Cited by 316China's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceCOVID-19 Digital Contact TracingPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

China’s social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval

Open access
Kostka, Genia·2019·New Media & Society

Abstract

A variety of commercial and local government social credit systems (SCSs) are now being implemented in China in order to steer the behavior of Chinese individuals, businesses, social organizations, and government agencies. Previous research finds that these SCSs are employed by the Chinese state as “surveillance infrastructure” and for social management. This article focuses on a different angle: the public’s opinion of SCSs. Based on a cross-regional survey, the study finds a surprisingly high degree of approval of SCSs across respondent groups. Interestingly, more socially advantaged citizens (wealthier, better-educated, and urban residents) show the strongest approval of SCSs, along with older people. While one might expect such knowledgeable citizens to be most concerned about the privacy implications of SCS, they instead appear to embrace SCSs because they interpret it through frames of benefit-generation and promoting honest dealings in society and the economy instead of privacy-violation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444819826402

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although China aspires to a nationwide social credit system, there is currently only a patchwork of local, regional, and private social credit systems, which enjoy unexpected levels of public approval.

    “Although China aspires to a nationwide system, there is currently only a patchwork of local, regional, and private social credit systems, which enjoy unexpected levels of public approval (99).”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [99]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ahmed S (2018) Personal risk and algorithmic opacity: an investigation of user-identified con- cerns in the construction of the social credit system. In: Proceedings of workshop on digi- tal transformation in China-recent trends and impacts, (working paper presented at Freie Universität Berlin), Berlin, 19 January 2018.
  2. Knight A (2018) Vortrag: in Laotianye we trust: social credit, morality and governance in China's exemplary society. Master's Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.
  3. Lv A and Luo T (2018) Authoritarian practices in the digital age asymmetrical power between internet giants and users in China. International Journal of Communication 12: 3877-3895.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kostka, G.
Affiliations
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Kostka, Genia
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2019-02-13
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
1565-1593
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W3124636197
Cited by
316
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 1
FWCI
181.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
New Media & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
social credit system, public opinion, public approval, surveillance infrastructure, social management, privacy concerns, social inequality, socioeconomic status, urban-rural differences, age differences, framing, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review