Trusted strangers: Carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy
Abstract
On-demand labor platforms offer many in-person services, from ride-hailing to childcare. However, scholars have focused on ride-hailing, leading to a model of “Uberization” that entails the informalization of work. We argue that online carework platforms that match nannies and babysitters to families show the limits of this narrative. Based on a discourse analysis of carework platforms and interviews with workers using them, we illustrate that these platforms seek to formalize employment relationships through technologies that increase visibility. We argue that carework platforms are “cultural entrepreneurs” that create and maintain cultural distinctions between populations of workers, and institutionalize those distinctions into platform features. Ultimately, the visibility created by platforms does not realize the formalization of employment relationships, but does serve the interests of platform companies and clients and exacerbate existing inequalities for workers. As one of the first analyses of carework platforms, this study also points to gendered bias in the scholarly literature about the on-demand economy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400101 · Cited by 2,998 · see citing works
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Platform companies often frame their value by appealing to the democratizing potential of the Internet to connect people to entrepreneurial work (Gillespie, 2010).”
BackgroundTerranova, T. (2000) · Social Text · doi:10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33 · Cited by 1,749 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…“networked” labor has focused on the production of media and other creative products, through both waged and unwaged labor (Fish and Srinivasan, 2012; Terranova, 2000; Zhao, 2016), as well as low-status clerical work in the form of crowdsourced “cognitive piecework” (Gray et al., 2016; Irani,…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732 · see citing works
The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework
C. Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320967740 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Chan, N. K. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221133779 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Glaser, A. L. (2021) · Anthropology of Work Review · doi:10.1111/awr.12215 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Filipetto, S., Micha, A., Pereyra, F., Poggi, C., & Trombetta, M. (2024) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12283 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The Digital Boss: Algorithms, Housekeeping Apps, and the Digitalization of Domestic Work in Colombia
Mantilla-León, L. C., Jaimes Rodríguez, I., & Maldonado Castañeda, O. J. (2026) · Critical Sociology · doi:10.1177/08969205241304790 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ticona, J., & Mateescu, A.
- Affiliations
- Data & Society Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ticona, Julia
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-05-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4384-4404
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2803753421
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 39.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (74434)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- cultural entrepreneurship, on-demand economy, informalization of work, Uberization, formalization of employment, platform work, employment relationship, gender bias in research, platform companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review