User acceptance of inter-organizational electronic medical records
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports the findings of the first stage of an ongoing, longitudinal study into primary care practitioners’ views of an electronic medical records (EMR) system for maternity patients. All doctors and midwives holding maternity care contracts with a large urban hospital in New Zealand were sent a questionnaire soliciting their views on a planned EMR system linking the hospital and the primary care sectors. The questionnaire was based on Davis’ technology acceptance model (TAM) [1]. The results show that while Davis’ two key factors of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness were important to medical professionals, other features of the proposed system and the wider organizational environment also influenced the respondents’ willingness to utilize the proposed system.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709 · see citing works
Davis, F. D. (1993) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · Cited by 4,754 · see citing works
The New Zealand Medical Journal 1887-1987.
Rg, R. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 3,673 · see citing works
Soft Systems Methodology in Action
Gough, T., Checkland, P. B., & Scholes, J. (1991) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2583669 · Cited by 3,414 · see citing works
(1984) · PubMed · Cited by 2,436 · see citing works
Bensaou, M., & Venkatraman, N. V. (1996) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.1996.15 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
The importance of relationship management in establishing successful interorganizational systems
Meier, J. (1995) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/0963-8687(95)80021-h · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The Computer-Based Patient Record Challenges Towards Timeless and Spaceless Medical Practice
Sicotte, C., Denis, J., Lehoux, P., & Champagne, F. (1998) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1022661701101 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
End user computing sophistication and success in small firms
Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. (1996) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.1996.23 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Bowns, I., Rotherham, G., & Paisley, S. (1999) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/146045829900500305 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The “Lost Generation”: IT education for healthcare professionals
Kidd, M. R., & McPhee, W. (1999) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb123778.x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
New Zealand general practice computerisation; attitudes and reported behaviour.
Thakurdas, P., Coster, G., Gurr, E., et al. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Bolton, P. G. M., Usher, H.-L., Mira, M., et al. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Hannah T J. Transporting an electronic patient record sys- tem across international bounderies -the lessons learnt. Medinfo, 1998; 9(1): 18-20.
- Davis F D, Bagozzi R P, Warshaw P R. System acceptabil- ity of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical mod- els. Management Science 1989; 35(8): 983-1003.
- Kidd M, McPhee W. The lost generation -IT education for general practitioners. Medical Journal of Australia 1999; 171: 510- 12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 · Cited by 2,669 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics
Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Lotfnezhad Afshar, H., & Timpka, T. (2018) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1668091 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
- Authors
- Handy, J., Hunter, I., & Whiddett, R.
- Affiliations
- Massey University (NZ)
- ORCID
- Hunter, I.
- Venue
- Health Informatics Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-107
- ISSN
- 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4582
- 1741-2811
- OpenAlex
- W2106750724
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, user acceptance, technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, obstetric care, primary care, interorganizational systems, midwives, physicians
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
