Cited by 76Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesInnovative Education and Learning PracticesAdult and Continuing Education Topics

The language of collaboration: Dialogue and identity in teacher professional development

Crafton, Linda, Kaiser, Eileen·2011·Improving Schools

Abstract

This article explores several professional development models currently being used in the US and in other countries to support teacher learning, including coaching, mentoring and communities of practice. While in some contexts the activities of the participants are informed by social constructivist views of learning, the authors argue that communities of practice offers the most promising lens for sustained growth and change. Two contrasting scenarios are presented offering a sharp illustration of the difference between a coach who assumes and maintains the position of expert, versus a consultant positioned as a collaborator and colleague in meaning-making through turn-taking and authentic dialogue. Literacy coaching and mentoring based on traditional definitions and practices may set the tone for professional development that diminishes the power and voice of teachers as agents for change — their own and that of their colleagues. This article emphasizes that it is the language of collaboration and dialogic processes that influence the development of learners within the community as it simultaneously shapes the identities of those who inquire within it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1365480211410437

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In school professional development contexts, where new understandings and practices are socially constructed, the co-construction of meaning is messy, filled with struggle, participant needs, tensions, ambiguity, and shifting power relationships.

    “Collective actions demand social interaction, yet in school PD contexts, where new understandings and practices are socially constructed, the”
  • Evidence of which aspects of PD interactions establish robust collectives of professional learning that may reliably change teachers' behaviours is elusive and messy.

    “the evidence of which aspects of PD interactions establish robust collectives of professional learning that may reliably change teachers' behaviours is more elusive (Desimone & Stuckey, 2014) and messy (Crafton & Kaiser, 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crafton, L., & Kaiser, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Parkside (US)
  • Northeastern Illinois University (US)
Corresponding author
Crafton, Linda
Venue
Improving Schools
Published
2011-07
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
104-116
ISSN
  • 1365-4802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7583
OpenAlex
W2090766081
Cited by
76
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Improving Schools (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Keywords
teacher professional development, communities of practice, coaching, mentoring, dialogic learning, teacher identity, collaboration, literacy coaching, social constructivism, teacher agency, turn-taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review