Cited by 39Social Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and PoliticsMisinformation and Its Impacts

Analyzing change in network polarization

Kearney, Michael Wayne·2019·New Media & Society

Abstract

The growing influence of social media in an era of media fragmentation has amplified concerns of political polarization. Yet relatively few studies have analyzed polarization in user networks over time. This study therefore examines change in network polarization on Twitter during a highly contested general election. Using Twitter’s REST API, user networks of 3000 randomly selected followers of well-known partisan and entertainment-oriented accounts were recorded 17 times in the 7 months leading up to the 2016 general election. Results suggest that partisan users form highly partisan networks on Twitter, while moderate, or less engaged, users continue to mostly avoid politics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444818822813

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 79 · Cited by 39

Authors
Kearney, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Kearney, Michael Wayne
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2019-01-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1380-1402
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W2909508774
Cited by
39
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
12.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
political polarization, Twitter, social media, media fragmentation, user engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review