Cited by 64Mental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Patient InvolvementCommunity Health and Development

Understanding the benefits and challenges of community engagement in the development of community mental health services for common mental disorders: Lessons from a case study in a rural South African subdistrict site

Petersen, Inge, Baillie, Kim, Bhana, Arvin, Mental Health and Poverty Research Programme Consortium·2012·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

Against the backdrop of a large treatment gap for mental disorders in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), the 2007 Lancet series on global mental health calls for a scaling up of mental health services. Community participation is largely harnessed as one strategy to facilitate this call. Using a participatory implementation framework for the development of mental health services for common mental disorders (CMDs) in a rural subdistrict in South Africa as a case study, this study sought to understand the benefits and challenges of community participation beyond that of scaling up. Qualitative process evaluation involving interviews with service providers and users was employed. The results suggest that in addition to promoting mobilization of resources and actions for scaling up mental health services, community participation can potentially contribute to more culturally competent services and personal empowerment of recipients of care. In addition, community participation holds promise for engendering community-led public health actions to ameliorate some of the social determinants of mental ill health. Challenges include that community members involved in these activities are mainly marginalized women, who have limited power to achieve structural change, including cultural practices that may be harmful to the mental health of women and children. We conclude that in addition to contributing to scaling up mental health services, community participation can potentially promote the development of culturally competent mental health services and greater community control of mental health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363461512448375

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, I., Baillie, K., Bhana, A., & Mental Health and Poverty Research Programme Consortium
Affiliations
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • Human Sciences Research Council (ZA)
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2012-07
Volume
49
Issue
3-4
Pages
418-437
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W2083562945
Cited by
64
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (GR065377MA)
  • Department for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
community participation, community mental health services, common mental disorders, scaling up mental health services, culturally competent mental health services, women's empowerment, marginalized women, rural South Africa, treatment gap, participatory implementation
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Community Participation, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Patient Participation, Rural Population, South Africa, Focus Groups, Organizational Case Studies, Cultural Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review