces, teachers engage in conspicuous practice for three main reasons: from fear, to avoid sanction; as a result of acculturation into commodified environments; as a means of routine resistance, employing the dramaturgical self for personal gain, to avoid work or re-appropriate professionalism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09620214.2017.1351309

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Aldridge, A. (2003) Consumption. Cambridge: Polity Press
  2. Ball, S.J. and Olmedo, A., (2013) Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54 (1), 85-96
  3. Barker, J. R. (1993) Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (3), 408-437
  4. Barry, J., Chandler, J. and Clark, H. (2001) Between the ivory tower and the academic assembly line, Journal of Management Studies, 38 (1), 87-101
  5. Bauman, Z. (2004) Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press
  6. Bauman, Z. (2007) Consuming life. Cambridge: Polity Press
  7. Bauman, Z. and Lyon, D. (2013) Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press
  8. Beck, U. (1992) Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). New York: Sage
  9. Bleakley, A. (1999) From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity, Studies in Higher Education, 24 (3), 315-330
  10. Casey, C. (1995) Work, Self and Society after Industrialism. London: Routledge
  11. Clegg, S. (1999) Professional education, reflective practice and feminism, International Journal of Inclusive Education 3(2), 167-179
  12. Collinson, D. (2003) Identities and insecurities: selves at work, Organization, 10 (3), 527-547
  13. Crozier, G. (1999) Parental involvement: who wants it? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 9 (3), 219-238
  14. Davies, B. and Bansel, P. (2007) Neoliberalism and education, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20 (3), 247-259
  15. De Certeau, M (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press
  16. Fleming, P. and Sewell, G. (2002) 'Looking for the good soldier, Svejk: alternative modalities of resistance in the contemporary workplace', Sociology, 36 (4), 857-873
  17. Foucault, M. (1991) Discipline and punish -the birth of the prison. London: Penguin
  18. Giddens, A. (1991) The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity
  19. Goffman, E (1974) The presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin
  20. Hassrick, E. M., and Schneider, B. (2009) Parent surveillance in schools: A question of social Class, American Journal of Education, 115 (2), 195-225
  21. Hudson, I. and Hudson, M. (2003) Removing the veil? Commodity fetishism, fair trade, and the environment, Organization & Environment, 16 (4), 413-430
  22. Jones, A. (2004) Risk anxiety, policy, and the spectre of sexual abuse in early childhood Education, Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 25 (3), 321-334
  23. Kroener, I. and Neyland, D. (2014) New technologies, security and surveillance. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty and D. Lyon (Eds) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. Oxon: Routledge
  24. Lake, R. and Carter, P. (2011) Neoliberalism and education: an introduction, Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 47(2), 107-110
  25. Leary, M.R. and Kowalski, R.M. (1990) Impression management: A literature review and two-component model, Psychological bulletin, 107(1), 34-47
  26. Lee, V. and Ready, D. (2007) Schools Within Schools: Possibilities and Pitfalls of High School Reform. New York: Teachers College Press
  27. Lee, A., and Cook, P. S. (2014) The conditions of exposure and immediacy: Internet surveillance and Generation Y, Journal of Sociology, Online First DOI:1440783314522870.14/01/15
  28. Locke, J. L. (2010) Eavesdropping: An Intimate History. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  29. Lyon, D. (2003) Surveillance as social sorting. In D. Lyon (Ed) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination. London: Routledge
  30. Lyon, D. (2006) The search for surveillance theories. In D. Lyon (Ed) Theorizing Surveillance. London: Routledge
  31. Lyon, D. (2010) Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies, International Political Sociology 4(4), 325-338
  32. Lyon, D., Haggerty, K. and Ball, K. (2014) Introducing surveillance studies. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty and D. Lyon (Eds) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. Oxon: Routledge
  33. Mathiesen, T. (1997) The viewer society: Michel Foucault's panopticon revisited, Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215-234
  34. McCraken, G. (1990) Culture and Consumption. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press
  35. Page, D. (2014a) Managing serious teacher misbehaviour, School Leadership and Management, 34(3), 269-283
  36. Page, D. (2014b) Desirable organisational masculinities: competition and entrepreneurialism in schools of construction in further education colleges, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(6), 895-913
  37. Page, D. (2015) The visibility and invisibility of performance management in schools, British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1031-1049
  38. Page, D. (2016a) Conceptualising the surveillance of teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education (online first) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01425692.2016.1218752?journalCode= cbse20 Page, D. (2016b) The multiple impacts of teacher misbehavior, Journal of Education Administration 54 (1), 2-18 · DOI
  39. Page, D. (2017) The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching. Journal of Education Policy 32 (1): 1-13
  40. Piper, H., and Smith, H. (2003) 'Touch' in educational and child care settings: dilemmas and Responses, British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 879-894
  41. Prasad A. and Prasad, P. (1998) Everyday struggles at the workplace: the nature and implications of routine resistance in contemporary organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 15(2), 225-257
  42. Rule, J. (2007) Social control and modern social structure. In S. Hier and J. Greenberg (Eds) The Surveillance Studies Reader. Berkshire: Open University Press
  43. Rutherford, J. (1990) A place called home: identity and the cultural politics of difference, in J. Rutherford (ed.) Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart Sachs, J. (2004) Watching yourself and others: touch, personal space and risk of harm in the Classroom, paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference, Melbourne, 2004
  44. Shakeshaft, C. (2013) Know the warning signs of educator sexual misconduct, Phi Delta Kappan 94(5), 8-13
  45. Singh, V. (2001) Impression management, commitment and gender: managing others' good Opinions, European Management Journal, 19(2), 183-194
  46. Singlehurst, D., Russell, J., and Greenhalgh, T. (2008) Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: an action research approach, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 383-393
  47. Smith, G.J.D. (2014) Surveillance work(ers). In K. Ball, K. Haggerty and D. Lyon (Eds) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. Oxon: Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Page, D.
Affiliations
Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Corresponding author
Page, Damien
Venue
International Studies in Sociology of Education
Published
2017-10-23
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
375-390
ISSN
  • 0962-0214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-5066
OpenAlex
W2765934673
Cited by
40
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5
FWCI
17.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Studies in Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bucks New University Repository (Bucks New University) (submittedVersion)
  • Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, sociology, and vocational training
Keywords
self-surveillance, conspicuous consumption, teacher professionalism, teacher employability, social media in teaching, resistance to surveillance, performance data, English schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review