The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Mediatization of Culture and Society
Abstract
Mediatization has emerged as a key concept to reconsider old, yet fundamental questions about the role and influence of media in culture and society. In particular the theory of mediatization has proved fruitful for the analysis of how media spread to, become intertwined with, and influence other social institutions and cultural phenomena like politics, play and religion. This book presents a major contribution to the theoretical understanding of the mediatization of culture and society. This is supplemented by in-depth studies of: The mediatization of politics: From party press to opinion industry; The mediatization of religion: From the faith of the church to the enchantment of the media; The mediatization of play: From bricks to bytes; The mediatization of habitus: The social character of a new individualism. Mediatization represents a new social condition in which the media have emerged as an important institution in society at the same time as they have become integrated into the very fabric of social and cultural life. Making use of a broad conception of the media as technologies, institutions and aesthetic forms, Stig Hjarvard considers how characteristics of both old and new media come to influence human interaction, social institutions and cultural imaginations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Media logics, in short, are signified by simplification, polarization, emotionalization, i.e. certain practices typical for the short format of mainstream media and which affects the way other institutions organize and perceive themselves (Couldry & Hepp, 2017;Hepp, 2020;Hjarvard, 2013).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Hjarvard, 2013
In the citing paper
“Hjarvard's (2013) surveys of religion in Denmark demonstrate that various media have become important sources of knowledge about religion”
From Mediatization and the changing authority of religion (2016) · cites this paper as Hjarvard, 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mediatization and the changing authority of religion
Hjarvard, S. (2016) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443715615412 · Cited by 147
Self-citationTeaching “Against” Social Media: Confronting Problems of Profit in the Curriculum
Krutka, D. G., Manca, S., Galvin, S. M., Greenhow, C., Koehler, M. J., & Askari, E. (2019) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811912101410 · Cited by 97
Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction
Räisä, T., & Stocchetti, M. (2024) · Journal of Digital Social Research · doi:10.33621/jdsr.v6i3.33235 · Cited by 12
Ainiala, T., Räisä, T., & Sjöblom, P. (2020) · Puhe ja kieli · doi:10.23997/pk.95494 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Hjarvard, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Hjarvard, Stig
- ORCID
- Hjarvard, Stig
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-03-12
- OpenAlex
- W615647031
- Cited by
- 1,057
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 17
- FWCI
- 42.89
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Mediatization and Communication for Social Change
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural, Social, and Media Studies
- Keywords
- mediatization, media and society, media and culture, mediatization of politics, party newspapers, mediatization of religion, media and religion, habitus, individualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review