Cited by 9Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Machine learning model for umbilical cord classification using combination coiling index and texture feature based on 2-D Doppler ultrasound images

Open access

Abstract

The umbilical cord is an organ that circulates oxygen and nutrition from mother to fetus during pregnancy. This study aims to classify the umbilical cord based on ultrasound images. The similarity of shape and coil between each class becomes a challenge. Therefore, it requires feature values that are relevant to the characteristics of these three classes. The condition of imbalanced data sets in this study is also an obstacle that causes the classifier's performance to degrade on minority classes. Therefore, this study proposes a machine learning model capable of properly dealing with imbalanced data sets and recognizing the umbilical cord class.Furthermore, this study proposes a new feature extraction method, namely, the umbilical coiling index (UCI), which directly adopts obstetricians' knowledge. The proposed model consists of five stages: image preprocessing, feature extraction, feature selection, oversampling data using SMOTE, and Classification. Machine learning method observations were carried out comprehensively on five based classifiers: Random Forest, KNN, Decision tree, SVM, Naïve Bayes, and Multiclassifier. The results showed that the Random forest and Multiclassifier methods provide the highest accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure performance in imbalanced data sets.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14604582221084211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 9

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Gupta S, 2006, J Obstet Gynecol India, 56, 315
  2. Kulamani S, 2015, Int J Health Sci (Qassim), 5, 9
  3. Chowdhury SK, 2018, Int J Med Heal Res, 5, 208
  4. Predanic M, 2005, Int J Contin Educ Curr Aware ISSN, 5, 105
  5. Ma M, 2017, J Perinat Med, 46, 1
  6. Cicero G, 2018, J Clin Imaging Sci, 7, 1
  7. Fajrin HR, 2015, Pros SNST, 1, 47
  8. George LE, 2018, Int J Eng Res Sci Technol, 5, 8
  9. 10.1109/TENCON.2016.7372809 · DOI
  10. Wu T, 2018, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2, 365
  11. Pradipta GA, 2020, Int J Intell Eng Syst, 13, 441

Metadata

Authors
Pradipta, G. A., Wardoyo, R., Musdholifah, A., & Sanjaya, I. N. H.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
  • Udayana University (ID)
Corresponding author
Wardoyo, Retantyo
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Published
2022-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
14604582221084211-14604582221084211
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
OpenAlex
W4221078583
Cited by
9
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
umbilical coiling index, texture features, class imbalance, SMOTE oversampling, feature extraction, feature selection, random forest, fetal monitoring
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Umbilical Cord, Ultrasonography, Doppler

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning model for umbilical cord classification using combination coiling index and texture feature based on 2-D Doppler ultrasound images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/14604582221084211
The paper
Pradipta, G. A., Wardoyo, R., Musdholifah, A., & Sanjaya, I. N. H. (2022). Machine learning model for umbilical cord classification using combination coiling index and texture feature based on 2-D Doppler ultrasound images. Health Informatics Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582221084211