Cited by 55Mental Health Treatment and AccessCultural Competency in Health CareTreatment of Major Depression

Toward a cultural adaptation of pharmacotherapy: Latino views of depression and antidepressant therapy

Open access
Vargas, Sylvanna M., Cabassa, Leopoldo J., Nicasio, Andel, De La Cruz, Ana Alicia, Jackson, Elizabeth, Rosario, Melissa, Guarnaccia, Peter J., Lewis-Fernández, Roberto·2015·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

Relative to non-Latino Whites, Latinos in the United States with major depressive disorder (MDD) show low engagement in antidepressant therapy, whether engagement is defined as pharmacotherapy access, medication initiation, pill-taking, or treatment retention. One potential reason for this disparity in depression care is the low cultural congruence of pharmacotherapy for this population. To examine Latinos’ views of depression and antidepressant therapy, we conducted qualitative interviews with 30 Latino outpatients initiating antidepressants prior to their first treatment visit using the semistructured Treatment Adherence and Retention Questionnaire. These baseline interviews were randomly selected from data collected for a randomized controlled trial testing a novel intervention to enhance engagement by depressed Latino outpatients. Participant narratives were analyzed using open coding and the iterative analytical approach derived from grounded theory. Patient views about depression addressed stigmatizing views held by others in their social circle. Most participants directly refuted these views by providing alternate explanations to depression experiences. Antidepressant therapy narratives also revealed marked stigmatization, but participants tended not to refute these views. Instead, patients expressed concerns about antidepressants and showed marked ambivalence about seeking psychiatric care. Participants, however, did suggest ways in which clinicians and patients might collaborate to address their concerns about antidepressants. Some cultural views, such as concerns about addiction to or dependence on medication, may be negotiable barriers to treatment. Prescribing clinicians should address cultural views and concerns in order to improve Latino engagement in antidepressant therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363461515574159

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resistance to psychiatric medication is likely higher among Latinx who often report stigmatizing attitudes toward psychopharmacology.

    “Many women will not consider taking psychiatric medications while pregnant (Cohen et al., 2010), and resistance is likely to be higher among Latinx who often report stigmatizing attitudes toward psychopharmacology (Vargas et al., 2015).”

    From Exposure Therapy Acceptability Among Pregnant Latinas With Anxiety: A Qualitative Content Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Vargas et al., 2015

    The passage under “Abstract” (page not given) reports lower engagement in antidepressant therapy among Latinos than non-Latino Whites with major depressive disorder. It also describes stigmatizing views of antidepressants and patients’ ambivalence about psychiatric care. It does not examine pregnancy or establish that resistance to psychiatric medication is higher among pregnant Latinx people than among other pregnant women. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vargas, S. M., Cabassa, L. J., Nicasio, A., De La Cruz, A. A., Jackson, E., Rosario, M., Guarnaccia, P. J., & Lewis-Fernández, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2015-03-03
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
244-273
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W2099860444
Cited by
55
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • New York State Office of Mental Health
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH066388, R01MH077226)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
Hispanic patients, major depressive disorder, antidepressant treatment, treatment engagement, stigma, medication concerns, cultural congruence
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Stereotyping, United States, Qualitative Research, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review