Cited by 53Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

National study of the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among Danish women from 2004 to 2012

Open access
Jeppesen, Charlotte, Maindal, Helle T., Kristensen, Jette K., Ovesen, Per G., Witte, Daniel R.·2017·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Aims: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. We studied the prevalence of GDM from 2004 to 2012 in Danish women aged 15–49 years using registries with records of the diagnosis of GDM at delivery. Methods: We conducted a national register-based study of 12,538 women with a diagnosis of GDM during a pregnancy leading to a live birth in the period 2004–2012. The diagnosis of GDM was taken from the National Patient Registry and combined with the total number of births at the national level from Statistics Denmark. Prevalence estimates were reported as crude and age-standardized using Danish and international data for women aged 15–49 years. Results: A total of 566,083 live births was registered in Denmark from 2004 to 2012. The age-standardized prevalence of GDM increased from 1.7% (1095/63,465) of the total births in 2004 to 2.9% (1721/56,894) of the total births in 2012. During the period 2004–2012, the age-stratified prevalence increased from 1.1 to 1.8% among women aged 15–24 years, from 1.5 to 2.6% among women aged 25–34 years and from 2.9 to 4.7% among women aged 35–49 years. The prevalence was higher among immigrants and their descendants than in native Danish women (4.06 and 2.09% in 2007 vs. 4.51 and 2.72% in 2012, respectively). Conclusions:The prevalence of GDM in Denmark has increased across all age groups. Although the prevalence is low on a global scale, attention should be paid to this development by preventive health services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494817736943

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeppesen, C., Maindal, H. T., Kristensen, J. K., Ovesen, P. G., & Witte, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Jeppesen, Charlotte
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2017-10-23
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
811-817
ISSN
  • 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1905
OpenAlex
W2766402029
Cited by
53
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Danish Diabetes Academy
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (SDCC 3.A Complications)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, prevalence trends, age-standardized prevalence, immigrant women, maternal age, live birth, pregnancy outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Denmark, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Registries, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review