CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52Gender, Feminism, and MediaStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘This is my cheating ex’: Gender and sexuality in revenge porn

Open access
Hearn, Jeff, Hall, Matthew·2019·Sexualities
DOI 10.1177/1363460718779965
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Revenge pornography is the online, and at times offline, non-consensual distribution, or sharing, of explicit images by ex-partners, partners, others, or hackers seeking revenge or entertainment. In this article, we discursively analyse a selected range of electronic written texts accompanying explicit images posted by self-identified straight/gay/lesbian (male-to-female, female-to-male, male-to-male, female-to-female postings) on a popular revenge pornography website ‘MyEx.com’. Situating our analysis in debates on gender and sexuality, we examine commonalities and differences in the complex and sometimes contradictory ways in which gender and sexuality are invoked in posters’ accounts of their motivations for revenge pornography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363460718779965

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Abrahams C (1994) The Hidden Victims: Children and Domestic Violence, London: NCH Action for Children.
  2. Antaki C and Widdicombe S (eds) (1998) Identities in Talk. London: SAGE.
  3. Barbee AP (1997) Troubled men. PsycCritiques 42(5): 420–421.
  4. Edwards D (1998) The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In: Antaki C, Widdicombe S (eds) Identities in Talk, London: SAGE, pp. 15–34.
  5. Empel E (2011) (XXX)potential impact: the future of the commercial sex industry in 2030. Manoa: Journal for Fried and Half Fried Ideas (About the Future) December. Available at: http://www.friedjournal.com/xxxpotential-impact-the-future-of-the-commercial-sex-industry-in-2030/ (accessed 27 November 2014).
  6. Gilbert J (2013) Materialities of text: Between the Codex and the Net. new formations: a journal of culture/theory/politics 78(1): 5–6. · DOI
  7. Hearn J (1998) The Violences of Men, London: SAGE.
  8. Hester S and Eglin P (eds) (1997) Culture and Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington DC: University Press of America.
  9. Hookway N (2008) Entering the blogosphere. Some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative Research 8(1): 91–98.
  10. Macdonald G (2013) Domestic Violence and Private Family Court Proceedings: Promoting Child Welfare or Promoting Contact? Research Paper Series # CASP8. Bath: University of Bath.
  11. Oxford English Online Dictionary (2015) ‘Bitch’. Available at: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/bitch (accessed 8 April 2015).
  12. Ptacek J (1988) Why do men batter their wives? In: Yllö K, Bograd M (eds) Feminist Persepctives on Wife Abuse, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 133–157.
  13. Puccio D, Havey A (2016) Sex, Likes and Social Media: Talking to Our Teens in the Digital Age, London: Vermilion.
  14. Richards L (2003) Findings from the Multi-agency Domestic Violence Murder Reviews in London, London: Metropolitan Police.
  15. US National Conference of State Legislature (2014) Revenge Porn. Available at: http://www.ncsl.org/research/telecommunications-and-information-technology/state-revenge-porn-legislation/ (accessed 4 April 2015).
  16. Whisnant R (2010) From Jekyll to Hyde: The grooming of male pornography consumers. In: Boyle K (ed.) Everyday Pornography, London: Routledge, pp. 114–133.
  17. Wilson M, Daly M (2002) Homicide, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  18. Wittgenstein L (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (trans. CK Ogden) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 52

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hearn, J., & Hall, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Hearn, Jeff
ORCID
Venue
Sexualities
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2018-11-14
Volume
22
Issue
5-6
Pages
860-882
ISSN
  • 1363-4607 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7382
DOI
10.1177/1363460718779965
OpenAlex
W2900561405
Semantic Scholar
3d2ff8ff395a785e53a0f07addec431cc3c3d1fa
Cited by
52
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Sexualities (publishedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
revenge porn, gender, sexuality, online harassment, sexual orientation, heterosexual identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review