The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics
Abstract
Aims: In 2010 the five Danish regions and the National Institute of Public Health at the University of Southern Denmark conducted a national representative health survey among the adult population in Denmark. This paper describes the study design and the sample and study population as well as the content of the questionnaire. Methods: The survey was based on five regional stratified random samples and one national random sample. The samples were mutually exclusive. A total of 298,550 individuals (16 years or older) were invited to participate. Information was collected using a mixed mode approach (paper and web questionnaires). A questionnaire with a minimum of 52 core questions was used in all six subsamples. Calibrated weights were computed in order to take account of the complex survey design and reduce non-response bias. Results: In all, 177,639 individuals completed the questionnaire (59.5%). The response rate varied from 52.3% in the Capital Region of Denmark sample to 65.5% in the North Denmark Region sample. The response rate was particularly low among young men, unmarried people and among individuals with a different ethnic background than Danish. Conclusions: The survey was a result of extensive national cooperation across sectors, which makes it unique in its field of application, e.g. health surveillance, planning and prioritizing public health initiatives and research. However, the low response rate in some subgroups of the study population can pose problems in generalizing data, and efforts to increase the response rate will be important in the forthcoming surveys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932
Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Comparison
Ritter, P., Lorig, K., Laurent, D., & Matthews, K. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e29 · Cited by 427 · cited 1×
“Despite the methodological concerns associated with it, a mixed-mode approach has many benefits which are largely seen to outweigh its potential challenges [20,22,26].”
Background
Cited by
The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology
Schmidt, M., Pedersen, L., & Sørensen, H. T. (2014) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3 · Cited by 3,441
Schmidt, M., Schmidt, S. A. J., Adelborg, K., Sundbøll, J., Laugesen, K., Ehrenstein, V., & Sørensen, H. T. (2019) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s179083 · Cited by 1,379
Prior, A., Fenger-Grøn, M., Larsen, K. K., Larsen, F. B., Robinson, K. M., Nielsen, M. G., Christensen, K. S., Mercer, S. W., & Vestergaard, M. (2016) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwv324 · Cited by 202
Self-citationAlgren, M. H., Ekholm, O., Nielsen, L., Ersbøll, A. K., Bak, C. K., & Andersen, P. T. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5170-x · Cited by 187
Self-citationCatalog of 199 register-based definitions of chronic conditions
Hvidberg, M. F., Johnsen, S. P., Glümer, C., Petersen, K. D., Olesen, A. V., & Ehlers, L. (2016) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494816641553 · Cited by 63
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, A. I., Ekholm, O., Glümer, C., Andreasen, A. H., Hvidberg, M. F., Kristensen, P. L., Larsen, F. B., Ortiz, B., & Juel, K.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391-397
- ISSN
- 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-1905
- OpenAlex
- W2122257880
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 42.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1403494812451412
- The paper
- Christensen, A. I., Ekholm, O., Glümer, C., Andreasen, A. H., Hvidberg, M. F., Kristensen, P. L., Larsen, F. B., Ortiz, B., & Juel, K. (2012). The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812451412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.