The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Something a bit more personal”: Digital storytelling and intimacy among queer Black women
Abstract
Coming-out stories are important cultural texts wherein individuals articulate and interpret experiences of identifying as sexual minorities. Yet, much of the extant literature on coming-out stories examines narratives by white, middle-class gay men and lesbians. Critical inquiry into coming-out stories told by privileged queer subjects points to the formulaic and normative characteristics of their narratives, where sexual difference is downplayed or challenged. The goal of this article, then, is to ask whether and how coming-out narratives told by queer Black women conform to or depart from the “coming-out formula story.” Using an intersectional approach to narrative analysis, this article investigates the performative and discursive strategies that 50 women use in telling their coming-out stories on YouTube. Findings show that queer Black women’s use of intimate candor—the performative and discursive strategy of publicly revealing interior, often sexually explicit, aspects of the self—is a means through which women center desire and queerness; articulate a vision of queer Black womanhood; and complicate the coming-out formula.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Adams-Santos's (2020) analysis of coming out vlogs by African American queer women shows how these categories can be difficult to reconcile with one another due to the cultural expectation -informed by gender and religious scripts -that black women are 'respectable'.”
From ‘You're not supposed to be gay, you're black’: Analysing race and LGBTQ+ youth identity through an intersectional lens (2025) · cites this paper as Adams-Santos, 2020
In the citing paper
“Adams-Santos's (2020) intersectional approach to analysing these narratives facilitates an understanding of the specifically racialised and gendered nature of the women's discursive strategies and, thus, the fact that 'the motivations and meanings attached to enacting these strategies are unique to queer Black women' (1451).”
From ‘You're not supposed to be gay, you're black’: Analysing race and LGBTQ+ youth identity through an intersectional lens (2025) · cites this paper as Adams-Santos, 2020
In the citing paper
“Although Adams-Santos's participants do also engage in talk which moves beyond a concern for respectability, such as by being explicit about their sexual desires, she argues that, in doing so, they risk reinforcing the stereotype of black women as hypersexual; evidence of this is found in some of the women's descriptions of their own queer sexuality as 'dirty laundry' or 'nasty'.”
From ‘You're not supposed to be gay, you're black’: Analysing race and LGBTQ+ youth identity through an intersectional lens (2025) · cites this paper as Adams-Santos, 2020
Citations
Cites
Hogan, B. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610385893 · Cited by 1,318 · cited 1×
“As a video-sharing platform, YouTube allows storytellers to use their voices, bodies, physical settings, and technologies to virtually curate their stories (Hogan, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodological issues in grounded theory
Cutcliffe, J. R. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01430.x · Cited by 642 · cited 1×
“I therefore opted to use purposive sampling methods to construct a robust sample of 50 videos (Cutcliffe, 2000: 1477).”
MethodKnock, Knock . Who's There? The Imagined Audience
Litt, E. (2012) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 · Cited by 629
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1177/1363460716665783 · DOI
- Beer D and Burrows R (2007) Sociology and, of, and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online 12(5): 17. · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822389163 · DOI
- Berryman R and Kavka M (2018) Crying on YouTube: Vlogs, self-exposure and the productivity of negative affect. Convergence 24(1): 85–98. · DOI
- 10.1177/1363460713511101 · DOI
- 10.1177/1469540514521081 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01075.x · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226190518.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9780203309506 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0891241603259810 · DOI
- Dobson AS, Robards R and Carah N (2018) Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822383901-007 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822392828 · DOI
- 10.1353/aq.2019.0010 · DOI
- Goffman E, 1959, The Presentation of Everyday Life
- 10.1177/1363460713516785 · DOI
- Hammonds E, 1994, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 6, 126, 10.1215/10407391-6-2-3-126 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781474471770-012 · DOI
- Helsper EJ and Eynon R (2010) Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal 36(3): 503–520. · DOI · Paper page
- Higginbotham EB, 1993, Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880–1920
- 10.1177/1363460714550900 · DOI
- 10.1086/494552 · DOI
- Holland M, 2016, Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 7, 52
- 10.1215/23289252-2815255 · DOI
- Hunter MA (2010) All the gays are White and all the Blacks are straight: Black gay men, identity, and community. Sexuality Research & Social Policy (7): 81–92. · DOI
- 10.1057/9781137297792_2 · DOI
- Jenkins CM, 2007, Private Lives, Proper Relations: Regulating Black Intimacy
- Jones C and Czerniewicz L (2010) Describing or debunking? The net generation and digital natives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26(5): 317–320. · DOI
- 10.1177/1363460715583585 · DOI
- Kohler Riessman C, 2005, Narrative, Memory and Everyday Life, 1
- 10.4324/9780203102329 · DOI
- Lorde A (1984) The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action. In Sister Outsider. Trumansberg, NY: Crossing Press, pp. 40–44.
- Loseke D, 2017, Social Problems: Constructionist Readings
- 10.1177/1367877917720237 · DOI
- Lupton D (2016) Digital Risk Society. In: Burgess A, Alemanno A and Zinn J (eds) Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 301–309.
- 10.1080/0740770X.2011.563048 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444810365313 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1470357203002002004 · DOI
- Miguel C (2016) Visual Intimacy on Social Media: From Selfies to the Co-Construction of Intimacies Through Shared Pictures. Social Media + Society 2(2): 1–10. · DOI
- 10.1525/9780520950153 · DOI
- Moreno MA, Goniu N, Moreno PS, et al. (2013) Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 16(9): 708–713. · DOI
- Morgan J (2015) Why We Get Off: Moving Towards a Black Feminist Politics of Pleasure. The Black Scholar 45(4): 36–46. · DOI
- 10.1353/fem.2012.0008 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203425268 · DOI
- 10.1080/10304312.2010.506672 · DOI
- Purdie-Vaughns V and Eibach RP (2008) Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 59(5-6): 377–391. · DOI
- Raun T (2012) DIY Therapy: Exploring Affective Self-Representations in Trans Video Blogs on YouTube. In: Karatzogianni A and Kuntsman A (eds) Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 165–180. · DOI
- 10.1177/1367877913513696 · DOI
- 10.1002/ace.370 · DOI
- 10.1504/IJWBC.2010.033755 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10508-006-8996-8 · DOI
- 10.3138/9781442687035 · DOI
- 10.1177/1363460717713381 · DOI
- 10.1177/1363460708091742 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jones, L. (2025) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12676 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams-Santos, D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University, USA
- Venue
- Sexualities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-03-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1434-1456
- ISSN
- 1363-4607 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7382
- OpenAlex
- W3009460457
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sexualities (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Keywords
- Black queer women, digital storytelling, intimacy, YouTube, intersectionality, performative strategies, discursive strategies, sexual difference, desire, sexual minority identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review