Political information repertoires and political participation
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between various forms of media use and political participation. The major argument is that in today’s high-choice media environment, individuals and groups with the highest level of political interest are more likely to develop richer political information repertoires that involve exploiting both digital and traditional ways of searching for political information. Individuals and groups with richer political information repertories can be expected to have higher levels of political knowledge, efficacy, and participation. This article argues further that a clear connection exists between peoples’ informational and participatory repertoires and tests these propositions using a large, heterogeneous sample of the Israeli public during the 2013 election campaign. The analysis supports the claims of this study, with a few intriguing exceptions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals' media diets differ according to the number of media outlets consumed, their diversity, their frequency of use, and how they are combined.
“Las dietas mediáticas de los individuos difieren en función del número de medios de comunicación consumidos, su diversidad, su frecuencia de uso y la forma en la que se combinan (Dubois y Blank, 2018;Wolfsfeld, Yarchi y Samuel-Azran, 2016).”
From Dieta mediática y polarización afectiva en un sistema mediático pluralista polarizado: un estudio longitudinal de España (2026) · cites this paper as Wolfsfeld, Yarchi y Samuel-Azran, 2016
Cites
Practical issues in structural modeling
BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C.-P. (1987) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004 · Cited by 5,804 · see citing works
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x · Cited by 2,229 · see citing works
Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511978777 · Cited by 339 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…given the particular interest of this article in identifying how all this leads to higher levels of political participation, social media are known to be especially effective tools for mobilization (Bennett, 2012; Bennett and Segerberg, 2012; Bimber et al., 2012; Samuel-Azran et al., 2015).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media
Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1428656 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Cuéllar Rivero, R. (2026) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.5477/cis/reis.194.25-44
- Authors
- Wolfsfeld, G., Yarchi, M., & Samuel-Azran, T.
- Affiliations
- Reichman University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Wolfsfeld, Gadi
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2096-2115
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W1974410609
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 22.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- political participation, media use, political interest, political knowledge, political efficacy, digital media, traditional media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review