The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework
Abstract
Through an analysis of relevant literature and open-ended survey responses from 2501 Singaporeans, this article proposes a conceptual framework to understand how individuals authenticate the information they encounter on social media. In broad strokes, we find that individuals rely on both their own judgment of the source and the message, and when this does not adequately provide a definitive answer, they turn to external resources to authenticate news items.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Communication and Persuasion · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 · Cited by 3,202
The Moral Foundations of Trust
Uslaner, E. M. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614934 · Cited by 2,836
Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 · Cited by 2,172
Self-citationThe Moral Foundations of Trust
Uslaner, E. M. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.824504 · Cited by 2,042
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015
Newman, N., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2619576 · Cited by 1,890
Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x · Cited by 1,394
News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience
Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002 · Cited by 1,220
Cited by
The facts of fake news: A research review
Tandoc, E. C. (2019) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12724 · Cited by 326
Self-citationKim, H. K., Ahn, J., Atkinson, L., & Kahlor, L. A. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020959670 · Cited by 313
Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095 · Cited by 227
De Paor, S., & Heravi, B. (2020) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102218 · Cited by 191
Healthcare professionals’ acts of correcting health misinformation on social media
Bautista, J. R., Zhang, Y., & Gwizdka, J. (2021) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104375 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Tandoc, E. C., Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D., & Zheng Wei, L.
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-09-21
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2745-2763
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2756862998
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 46.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1461444817731756
- The paper
- Tandoc, E. C., Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D., & Zheng Wei, L. (2018). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.