CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 342Social Media in Health EducationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empowering patients through social media: The benefits and challenges

Househ, Mowafa, Borycki, Elizabeth, Kushniruk, Andre·2014·Health Informatics Journal
DOI 10.1177/1460458213476969
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article explores the range of social media platforms used by patients and examines the benefits and challenges of using these tools from a patient perspective. A literature review was performed to investigate the use of social media technology by patients. The MEDLINE database was searched using the terms “social media” and “patient.” The search was conducted in September 2012 and yielded 765 abstracts. Initially, 63 abstracts were selected. All articles dating from 2004 through 2012 were included. Only 12 articles were found to be relevant for the purposes of the review. The results of this research found that there appears to be an increase in the use of social media by patients across the healthcare spectrum. The research indicates a promising future for the use of social media by patients; however, evidence related to the efficacy and effectiveness of social media is currently limited. Various challenges have also been identified relating to privacy and security concerns, usability, the manipulation of identity, and misinformation. The use of social media technology is an emerging trend for patients who are seeking health information. Conclusions are that such technology holds promise for improving patient engagement and empowerment and community building. Social media has a future in healthcare, especially with regard to patient engagement and empowerment; however, there are several challenges to overcome before the technology can achieve its potential.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1460458213476969

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lau AY, 2011, Yearb Med Inform, 6, 131
  2. Househ M, 2012, Stud Health Technol Inform, 180, 808
  3. Househ M, 2011, Stud Health Technol Inform, 169, 616

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 342

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Househ, M., Borycki, E., & Kushniruk, A.
Affiliations
  • King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2014-02-18
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
50-58
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
DOI
10.1177/1460458213476969
OpenAlex
W2169205257
Cited by
342
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9
FWCI
31.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
social media, patient empowerment, patient engagement, health information seeking, privacy and security, identity manipulation, misinformation, usability, online health communities, patient-physician communication
MeSH terms
Humans, Patient Participation, Patients, Power, Psychological, Consumer Health Information, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review