CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model

Open access
Vishwanath, Arun, Scamurra, Susan D.·2007·Health Informatics Journal
DOI 10.1177/1460458207076468
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The study attempts to unify prior research and develop a comprehensive, empirically based conceptual model of the barriers to EHR adoption among community physicians. The model uses concept mapping, which taps the shared expertise of a group and provides reliable estimates with relatively small sample sizes. The methodology includes brainstorming of barrier statements and sorting and rating of issue statements. The model illuminates the larger structure of barriers as well as the finer details of constituent issues. Core issues are standardization and interoperability; also important are technical issues and the cost—benefit of adopting EHRs. However, psychosocial issues, the main focus of diffusion research, seem relatively peripheral. We believe the development of this model is an important first step in creating effective and measurable interventions that enhance the adoption of EHRs in healthcare.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1460458207076468

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Annual HIMSS Conference and Exhibition 2002
  2. Taylor H., 2002, Harris Interactive Health Care News, 2, 1
  3. Burt C. W. H. E., 2005, Advanced Data, 353, 1
  4. Wallis K, 2006, Technology and Health Information Privacy: Consumers and the Adoption of Digital Medical Records Technology
  5. Chismar W.G., In 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–127 of 127

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vishwanath, A., & Scamurra, S. D.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Western New York Health IT -Community Tracking
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2007-06
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
119-134
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
DOI
10.1177/1460458207076468
OpenAlex
W2036991742
Cited by
127
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • New York State Department of Health
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • University of California, Santa Barbara
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
electronic health records, EHR adoption, barriers to adoption, community physicians, conceptual model, concept mapping, standardization, interoperability, cost-benefit analysis, psychosocial barriers, diffusion of innovations
MeSH terms
Attitude to Computers, Diffusion of Innovation, Group Processes, Humans, Models, Theoretical, New York, Cluster Analysis, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review