The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: A postfeminist sensibility 10 years on
Open accessAbstract
This article revisits the notion of ‘postfeminism’ 10 years after its formulation in critical terms as a sensibility characterizing cultural life. The article has two broad aims: first to reflect upon postfeminism as a critical term – as part of the lexicon of feminist scholarship – and second to discuss the current features of postfeminism as a sensibility. The first part of the article discusses the extraordinary uptake of the term and considers its continuing relevance in a changed context marked by deeply contradictory trends, including the resurgence of interest in feminism, alongside the spectacular visibility of misogyny, racism, homophobia and nationalism. I document a growing attention to the specificities of postfeminism, including attempts to map its temporal phases, its relevance to place, and intersectional developments of the term. The second part of the article examines the contours of the contemporary postfeminist sensibility. I argue that postfeminism has tightened its hold upon contemporary life and become hegemonic. Compared with a decade ago, it is much more difficult to recognize as a novel and distinctive sensibility, as it instantiates a common sense that operates as a kind of gendered neoliberalism. It has both spread out and intensified across contemporary culture and is becoming increasingly dependent upon a psychological register built around cultivating the ‘right’ kinds of dispositions for surviving in neoliberal society: confidence, resilience and positive mental attitude. Together these affective, cultural and psychic features of postfeminism exert a powerful regulatory force. This article forms part of ‘On the Move’, a special issue marking the twentieth anniversary of the journal. It also heads up a special online dossier on ‘Postfeminism in the European Journal of Cultural Studies’.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cultural object of choice, with its emphasis on individualism, subjectification and capitalism, masks the ways in which the empowerment of choice works to reinscribe dominant values.
“the cultural object of choice – with its emphasis on individualism, subjectification and capitalism – masks the ways in which the empowerment of choice works to reinscribe dominant values (Gill, 2017).”
From #My(white)BodyMyChoice (2023) · cites this paper as Gill, 2017
Cites
Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700113499853 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Do I Look Like My Selfie?”: Filters and the Digital-Forensic Gaze
Lavrence, C., & Cambre, C. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120955182 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Feminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed
Linabary, J. R., Corple, D. J., & Cooky, C. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819884635 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
‘A male dominance kind of vibe’: Approaching unsolicited dick pics as sexism
Amundsen, R. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820907025 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Warin, M., & Valdez, N. (2023) · Thesis Eleven · doi:10.1177/07255136231188186
- Authors
- Gill, R.
- Affiliations
- City, University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gill, Rosalind
- ORCID
- Gill, Rosalind
- Venue
- European Journal of Cultural Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-11-20
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 606-626
- ISSN
- 1367-5494 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3551
- OpenAlex
- W2768321702
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 80.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Cultural Studies (publishedVersion)
- Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- postfeminism, affect, psychic life, hegemony, intersectionality, resilience, positive mindset, common sense, misogyny, feminism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review