Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange
Open accessAbstract
This article explores gender inequities and sexual double standards in teens’ digital image exchange, drawing on a UK qualitative research project on youth ‘sexting’. We develop a critique of ‘postfeminist’ media cultures, suggesting teen ‘sexting’ presents specific age and gender related contradictions: teen girls are called upon to produce particular forms of ‘sexy’ self display, yet face legal repercussions, moral condemnation and ‘slut shaming’ when they do so. We examine the production/circulation of gendered value and sexual morality via teens’ discussions of activities on Facebook and Blackberry. For instance, some boys accumulated ‘ratings’ by possessing and exchanging images of girls’ breasts, which operated as a form of currency and value. Girls, in contrast, largely discussed the taking, sharing or posting of such images as risky, potentially inciting blame and shame around sexual reputation (e.g. being called ‘slut’, ‘slag’ or ‘sket’). The daily negotiations of these new digitally mediated, heterosexualised, classed and raced norms of performing teen feminine and masculine desirability are considered.
Verification finished with gaps
Some checks didn’t finish. The results below cover the steps that did.
- Registry recordVerified
- Full textRead the full text
- Reference list44 references found
- Reference check42 of 42 references checked
- StatisticsRecomputed
- Claims90 claims anchored to a quote
- Cited sourcesChecked
- Self-checkDidn’t finish — the rest of the report still applies.
- VerificationFindings verified
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 48 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchange
Part of the performance of masculinity includes a masculine code of honour of not revealing the faces of the images of girls a boy has been sent.
“Part of the performance of masculinity here includes what Kamal describes as a kind of masculine code of honour of not revealing the faces of the images of the girls he's been sent, although this possibility is potentially open to him, as explored next.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchange
Negotiating images contributes to a peer hierarchy where boys and girls stake out positions in the popularity ratings.
“Negotiating images contributes to a peer hierarchy where boys and girls stake out positions in the popularity ratings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchange
One way boys could gain ratings was by collecting, tagging, sending and showing pictures of girls' bodies, particularly their breasts.
“One way boys could gain ratings was by collecting, tagging, sending and showing pictures of girls' bodies, particularly their breasts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchange
There is value for Kaja in showing the visual currency and proof of images to friends, revealing his popularity and power.
“There is value for Kaja in showing the visual currency and proof of the images to his friends, revealing his popularity and power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodies
Pin broadcast descriptions on Blackberry Messenger encode sexual and gendered discourses.
“The description linked to the pin is an easy way in which pin broadcasts encode sexual and gendered discourses, as discussed by this year 8 girls' focus group:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodies
Girls in the focus group displayed camaraderie around 'bigging up' friends as attractive and desirable, aiming to help a girl get more primarily male contacts.
“As this exchange illustrates, there is a sense of camaraderie for the girls around 'bigging up' one's friends as attractive and desirable, the goal being to 'help' a girl to get more primarily male contacts, often from those not already known in person.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Explicit images of girls circulated among the teens as a form of digital currency and value for boys, who could accumulate ratings by possessing and exchanging certain images.
“The affective dimensions of this visual economy are also mapped out, illustrating how explicit images of girls (teen peer produced content) circulated as a form of digital currency and value for boys who could accumulate 'ratings' by possessing and exchanging certain images.”
- Also stated in: § Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchange · hedged
“One way boys could gain ratings was by collecting, tagging, sending and showing pictures of girls' bodies, particularly their breasts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchange · hedged
- Findingown data§ Abstract
Girls largely discussed taking or sharing self-images as a site of potential risk, blame and guilt around sexual reputation, such as being called 'slut', 'slag' or 'sket'.
“Girls in contrast largely discussed the taking or sharing of self-images as a site of potential risk, blame and guilt around sexual reputation (e.g.being called 'slut', 'slag' or 'sket').”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
Girls and boys interpret the making of images of girls' bodies through ranked moral codes tied to gender.
“Both girls and boys read the production of images of girls' bodies through hierarchical codes of gendered morality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Research methodology
Young people's digital sexual communication showed a blurring between pleasurable and coercive dimensions that troubles straightforward conclusions about empowerment or exploitation.
“But what we found through our discussions with young people was a blurring between pleasurable and coercive dimensions of digital sexual communication that troubles any straightforward conclusions regarding empowerment or exploitation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodies
The ambivalent pleasure of being asked for photos by new contacts is part of the ritual of Blackberry Messenger communication.
“The ambivalent pleasure of being asked for photos by new contacts is part of the ritual of BBM communication and here Jodie has come up with a ruse to avoid sending the photo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodies
It is mainly girls' bodies that are described in pin broadcasts.
“As boys explained further, it is mainly girls' bodies that are described in this way:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
The sexual double standard means that many boys, despite requesting images, label girls who send photos as 'sket' or 'slag'.
“The sexual double standard also means that, despite asking for images, many boys also categorized girls who send photos as 'sket' or 'slag', as illustrated by year 10 boys:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'
Boys treated images of girls as items with exchange value that boosted their popularity or 'ratings', since the images could be gathered and displayed to other boys.
“Images of girls were found to have exchange value for boys, contributing to their popularity or 'ratings' because they could be collected and shown to other boys.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Linking up: online meets offline
Young people navigate the possibility of 'linking' up, physically meeting, with a little-known or unknown new contact through BBM.
“Young people also navigate the possibilities of 'linking' up with (physically meeting) a little known or unknown new contact through BBM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Linking up: online meets offline
Photographic evidence of sexual promises or sexual practice gives boys value, in the form of ratings, among their peers.
“So, photographic evidence of sexual promises or, indeed, practice gives value (ratings) for boys in relation to their peers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
In a year 10 focus group, girls distinguished respectable peers, who denied sending photos or having sex, from 'skets', who lacked self-respect.
“These girls in a year 10 focus group worked hard to distinguish respectable girls, who would not admit to sending a photo (or, indeed, to having sex) from 'skets'girls who do not respect themselves:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodies
Girls' negotiation of moral discourses about sexual reputation and attractiveness when deciding whether to send images suggests a new norm of feminine desirability mediated by digital technology affordances.
“Indeed, since girls must negotiate moral discourses regarding their sexual reputation, and being attractive and wanted, when deciding whether to send images, this suggests a new norm of feminine desirability as mediated (though not determined; Buckingham,2008) by the affordances of digital technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buckingham,2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?
E-safety campaigns produce particular gendered 'sexting subjects'.
“E-safety campaigns, including Australia's 'tagged', Canada's 'Respect yourself' and the UK's 'Exposed' work in concert with these media forms, producing particular gendered 'sexting subjects' (Karaian, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karaian, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
Once an image leaves a girl's possession and reaches boys, it is treated as a reward that the boy may use well or badly.
“once the image passes out of her hands to the boys it is understood as a type of reward, which the boy can abuse or not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?
Legal discourses have produced a narrative of teen girls at risk of self-exploitation and in need of criminal regulation.
“Legal discourses have produced a particular narrative of teen girls at risk of self-exploitation and in need of criminal regulation (Karaian, 2012: 58).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karaian, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Research methodology
Most research on youth sexting has been quantitative, measuring prevalence and demographic characteristics.
“Most research on youth sexting has been quantitative, measuring its prevalence and demographic characteristics (Mitchell et. al, 2012;Livingstone and Gorzig, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mitchell et. al, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Livingstone and Gorzig, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
In the peer culture studied, when a boy acquires an image of a girl's body, he holds something valuable that she has produced for him.
“The affective dynamic of acquiring images of girls' bodies means the boy becomes the holder of something of value that the girl has done for him.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ Research methodology
Despite a modest number of schools and children, the researchers built sufficient rapport to gain deep insight into a diverse range of practices.
“Although the number of schools selected and children interviewed is modest, we were able to build sufficient rapport to gain a deep insight into a diverse range of practices, including: posting body photos on Facebook and Blackberry, broadcasting sexual pins through Blackberry, asking and being asked for photos and collecting photos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?
Strict moral boundaries around girls' but not boys' age-appropriate sexual expression are re-drawn through efforts to prevent sexting practices.
“In consequence, strict moral boundaries around girls' (but not boys') age-appropriate sexual expression are re-drawn through efforts to prevent sexting practices (Renold and Ringrose, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Renold and Ringrose, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Research methodology
Far less is known about the contexts and consequences of sexting as a social, cultural or digital practice.
“Far less is known about the contexts and consequences of sexting as a social, cultural or digital practice (Willard, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Willard, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'
Even in the academy, as in policy and educational responses to sexting, it is easier to accept the wider postfeminist context of sexism, sexual double standards and sexual regulation, in which girls must perform particular sexual scripts and images while risking shame, than to contest it.
“It seems that even in the academy, as in policy and educational responses to 'sexting' (noted at the outset of this article), it is easier to accept the wider 'postfeminist' social context of sexism, sexual double standards and sexual regulations, in which girls' are called upon to perform particular sexual scripts and images, and yet run the risk of their bodies and sexualities being marked as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ringrose and Renold, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'
A consequence is double victimisation: girls are silenced from reporting problems in school and out of school to adults for fear of being blamed or punished further.
“Arguably, the consequence is a double victimisation, as girls are silenced from reporting to adults the problems they face in school and out of school settings for fear of being blamed or punished further.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'
The authors argue that the most problematic aspect for young people is not age-inappropriate sexting risks but the contexts of gender inequity and sexual double standards they negotiate in everyday online and offline life.
“We have sought to move beyond sensationalist discourses of age-inappropriate sexting risks for teen-aged girls, arguing that what is most problematic for young people are the contexts of gender inequity and sexual double standards that they must negotiate as part of their everyday online and offline experiences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Linking up: online meets offline
Images of sexual acts performed on boys would be especially valuable for their sexual ratings.
“Of particular value for their sexual ratings would be the acquisition of images of sexual acts being performed on them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
The images and talk about their circulation help morally regulate classed, gendered and racialised bodies in participants' peer networks.
“The images, and the discussion of the circulation of them, play a role in the moral regulation of classed, gendered and racialised bodies within our participants' peer networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Linking up: online meets offline
Images can have further use-value for boys when they imply 'linking', meaning real offline sex.
“In addition to negotiations over image exchange, images can gain a further use-value for boys insofar as they imply 'linking' -'real' sex in the offline world:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
Images and comments can be seen as technologies of subjectification that repeatedly define what counts as acceptable sexuality for girls and boys.
“Both images and comments can be understood in terms of subjectifying technologies that repeatedly mark the boundaries of acceptable sexuality for girls and boys.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
Kylie's description of Demi uses markers of sexual value that are also strongly classed and linked to 'trashy' femininity.
“Her account of Demi includes signifiers of sexual value ('belly hanging out', piercings, 'spray tan', 'really revealing' clothes) that are also highly classed, linked to 'trashy' femininity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Duits and Van Zoonen, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bragg, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jensen and Ringrose, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shame
In this account, creating and sending sexual images marks the sender's body as lower value under dominant norms of classed and racialised femininity.
“Thus, in this account, the creation and sending of sexual images mark the sender's body as having less value within dominant norms of classed and racialised femininity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'
Digital technologies, especially BBM, compound these challenges by inscribing gendered morality onto girls' bodies, literally and virtually, within digitally mediated peer cultures.
“The use of digital technologies, here Blackberry Messenger in particular, compounds these challenges by inscribing a gendered morality onto girls' bodies, literally and virtually, within young people's digitally-mediated peer cultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
- May combine two claims. 41
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchangeTarek asks for pictures but never sends ones of himself.
“Tarek explains that while he asks for pictures he never sends ones of himself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchangeA picture has greater value the more popular and less likely a girl is to send it; gaining a scarce image demonstrates a boy's powers of persuasion or desirability.
“He adds that a picture has greater value the more popular and therefore less likely a girl is to send it -gaining a scarce image demonstrates his own powers of persuasion or desirability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodiesIt is taken by girls as a sign of attractiveness to be asked for a 'special photo', and there is a matching norm of desirable masculinity for boys to be able to negotiate the 'ask'.
“Specifically, it is taken by girls as a sign of their attractiveness to be asked for a 'special photo', just as there is a matching norm of desirable masculinity for boys to be able to negotiate the 'ask' for the photo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodies'Tits and bum' are the prime bodily properties in these descriptions, and they operate in racialised and classed ways.
“'Tits and bum' are the prime bodily properties, and these operate in racialised and classed ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchangeKaja and Kamal both talked about having 30 images on their phone, indicating a considerable degree of popularity and desirability.
“Kaja (year 10) and Kamal (year 8) both talked about having 30 images on their phone, indicating a considerable degree of popularity and desirability:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchangeHaving an image specially made for you is better than being sent one 'on file'.
“Also having an image specially made for you is better than being sent one 'on file', so to speak.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodiesDescriptions of girls in pin broadcasts generate interaction that enables going 'a step closer in the friendship'.
“However, he adds, the benefit of such descriptions of girls includes generating an interaction that enables going 'a step closer in the friendship.'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Linking up: online meets offlineIn one year 8 girls' focus group, participants discussed a boy in their network who had an image of a girl's head above a penis as his BBM default photo.
“Year 8 girls in one focus group discussed how a boy in their network currently had an image of a girl's head above a penis as his BBM default photo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameKaja describes the girl who tagged him as having 'no shame', while he both claims value from the picture and affectively distances himself from it and from her as 'nothing I ain't seen before'.
“As Kaja says, the girl who did this has 'no shame' (a moral marker about her sexuality) while he himself both claims value from the picture and affectively disclaims it (and her) as 'nothing I ain't seen before'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Linking up: online meets offlineCherelle deleted the contact but was left with the affective residue that he knew where she lived, and because BBM requests happened daily at school she insisted it was not a joke.
“Cherelle deleted the contact, but she was left with the affective residue that this contact 'knows' where she lives; and with BBM requests happening daily at school she was adamant it was 'not a joke'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Linking up: online meets offlineGirls in the study knew about 'stranger danger', and some regarded requests for sexual acts during 'linking' as threatening.
“The girls were very aware of 'stranger danger' (Guo, 2008), and some found requests for sexual acts if they 'linked' threatening.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guo, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Linking up: online meets offlineThe girls suggested that it was other, 'stupid' girls who might meet boys, not themselves.
“Still, they were inclined to suggest that other 'stupid' girls might meet up with guys but they wouldn't.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameBoys gain 'ratings' and 'respect' for requesting an image, while girls are called 'skets' for supplying it.
“As before, boys get 'rated' and 'respect' for asking for an image and girls get called 'skets' for supplying it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'Boys and girls alike called girls who sent images 'skets' and said they lacked self-respect, which fits familiar double standards.
“However, consonant with familiar double standards, both boys and girls and girls described girls who sent images as 'skets' who lack self-respect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameThe discussion shows a sexual double standard: boys are admired as 'sick' if seen to have sex, while girls who send images are called 'skets'.
“The discussion points to a sexual double standard -boys are 'sick' (a current term of admiration in the UK context) if they are seen (through photographic evidence, for instance) to have sex whereas the girls who send images are 'skets'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameAlthough both boys and girls are criticised, only girls are repeatedly called 'stupid'.
“Though both boys and girls are criticised, only the girls are called 'stupid' (repeatedly so by Irina).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameAlthough Demi's brother confronts the boy who keeps such photos, Kylie still places moral responsibility mainly on the girl who sent them, even while she also criticises boys' behaviour.
“And although Demi's brother seems to attack the boy who keeps such photos, Kylie still attributes moral responsibility primarily to the girl who sent them, notwithstanding her critique of boys' behaviour also.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameKaja shifts easily from saying girls who send pictures do not respect themselves to saying he would not respect them.
“Interestingly, Kaja moves easily from positioning girls who send pictures as not respecting themselves to explaining that he wouldn't respect them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameIn a competitive exchange game, boys use BBM to ask girls to write the boy's name on their body, and the best image would win and become his default photo.
“In competitive game of exchange, the boys use BBM to send requests for girls to write his name on their body, and the best image would win (and become his default photo).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?The idea that self-sexualising through sexting images puts girls at moral risk of exploitation works through the sexual double standard that positions girls' sexuality as pure and at risk of contamination through active desire and positions girls as responsible for protecting the virginal body from aggressive male sexuality.
“The idea that self-sexualising through sexting images puts girls at moral risk of exploitation works through the age-old sexual double standard that not only positions girls' sexuality as something pure and at risk of contamination through active desire (Jackson and Cram, 2003) but also positions girls as responsible for protecting the virginal body from hard-wired aggressive male sexuality (Holl”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jackson and Cram, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Holland et al., 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?The objectification and 'sexualisation' of men through widespread consumption of images of the ideal male body arguably results in a democratization of looking for women and men.
“In parallel, we are witnessing the objectification and 'sexualisation' of men, through widespread consumption of images of the ideal male body, arguably resulting in a democratization of looking for women (and men) (Gill et al., 2005;Gill,2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gill et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gill,2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?Some sexually explicit images of minors fall foul of laws on pornography, amplifying public anxieties over the sexualisation of childhood and girlhood.
“However, the fact that some of these images fall foul of laws on pornography (traditionally legal only if images of adults not minors) has amplified public anxieties over the sexualisation of childhood and girlhood (Arcabascio, 2010;Sacco et al., 2010;Wolak and Finkelhor, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Arcabascio, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sacco et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wolak and Finkelhor, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?The concept of 'postfeminism' helps unpack and critique a contemporary sensibility that positions society as 'beyond' feminism, where feminist goals of social and political equality are supposed to have been met, making feminism obsolete.
“The concept of 'postfeminism' helps unpack and critique a contemporary sensibility that positions society as 'beyond' feminism, where it is supposed that feminist goals of social and political equality have been met, making the need for feminism now obsolete (Gill, 2007;McRobbie, 2008;Ringrose, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gill, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McRobbie, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ringrose, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ AbstractOnline digital content and networks are inextricably linked to offline lives and experiences.
“The paper illustrates how online digital content and networks are inextricably linked to offline lives and experiences; and concludes by outlining the urgent need to address the gender inequity issues highlighted by practices of teen 'sexting'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ Research methodologyThe research received research ethics approval.
“Having negotiated access to the school, and gained research ethics approval, the (female) interviewersfoot_2 worked with children aged 12-13 (UK Year 8) and 14-15 (Year 10), inviting them to reflect on both present and earlier experiences since the start of their secondary education (which in the UK begins around 11 years old).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?The implicit message in anti-sexting narratives is that responsibility for an image lies with its producer or sender rather than its receiver, resulting in victim-blaming and 'slut shaming'.
“The implicit message in this and other anti-sexting narratives is that responsibility for an image lies with its producer/sender not its receiver, resulting in a form of victim-blaming (Hasinoff, 2012) that illustrates what commentators have called 'slut shaming ' (Albury, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hasinoff, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Albury, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Research methodologyYoung people are sexual beings with a right to communicate in privacy to explore sexuality, intimacy and relationships.
“Our starting point was the recognition young people are sexual beings with a right to communicate in privacy so as to explore their sexuality, intimacy and relationships (Lerum and Dworkin, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lerum and Dworkin, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Research methodologyPrevious youth and new media research reveals that young people are deeply attached to digital communication and technology and find digital flirtation and sexual communication pleasurable, exciting and fun.
“Previous youth and new media research reveals that young people are deeply attached to digital communication and technology and find digital flirtation and sexual communication pleasurable, exciting and fun (boyd, 2008;Livingstone, 2008), a vital part of the 'drama' of the peer culture (Marwick and boyd, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites boyd, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Livingstone, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Marwick and boyd, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Getting 'ratings': performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchangeAn image can be exchanged or looked upon by others, and it proves that a boy is himself both desired and desirous.
“Recall Skegg's (2004) deployment of the concepts of use-value and exchange-value as we map the multiple ways that value flows through these images in a heterosexualized, affective economy of flirting: an image can be exchanged or looked upon by others, and it proves that a boy is himself both desired and desirous.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skeggs, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ BBM Pin Broadcasts and describing girls' bodiesThe sexual double standard of female passivity and male action is replicated, but social implications are altered by affordances of sexting: persistence, manipulation, uncertain audiences, and possible illegality.
“While this replicates the familiar sexual double standard of female passivity and male action, the social implications are now altered because the affordances (boyd, 2008) of sexting include persistence (images once sent cannot be withdrawn or deleted), manipulation and uncertain audiences (they may be further edited or circulated), and even possible illegality (if sexually explicit).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites boyd, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?Within contemporary 'postfeminist' media culture, researchers have argued that the 'sexualisation' of the adult, particularly female body is taken for granted, normal and banal.
“Within this contemporary 'postfeminist' media culture, researchers have argued that the 'sexualisation' of the adult, particularly female body is, therefore, taken for granted, normal and banal (Atwood, 2009;Evans and Riley, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Atwood, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Evans and Riley, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Research methodologySurveys have found highly variable rates of sexting depending on what is measured.
“Surveys have found highly variable rates of sexting, depending on just what is being measured (Lounsbury, Mitchell, and Finkelhor, 2011), although USA, UK and EU research suggests that typically around 15 per cent of teenagers report sending or receiving sexual messages while only some 3 per cent admit to creating or sending nude images (Lenhart, 2009;Livingstone, et al, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lounsbury, Mitchell, and Finkelhor, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitation§ Research methodologyThe study used a multi-method design integrating focus groups, follow-up individual interviews with 35 young people, and analysis of their online posts on Facebook and Blackberry.
“Our multi-method design integrated focus groups and follow up individual interviews with 35 young people, together with an analysis of their online posts on Facebook and Blackberry (for details, see Ringrose, Gill, Livingstone and Harvey, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ringrose, Gill, Livingstone and Harvey, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Re-examining teen sexting practices and the construction of gendered value and moralitySocial networking sites enable the construction of a textual and visual cybersubjectivity that gains meaning through embedding in a digitally 'networked public'.
“Social networking sites enable the construction of a textual and visual cybersubjectivity that gains meaning through embedding in a digitally 'networked public' (boyd, 2008;Papacharissi, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites boyd, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Papacharissi, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Re-examining teen sexting practices and the construction of gendered value and moralityResearchers exploring gender dynamics on social networking sites argue that the architecture of the sites encourages visual, bodily 'objectification', with intensified forms of rating and comparison commonly practiced in relation to women though also found in the online 'gay' community.
“Researchers exploring gender dynamics on social networking sites argue that the very architecture of the sites encourages visual, bodily 'objectification', with intensified forms of rating and comparison commonly practiced in relation to women though also found in the online 'gay' community (Manago et al., 2009;Siiback, 2010;Dobson, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Manago et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Siiback, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dobson, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Research methodologyUSA, UK and EU research suggests typically around 15 per cent of teenagers report sending or receiving sexual messages while only about 3 per cent admit to creating or sending nude images.
“although USA, UK and EU research suggests that typically around 15 per cent of teenagers report sending or receiving sexual messages while only some 3 per cent admit to creating or sending nude images (Lenhart, 2009;Livingstone, et al, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lenhart, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Livingstone, et al, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Postfeminist looking, 'sexualisation' and 'sexting': What's the problem?In popular culture, second wave feminist critiques of sexual objectification are overturned through an increasing 'sexualisation of culture', where self-objectification for girls and women is re-interpreted as a site of sexual liberation, value and pleasure.
“Applying this concept to popular culture, research has explored how second wave feminist critiques of sexual objectification are overturned through what has been termed an increasing 'sexualisation of culture'.Here, self-objectification, particularly for girls and women, is re-interpreted not as oppressive but as constituting a prime site of sexual liberation, value and pleasure (Gill, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gill, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation§ Research methodologyThe study followed McClelland and Fine's (2008) 'intensity sampling', focusing on demonstrative cases to explore 'sexting' experiences in depth.
“Specifically, we followed McClelland and Fine's (2008) 'intensity sampling' where we focused on demonstrative cases to explore the 'sexting' experiences in depth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClelland and Fine's (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'This carries forward older gendered power relations that treat girls' bodies as implicit carriers of sexual morality, and the fit between technology's affordances and peer culture makes this more persuasive.
“This extends the reach of long-established gendered power relations according to which girls' bodies are configured as implicit bearers of sexual morality (McClintock, 1995), and is made all the more persuasive through the fit between the affordances of the technology and the nature of peer cultureambiguous in form yet able to produce competitive values, playful in style, yet harsh in its normat”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClintock, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'For boys, acquiring images can serve as proof of desirability and access to girls' bodies, forming new norms of masculinity and masculine performance.
“Meanwhile, for boys, acquiring images can work as proof of their desirability and access to girls' bodies, constituting new norms of masculinity and masculine performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameGirls conceal their sexual interest and desire, whereas boys' sexual interest and even aggressive, harassing propositions are treated as normal for successful masculinity.
“Thus girls find themselves hiding sexual interest and desire (Tolman, 2002(Tolman, , 2012) ) while boys' sexual interest and even aggressive, harassing propositioning is normalised as part of successful masculinity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tolman, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tolman, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'For girls to gain 'respect' from boys and girls, they must perform a complex femininity: gain value from being asked for images, appear to resist sending them, deny having sent them, and project blame onto 'other' stupid girls.
“Consequently, for girls to acquire 'respect' from both boys and girls means engaging in a complex performance of femininity where they gain value from being asked for images but have to be seen to resist sending images and deny the possibility of having done so, projecting this culpability onto 'other' stupid girls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Linking up: online meets offlineIn such scenarios, online and offline spheres are hard to separate, and the situation, legitimised by moral sexual double standards and aggressive masculinity, can threaten girls' safety and well-being.
“In such scenarios, the online and offline spheres become difficult to separate, and the potential exists for the situation, legitimised through moral sexual double standards and performances of aggressive masculinity, to threaten girls' safety and well-being.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'Although 'stranger danger' is rare, the concerns girls voice daily about gender and sexual inequality in popular and everyday culture are mostly not heard at school or home.
“In relation to e-safety campaigns, we observe that while 'stranger danger' (against which most children have now been warned) remains a rare threat, everyday girls' concerns about consequences of gender and sexual inequity in popular and everyday culture go largely unheard at school and home.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Stranger danger is a rare threat for young people.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'At the same time, these images mark girls' bodies as devalued, carry affects, and delimit the acceptable boundaries of desirable female sexuality.
“But they simultaneously mark out the girls' bodies as devalued, carrying a range of affects and working to delimit the acceptable boundaries of desirable female sexuality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Linking up: online meets offlineWhen Cherelle refused on BBM to meet up or join banter about oral sex, the boy seemed to take this as a threat to his masculinity and became furious.
“Here Cherelle's refusal on BBM to 'link up' or engage with banter around 'blows' seemed to threaten the boy's masculinity, at which point he 'became furious'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameAlthough sexual double standards are not new, digital technology creates new routes for value to move through images and to become materially marked on particular bodies.
“While such sexual double-standards are hardly new (Jackson and Cram, 2003), the technology provides new ways for value to circulate through images, becoming materially marked on particular bodies as part of that process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jackson and Cram, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Linking up: online meets offlineThe moral logic in the accounts is that the girl is responsible for performing the sexual act and also implicated herself by getting upset, so she is doubly condemned.
“The moral logic presented here is that, firstly, the girl is responsible for having performed the sexual act and, secondly, she has implicated herself by getting upset.She is doubly condemned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameGirls write a boy's name on their cleavage, marking their bodies as property of particular boys, and tagging lets boys claim value from the posted picture.
“Girls inscribe their cleavage with a boy's name, marking an inscribing their bodies as 'property' of particular boys, and 'tagging' allows the boys to claim value from the picture when posted online.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameThe image becomes shameful because it links the girl to promiscuity, and this shame can also travel to the boy who engages with it, which is why Kaja works to distance himself from a relationship with the girl.
“Affectively, the image itself becomes shameful as it associates the girl with promiscuity, although this shame can also 'travel' or affectively spread to him for engaging with the image, hence Kaja's complex work to distance himself from implication of relationship with the girl (Kofoed and Ringrose, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kofoed and Ringrose, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Respect vs. 'skets': inscribing girls' bodies with shameEven when a boy takes the photo, the girl is held responsible for being in a position where he could take it, so blame falls on her for creating a morally suspect image.
“Indeed, even if it is the boy who takes the photo, a girl should not be in any position where he can take a picture.Again, responsibility falls to the girl for constructing a morally suspect image.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'Receiving a request for a body image can itself confer value and may amount to a new standard of feminine desirability in current digital peer networks, akin to adult postfeminist media cultures.
“Akin to adult 'postfeminst' media cultures, being asked for an image of one's body carries value, even constitutes a new norm of feminine desirability, within today's digital peer networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'Young people can delete unwanted images or block contacts, but they still must deal with gendered power inequalities around sexual reputation and new performative displays of ideal masculinity and femininity.
“Young people can delete unwanted images or block certain peer contacts but must still deal with gendered power inequalities surrounding sexual reputation and new performative displays of ideal, desirable masculinity and femininity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions: Addressing the gender inequities of teen 'sexting'Images exchanged in sexting have value for both boys and girls within the heterosexualized visual economy of peer networks, and this operates differently by gender.
“Sexting images carry value for boys and girls as part of the heterosexualized visual economy in peer networks, and this works in gender specific ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Blackberry Messenger smartphone technology is extraordinarily popular among UK teenagers because it is cheap and operates 'under the radar', making it very difficult for parents or the provider to monitor.
“BBM smart phone technology has become extraordinarily popular among UK teenagers for its cheapness (at, during the research period, five pounds per month for unlimited messaging) and its operation 'under the radar', being very difficult for parents to oversee or for even the provider to monitor (compared, say, with the efforts Facebook maintains to 'police' what is posted upon it).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Blackberry Messenger is the most popular social networking platform operated by Blackberry smartphones.
“While Facebook and other applications can be accessed on Blackberry, the most popular social networking platform operated by Blackberry smart phones is Blackberry Messenger (widely called 'BBM' by teenagers).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Stranger danger is a rare threat for young people.
“while 'stranger danger' (against which most children have now been warned) remains a rare threat”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In some groups, boys said that showing or sharing images to their peers was necessary as proof if they got a girl to send a nude.
“If boys do get a girl to send a nude we also heard in some groups, that showing or sharing these images to their peers was necessary as proof (Ringrose, Harvey, Gill, & Livingstone, 2013; Berndtsson & Odenbring, 2021; Dodge, 2020; Setty, 2019).”
From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Ringrose, Harvey, Gill, & Livingstone, 2013
In “Getting ‘ratings’: performing masculinity through the visual proof of image exchange” (page unavailable), boys describe showing images to friends as proof that they persuaded a girl to send one. The paper says images could be used this way, but does not establish that showing or sharing them was necessary; one boy says he would tell peers how many images he had without showing them. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe fallout of the non-consensual sharing and showing of nude images was described as worse for girls.
“Moreover, the fallout of the non-consensual sharing and showing of nude images was described as worse for girls, which aligns with previous research on how girls commonly face slut-shaming (Ringrose, Harvey, Gill, & Liv ingstone, 2013; Ringrose & Harvey, 2015; Ricciardelli & Adorjan, 2019) and victim-blaming (Mishna et al., 2021; Lippman & Campbell, 2014) and their images are”
From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Ringrose, Harvey, Gill, & Livingstone, 2013
Sexting by girls is usually censured and blamed.
“Another key example of online gender differences is sexting, a practice of sending sexual images and sometimes sexual texts via cell phone and other electronic devices (Mitchell et al. 2014), which is usually censured and blamed when it is done by girls, while encouraged and reinforced when performed by boys (Ringrose et al. 2013).”
From “It’s just a joke”: gender, sexuality and trivialisation in adolescent online violence such as cyberhate, cyberbullying, and online grooming (2025) · cites this paper as Ringrose et al. 2013
Sexting by boys is encouraged and reinforced.
“Another key example of online gender differences is sexting, a practice of sending sexual images and sometimes sexual texts via cell phone and other electronic devices (Mitchell et al. 2014), which is usually censured and blamed when it is done by girls, while encouraged and reinforced when performed by boys (Ringrose et al. 2013).”
From “It’s just a joke”: gender, sexuality and trivialisation in adolescent online violence such as cyberhate, cyberbullying, and online grooming (2025) · cites this paper as Ringrose et al. 2013
The depicted bodies are ascribed value and gain currency in the heterosexual visual economy of image-sharing practices.
“In this way, the depicted bodies are ascribed value and gain currency in what Ringrose et al. (2013) have described as 'the heterosexual visual economy' of image-sharing practices.”
From Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices: Negotiating boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning and intimacy (2022) · cites this paper as Ringrose et al. (2013)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
This check didn’t finish.
Cites
The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change
McRobbie, Á. (2008) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · Cited by 2,802 · see citing works
Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility
Gill, R. (2007) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367549407075898 · Cited by 2,302 · see citing works
Self-citationLivingstone, S. (2008) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444808089415 · Cited by 1,780 · see citing works
Self-citationYouth, Identity, and Digital Media
Buckingham, D. (2007) · Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) · doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.vii · Cited by 1,257 · see citing works
Why Youth Heart Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life
boyd, D. (2017) · Issue Lab (Candid) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/22hq2 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising
Gill, R. (2008) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353507084950 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-presentation and gender on MySpace
Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
The Male in the Head: Young People, Heterosexuality and Power
Holland, J., Ramazanoğlu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (2004) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 673 · see citing works
The Making of Class and Gender through Visualizing Moral Subject Formation
Skeggs, B. (2005) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038505058381 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Prevalence and Characteristics of Youth Sexting: A National Study
Mitchell, K. J., David Finkelhor, B., Jones, L. M., & Wolak, J. (2011) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1730 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Black British Feminism: A Reader
(1999) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1080/014177899339351 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Body Projects and the Regulation of Normative Masculinity
Gill, R., Henwood, K. L., & McLean, C. (2005) · Body & Society · doi:10.1177/1357034x05049849 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Self-citationReacting to Reality Television
Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203144237 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783311420792 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Self-citationFemale Adolescents, Sexual Empowerment and Desire: A Missing Discourse of Gender Inequity
Tolman, D. L. (2012) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2012) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2011.645023 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationSexting, consent and young people's ethics: Beyond <i>Megan's Story</i>
Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Continuum · doi:10.1080/10304312.2012.665840 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Examining Students’ Intended Image on Facebook: “What Were They Thinking?!”
Peluchette, J. V., & Karl, K. A. (2009) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832320903217606 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Sexting as media production: Rethinking social media and sexuality
Hasinoff, A. A. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812459171 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Technologies of Sexiness: Theorizing Women’s Engagement in the Sexualization of Culture
Evans, A., Riley, S. C. E., & Shankar, A. (2010) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353509351854 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women's talk about heterosexuality
Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466603763276153 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Postfeminist Education?: Girls and the Sexual Politics of Schooling
Ringrose, J. (2012) · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Self-citationRingrose, J. (2011) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230294523_7 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationReacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value
Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2012) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Trends in online social networking: adolescent use of MySpace over time
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809341857 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Theorising Inner-city Masculinities: 'Race', class, gender and education
Archer, L., & Yamashita, H. (2003) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540250303856 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Beyond Criminalisation and Responsibilisation: Sexting, Gender and Young People
Salter, M., Crofts, T., & Lee, M. (2013) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2013.12035963 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
The purity myth: how America's obsession with virginity is hurting young women
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-3522 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Lolita speaks: ‘Sexting,’ teenage girls and the law
Karaian, L. (2012) · Crime Media Culture An International Journal · doi:10.1177/1741659011429868 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Becoming sexual: a critical appraisal of the sexualization of girls
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-0573 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Constructing masculinity on a social networking site
Siibak, A. (2010) · Young · doi:10.1177/110330881001800403 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The Drama! Teen Conflict, Gossip, and Bullying in Networked PublicsPreprint
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2017) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/aknux · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Writing on cellophane: Studying teen women’s sexual desires, inventing methodological release points
FINE, S. I. M. A. M. (2008) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203927175-22 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Harvey, L., Ringrose, J., & Gill, R. (2013) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.3153 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationWolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2011) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Chapter 7 Looking and Desiring Machines: A Feminist Deleuzian Mapping of Bodies and Affects
Ringrose, J., & Coleman, R. (2013) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780748644124-009 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationGetting Real: Challenging the Sexualisation of Girls
Reist, M. T. (2010) · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Postfeminist education? Girls and the sexual politics of schooling
Gwynne, J. (2014) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2014.949497 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Dobson, A. S. (2011) · eSpace (Curtin University) · Cited by 32 · see citing works
‘Sexting’: the exchange of sexual messages online among European youth
Livingstone, S., & Gözig, A. (2012) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.1332/policypress/9781847428837.003.0012 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationStranger Danger and the Online Social Network
Guo, R. M. (2008) · bepress Legal Repository · doi:10.15779/z38j69j · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Technoself-Presentation on Social Networks
Gómez, A. G. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2211-1.ch021 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Arcabascio Catherine, 2010, Richmond Journal of Law and Technology, 1
- Attwood Feona, 2009, Mainstreaming Sex: The Sexualisation of Western Culture
- Guo Richard M., 2008, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 23, 617
- Kofoed Jette, 2012, Discourse, 33, 5
- McClelland Sara I., 2008, The Methodological Dilemma: Critical and Creative Approaches to Qualitative Research, 232
- Ringrose Jessica, 2012, A Qualitative Study of Children, Young People and ‘Sexting’
- Sacco Dena T., 2010, ‘Sexting: Youth Practices and Legal Implications’. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2010–8
- Skeggs Beverley, 2004, Class, Self, Culture
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Post-postfeminism?: new feminist visibilities in postfeminist times
Gill, R. (2016) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2016.1193293 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Self-citationThe affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: A postfeminist sensibility 10 years on
Gill, R. (2017) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367549417733003 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Self-citationKågesten, A., Gibbs, S., Blum, R. W., Moreau, C., Chandra-Mouli, V., Herbert, A., & Amin, A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157805 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting?
Döring, N. M. (2014) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2014-1-9 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Sexting and the Definition Issue
Barrense-Dias, Y., Berchtold, A., Surís, J.-C., & Akre, C. (2017) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.009 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Livingstone, S. (2014) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2014-0113 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationAdolescents and self-taken sexual images: A review of the literature
Cooper, K., Quayle, E., Jonsson, L. S., & Svedin, C. G. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.003 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2017) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the ‘sexualization of culture’ to # MeToo
Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018) · Sexualities · doi:10.1177/1363460718794647 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationAesthetic Labour: Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism
Elias, A. S., Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_1 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationMori, C., Temple, J. R., Browne, D., & Madigan, S. (2019) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1658 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Ringrose, J., & Harvey, L. (2015) · Continuum · doi:10.1080/10304312.2015.1022952 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Self-citationSext education: pedagogies of sex, gender and shame in the schoolyards ofTaggedandExposed
Dobson, A. S., & Ringrose, J. (2015) · Sex Education · doi:10.1080/14681811.2015.1050486 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationBurkett, M. (2015) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media
Salter, M. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815604133 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Renold, E. (2018) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2017.1296352 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Albury, K., & Byron, P. (2016) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305116672887 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Mascheroni, G., Vincent, J., & Jimenez, E. (2015) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2015-1-5 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard
Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (2016) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Brief report: The association between adolescents' characteristics and engagement in sexting
Ouytsel, J. V., Gool, E. V., Ponnet, K. S., & Walrave, M. (2014) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.10.004 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Haslop, C., Ringrose, J., Cambazoglu, I., & Milne, B. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241228811 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationOnly sluts love sexting: youth, sexual norms and non-consensual sharing of digital sexual images
Naezer, M., & van Oosterhout, L. (2021) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2020.1799767 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
When adolescents receive sexual messages on the internet: Explaining experiences of risk and harm
Livingstone, S., & Görzig, A. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.021 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationA Snapshot of Social Media: Camera Phone Practices
Hjorth, L., & Hendry, N. A. (2015) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305115580478 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Cyberbullying across the Lifespan of Education: Issues and Interventions from School to University
Myers, C., & Cowie, H. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16071217 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
New technologies and 21st century children
Graafland, J. H. (2018) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/e071a505-en · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: mediated temporality, duration and affect
Handyside, S., & Ringrose, J. (2017) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2017.1280384 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationKrieger, M. A. (2017) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838016659486 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Gender, Pressure, Coercion and Pleasure: Untangling Motivations for Sexting Between Young People
Lee, M., & Crofts, T. (2015) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azu075 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Albury, K. (2024) · Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) · doi:10.25916/sut.26230736 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Walrave, M., Ponnet, K. S., Ouytsel, J. V., Gool, E. V., Heirman, W., & Verbeek, A. (2015) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.008 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Livingstone, S. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0065 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationIs sexting good for your relationship? It depends …
Drouin, M. A., Coupe, M., & Temple, J. R. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.018 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Girls' and boys' experience with teen sexting in early and late adolescence
Ševčíková, A. (2016) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.06.007 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2017) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.10.006 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Ringrose, J., Regehr, K., & Whitehead, S. (2021) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-021-01236-3 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Routledge Handbook of the Politics of the #MeToo Movement
Chandra, G., & Erlingsdóttir, I. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780367809263 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Wood, M., Barter, C., Stanley, N., Aghtaie, N., & Larkins, C. (2015) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.005 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Ricciardelli, R. (., & Adorjan, M. (2019) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2018.1560245 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Rodenhizer-Stämpfli, K. A., & Edwards, K. M. (2017) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838017717745 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Stonard, K. E. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106211 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Sexting scripts in adolescent relationships: Is sexting becoming the norm?
Symons, K., Ponnet, K. S., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818761869 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Garcia, J. R., Gesselman, A. N., Siliman, S. A., Perry, B. L., Coe, K., & Fisher, H. E. (2016) · Sexual Health · doi:10.1071/sh15240 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Ringrose, J., Regehr, K., & Whitehead, S. (2022) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2021.1947206 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationAdolescent sexting from a social learning perspective
Ouytsel, J. V., Ponnet, K. S., Walrave, M., & d’Haenens, L. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.009 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Ouytsel, J. V., Walrave, M., Marez, L. D., Vanhaelewyn, B., & Ponnet, K. S. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106630 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1185686 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationLet's Talk about Sext: How Adolescents Seek Support and Advice about Their Online Sexual Experiences
Razi, A., Badillo-Urquiola, K., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376400 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Waling, A., & Pym, T. (2019) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2017.1394821 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
A Bad Romance: Sexting Motivations and Teen Dating Violence
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Nappa, M. R., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2018) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260518817037 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Individual differences and developmental trends in sexting motivations
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2019) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00398-4 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media: Towards Theorising Public Lives on Private Platforms
Dobson, A. S., Carah, N., & Robards, B. (2018) · Palgrave studies in communication for social change · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97607-5_1 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Dobson, A. S. (2013) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353513510651 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Gender stereotypes in Facebook profiles: Are women more female online?
Oberst, U. E., Ruiz, V. R., Lusar, A. C., & Carbonell, X. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.085 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Reed, L. A., Boyer, M. P., Meskunas, H. M., Tolman, R. M., & Ward, L. M. (2019) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104696 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Tolman, D. L., Davis, B. R., & Bowman, C. P. (2015) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/0743558415587325 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
It is Time to Teach Safe Sexting
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2020) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.010 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
van Oosten, J. M. F., & Vandenbosch, L. (2017) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.11.006 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Victim-blaming and image-based sexual abuse
Flynn, A., Cama, E. J., Powell, A., & Scott, A. J. (2022) · Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/26338076221135327 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Jørgensen, C. H. R., Weckesser, A., Turner, J., & Wade, A. (2018) · Sex Education · doi:10.1080/14681811.2018.1475283 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Visual gossiping: non-consensual ‘nude’ sharing among young people in Denmark
Johansen, K. B. H., Pedersen, B. M., & Tjørnhøj‐Thomsen, T. (2018) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2018.1534140 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Sexting in adolescents: Prevalence and behaviours
Ojeda, M., Rey, R. D., Walrave, M., & Vandebosch, H. (2020) · Comunicar · doi:10.3916/c64-2020-01 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Girls, mental health and academic achievement: a qualitative systematic review
Stentiford, L., Koutsouris, G., & Allan, A. (2021) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2021.2007052 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Ouytsel, J. V., Ponnet, K. S., & Walrave, M. (2014) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0365 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
A critical review of postfeminist sensibility
Riley, S. C. E., Evans, A., Elliott, S., Rice, C. M., & Marecek, J. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12367 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Searching for Oneself on YouTube: Teenage Peer Socialization and Social Recognition Processes
Balleys, C., Millerand, F., Thoër, C., & Duque, N. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120909474 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Spectacles of intimacy? Mapping the moral landscape of teenage social media
Berriman, L., & Thomson, R. (2014) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2014.992323 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Valleys' girls: re-theorising bodies and agency in a semi-rural post-industrial locale
Ivinson, G., & Renold, E. (2013) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2013.827372 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Sexting Among Adolescents: The Emotional Impact and Influence of the Need for Popularity
Rey, R. D., Ojeda, M., Casas, J. A., Mora-Merchán, J. A., & Elipe, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01828 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Singh, V. K., Chayko, M., Inamdar, R., & Floegel, D. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24335 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Maas, M. K., Bray, B. C., & Noll, J. G. (2019) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-019-00995-3 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., Crossman, A. M., Maas, M. K., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106460 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Longitudinal relationships between sexting and involvement in both bullying and cyberbullying
Ojeda, M., Rey, R. D., & Hunter, S. C. (2019) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.003 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
From risky behaviour to sexy adventures: reconceptualising young people’s online sexual activities
Naezer, M. (2017) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2017.1372632 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Mandau, M. B. H. (2021) · Journal of Children and Media · doi:10.1080/17482798.2020.1848892 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Ringrose, J., Milne, B., Mishna, F., Regehr, K., & Slane, A. (2022) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationGender, Voice and Online Space: Expressions of Feminism on Social Media in Spain
Willem, C., & Tortajada, I. (2021) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v9i2.3851 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Bailey, J., & Steeves, V. (2015) · University of Ottawa Press eBooks · doi:10.26530/oapen_569530 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Sarwatay, D., Raman, U., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2021.601239 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Networked intimacy: Algorithmic friendship and scalable sociality
Chambers, D. A. (2016) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323116682792 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Hartikainen, H., Razi, A., & Wiśniewski, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449116 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Promoting Theory-Based Perspectives in Sexual Double Standard Research
Zaikman, Y., & Marks, M. J. (2016) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0677-z · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The Work of Seduction: Intimacy and Subjectivity in the London ‘Seduction Community’
O’Neill, R. (2015) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.3744 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Bhana, D. (2016) · Sexualities · doi:10.1177/1363460715613298 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Social Media and Young People’s Sexualities: Values, Norms, and Battlegrounds
Ridder, S. D. (2017) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305117738992 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Mandau, M. B. H. (2020) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-019-09626-2 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Adorjan, M., & Ricciardelli, R. (2021) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12319 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Alonso, C., & Romero, E. (2019) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.35.2.339831 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2019) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-019-1449-y · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Digital dating abuse perpetration and impact: The importance of gender
Brown, C., Flood, M., & Hegarty, K. L. (2020) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2020.1858041 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The social life of screenshots: the power of visibility in teen friendship groups
Jaynes, V. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819878806 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Scott, R. H., Smith, C. R., Formby, E., Hadley, A., Hallgarten, L., Hoyle, A., Marston, C., McKee, A., & Tourountsis, D. (2020) · Sex Education · doi:10.1080/14681811.2020.1732337 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Fox, N. J., & Bale, C. (2017) · Sexualities · doi:10.1177/1363460717699769 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
What do kids think about sexting?
Gewirtz‐Meydan, A., Mitchell, K. J., & Rothman, E. F. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.007 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Barrense-Dias, Y., Akre, C., Auderset, D., Leeners, B., Morselli, D., & Surís, J.-C. (2020) · Sexual Health · doi:10.1071/sh19201 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Women’s and Men’s Reactions to Receiving Unsolicited Genital Images from Men
Marcotte, A. S., Gesselman, A. N., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2021) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2020.1779171 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Hunehäll Berndtsson, K., & Odenbring, Y. (2021) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2020.1825217 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Young, H., Turney, C., White, J., Bonell, C. P., Lewis, R., & Fletcher, A. (2017) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdx139 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
What Do Peers Think About Sexting? Adolescents’ Views of the Norms Guiding Sexting Behavior
Burén, J., Gattario, K. H., & Lunde, C. (2021) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/07435584211014837 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Mishna, F., Milne, B., Cook, C., Slane, A., & Ringrose, J. (2021) · Youth & Society · doi:10.1177/0044118x211058226 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ringrose, Jessica
- Venue
- Feminist Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11-14
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-323
- ISSN
- 1464-7001 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2773
- OpenAlex
- W2035588155
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 71.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orcid.org
- Locations
- Feminist Theory (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Goldsmiths Research Online (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Keywords
- teen girls, sexting, sexual double standard, gendered values, postfeminism, slut-shaming, sexual morality, Facebook, blackberry, breast, sexual reputation, heteronormativity, youth sexuality, media culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review