Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coalinga Fibre - A Short, Amphibole-Free Chrysotile Part 1: Evidence for a Lack of Fibrogenic Activity

Ilgren, E., Chatfield, E.·1997·Indoor and Built Environment
DOI 10.1177/1420326x9700600503
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Controversy continues to surround the biological activity of short fibre chryso tile. This is largely due to a lack of studies in which there has been 'pure expo sure' to this material. Most of the exposures studied, whether in humans or animals, have been confounded by the additional presence of long fibre chry sotile and/or amphibole. This report presents the morphological and morpho metric findings of a lifetime inhalation study of F344 rats exposed to three types of chrysotile. The first, from Coalinga, Calif., is comprised of fibres that are almost all less than 5 μm in length and is not contaminated with amphi bole. The other two, the Jeffrey fibre and the UICC/B standard, are both Canadian long fibre preparations with a minor degree of amphibole contami nation. Exposed animals displayed no fibrosis following exposure to Coalinga chrysotile but showed fibrogenic responses with both Canadian fibres.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1420326x9700600503

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Stanton M., 1972, J Natl Cancer Inst, 48, 797
  2. Stanton M., 1981, J Natl Cancer Inst, 67, 965
  3. Pott F., 1994, Ann Occup Hyg, 38, 589
  4. HEI (Health Effects Institute - Asbestos Research), 1991, Asbestos in Public and Commercial Buildings: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Current Knowledge
  5. HEI (Health Effects Institute - Asbestos Research), 1992, Asbestos in Public and Commercial Buildings: Supplementary Analyses of Selected Data Previously Considered by the Literature Review Panel
  6. Corn M., 1994, Ann Occup Hyg, 4, 495
  7. Langer AM, 1978, Health, 4, 173
  8. Case B., 1994, Ann Occup Hyg, 38, 4
  9. Lee R., 1995, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 10, 528
  10. Pigg R., 1994, Ann Occup Hyg, 38, 4
  11. Vorwald AJ, 1951, Occup Med, 3, 1
  12. Timbrell V., 1982, Ann Occup Hyg, 26, 347
  13. Timbrell V., 1983, J Occup Health Soc Austral, 3, 3
  14. Timbrell V., Proc 7th Int Pneumoconiosis Conf
  15. Timbrell V., 1987, Relationships between retained amphibole fibres and fibrosis in human lung specimens
  16. Wagner JC, 1980, IARC Sci Publ, 363
  17. Davis JM, 1988, Exp Pathol, 69, 717
  18. Ilgren E., 1989, The value of experimental animals in analyzing the hazards of exposure to mineral fibres. II. Consideration of natural background incidence of mesotheliomas and non-physiological intraperitoneal technique
  19. Lemaire I., 1985, Am Rev Respir Dis, 131, 144
  20. Lemaire I., 1991, Am J Pathol, 138, 487
  21. Mc Connell E. , Wagner J., Skidmore J., Moore J.: Two inhalation studies: A comparison; in: Biological Effects of Man-Made Mineral Fibres (Report on a WHO/IARC meeting) , Copenhagen, 20-22 April 1982. (Annex 1984 ;38:118-120).
  22. Pinkerton K.: Lung reaction to chronic inhalation of three types of chrysotile asbestos during the lifespan of the Fischer 344 rat; PhD thesis Duke University , 1982.
  23. Crapo J., 1980, Biol Effects Miner Fibers, 1, 273
  24. Pinkerton K., 1981, Am Rev Resp Dis, 123, 21
  25. Pinkerton K., 1981, Am Rev Resp Dis, 121, 251
  26. Pinkerton K., 1984, Am J Pathol, 117, 484
  27. Pinkerton K., 1986, Lab Invest, 55, 688
  28. Solleveld H., 1984, J Natl Cancer Inst, 72, 929
  29. Wagner JC, Berry GB, Hill RJ, Munday DE, Skidmore JW: Animal experiments with MMM(V)F - effects of inhalation and intra-pleural inoculation in rats; in: Biological Effects of Man-Made Mineral Fibres (Report on a WHO/IARC meeting), Copenhagen, 20-22 April 1982. (Annex 1984;42:210-235).
  30. Campbell W., 1980, Chemical and physical characterization of amosite, chrysotile and non-fibrous tremolite for oral ingestion studies by the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences
  31. Timbrell V.: Characteristics of the International Union against Cancer standard reference samples of asbestos; in Shapiro H (ed): Pneumoconiosis Proc Int Conf, Johannesburg , London, Oxford University Press, 1970, p 28.
  32. Gaensler EA, 1991, Asbestos related pleural plaques: Much ado about very little. DRI Asbestos Medicine Seminar
  33. Gibbs A., 1991, Br J Ind Med, 48, 762
  34. Muhle H., 1987, Ann Occup Hyg, 131, 755
  35. Davis J., 1986, Br J Exp Pathol, 67, 113
  36. Mellon Institute, Report No. 29-55 produced for the Union Carbide company 1966 (accessed from Union Carbide on request)
  37. Mellon Institute, Report No. 34-70 produced for the Union Carbide company 1971 (accessed from Union Carbide on request)
  38. Oberdorster G., 1996, IARC Sci Publ, 140, 107
  39. Davis JM, 1980, Exp Pathol, 61, 272
  40. Wagner, J., 1963, Br J Ind Med, 20, 1

Cited by

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Ilgren, E., & Chatfield, E.
Affiliations
  • Bryn Mawr, Pa., USA
  • Toronto, Canada
Venue
Indoor and Built Environment
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1997-09
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
264-276
ISSN
  • 1420-326X
  • 1423-0070
DOI
10.1177/1420326x9700600503
Cited by
27
References
70
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.