Cited by 50Medical Coding and Health InformationElectronic Health Records SystemsNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Chart documentation quality and its relationship to the validity of administrative data discharge records

So, Lawrence, Beck, Cynthia A, Brien, Susan, Kennedy, James, Feasby, Thomas E, Ghali, William A, Hude Quan·2010·Health Informatics Journal

Abstract

The validity of administrative data may be vulnerable to how well physicians document medical charts. The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between chart documentation quality and the validity of administrative data. The charts for patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy were re-abstracted and rated for the quality of documentation. Poorly and well-documented charts were compared by patient, physician, and hospital variables, as well as on agreement between the administrative and re-abstracted data. Of the 2061 charts reviewed, 42.6 per cent were rated well documented. The proportion of charts well documented varied from 14.6 to 87.5 per cent across 17 hospitals, but did not vary significantly by patient characteristics. The kappa statistic was generally higher for well-documented charts than for poorly documented charts, but varied across comorbidities. In conclusion, poorly documented hospital charts tend to be translated into invalid administrative data, which reduces the communication of clinical information among healthcare providers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1460458210364784

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
So, L., Beck, C. A., Brien, S., Kennedy, J., Feasby, T. E., Ghali, W. A., & Quan, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Published
2010-06
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
101-113
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
OpenAlex
W2085520376
Cited by
50
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
administrative data validity, hospital discharge data, carotid endarterectomy, interobserver agreement, kappa statistic, comorbidities, clinical information exchange
MeSH terms
Documentation, Humans, Medical Records, Nurses, Patient Discharge, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review