Cited by 131Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMobile Learning in EducationObesity and Health Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Short message service (SMS) text messaging as an intervention medium for weight loss: A literature review

Open access
Shaw, Ryan, Bosworth, Hayden·2012·Health Informatics Journal

Abstract

Nearly 68% of American adults are obese or overweight. Mobile devices such as mobile phones have emerged as a mode of intervention delivery to help people improve their health, particularly in relation to weight loss. This literature review examines the relationship between the use of short message service (SMS) text messaging as an intervention medium and weight loss. Results from this literature review (n = 14) suggest that SMS as an intervention tool for weight loss is still in its infancy. Initial results are promising but continued investigation is needed. We offer several recommendations for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1460458212442422

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. CTIA Wireless Association, 2009, CTIA Semi-Annual Wireless Industry Survey
  2. Atun R, 2006, A Review of the Characteristics and Benefits of SMS in Delivering Healthcare. The Role of Mobile Phones in Increasing Accessibility and Efficiency in Healthcare Report
  3. Bandura A, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
  4. McGraa KL, 2010, The Effects of Persuasive Motivational Text Messaging on Adherence to Diet and Exercise Programs Across Different Personality Traits

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–131 of 131

Metadata

Authors
Shaw, R., & Bosworth, H.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Published
2012-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
235-250
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
OpenAlex
W2107746616
Cited by
131
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31nr012599-01)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (1F31 NR012599, F31 NR012599)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
short message service, text messaging, weight loss, obesity, overweight, mobile health, weight loss interventions, intervention delivery
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Program Evaluation, Weight Loss, Telemedicine, Cell Phone, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review