The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surveying theoretical approaches within digital religion studies
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the development of Digital Religion studies and the theoretical approaches frequently employed within this area. Through considering the ways and theories of mediatization, mediation of meaning, and the religious–social shaping of technology have been engaged and applied in studies of new media technologies, religion, and digital culture we see how Digital Religion studies has grown into a unique area of inquiry informed by both Internet studies and media, religion, and culture studies. Overall, it offers a concise summary of the current state of research inquiry within Digital Religion studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Mediatization of Culture and Society
Hjarvard, S. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203155363 · Cited by 1,057
The social shaping of technology
Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2 · Cited by 917
Hoover, S. M. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203503201 · Cited by 330
The Sociology of Mediation and Communication
Silverstone, R. (2005) · The SAGE Handbook of Sociology · doi:10.4135/9781848608115.n11 · Cited by 235
(2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203805657-18 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.149 · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, H. A.
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-24
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2398787304
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surveying theoretical approaches within digital religion studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1461444816649912
- The paper
- Campbell, H. A. (2017). Surveying theoretical approaches within digital religion studies. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
