The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Context collapse and anonymity among queer Reddit users
Abstract
This article maps out how people in queer communities on Reddit navigate context collapse. Drawing upon data from interviews with queer Reddit users and insights from other studies of context collapse in digital media, we argue that context collapse also occurs in anonymity-based social media. The interviews reveal queer Reddit users’ practices of context differentiation, occurring at four levels: somatic, system, inter-platform and intra-platform. We use these levels to map out how lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer or questioning (LGBTQ) people express their identities and find community on Reddit while seeking to minimize the risks imposed by multiple impending context collapses. Because living an authentic queer life can make subjects vulnerable, we find that despite Reddit’s anonymity, sophisticated practices of context differentiation are developed and maintained. We argue that context collapse in an era of big data and social media platforms operates beyond the control of any one user, which causes problems, particularly for queer people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We chose to focus on Reddit due to its prominency as an online platform and due to the anonymity it provides, with users mostly choosing pseudonyms instead of their real names compared to social media platforms like Facebook [54] [55].”
From "I tell him everything that I do": An investigation of privacy and safety implications of AI companion usage (2025) · cites this paper as [55]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life
Nissenbaum, H. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9780804772891 · Cited by 2,129 · cited 1×
“Developing a similar argument, Helen Nissenbaum (2009) contends that privacy is a fulfilment of ‘information norms’, emphasizing how the expectations of what will be disclosed to whom is context dependent.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1177/1363460716665783 · DOI
- 10.1177/2056305116672887 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444817714790 · DOI
- 10.1086/448884 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444814521595 · DOI
- Boyd DM, 2008, Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics
- Boyd DM, 2007, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 38, 16
- 10.1080/00918369.2012.699851 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444814542311 · DOI
- Campbell JE, 2004, Getting It on Online. Cyberspace, Gay Male Sexuality, and Embodied Identity
- 10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/089124195024003002 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444818756290 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458 · DOI
- 10.1080/01587919.2017.1322453 · DOI
- 10.1177/2056305116672485 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781452243818.n7 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822383901-007 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444814549930 · DOI
- 10.1177/1354856517700384 · DOI
- 10.1080/00918360903543154 · DOI
- 10.1145/2675133.2675175 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1367877912452486 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444810365313 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444814543995 · DOI · Paper page
- Meyrowitz J, 1985, No Sense of Place
- 10.4324/9781315208589-18 · DOI
- Mowlabocus S, 2010, Gaydar Culture: Gay Men, Technology and Embodiment in the Digital Age
- 10.1111/cccr.12013 · DOI
- 10.1086/493756 · DOI
- 10.1177/1363460716678563 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_55-1 · DOI
- Van der Nagel E, 2013, Journal of Media Arts Culture, 10, 1
- Van der Nagel E, 2015, First Monday, 20
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08838151.2012.732140 · DOI
- 10.1080/00335630209384388 · DOI
- 10.1386/eme.8.2.99_1 · DOI
- Workman H, 2014, Formation of Safe Spaces in Gendered Online Communities: Reddit and ‘The Front Page of the Internet’
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Henriksen, A., Asadi, R., Kulyk, O., Gerdes, A., & Mayer, P. (2025) · 2025 European Symposium on Usable Security (EuroUSEC) · doi:10.1109/eurousec69254.2025.00011 · Cited by 8
Trust and Friction: Negotiating How Information Flows through Decentralized Social Media
Hwang, S., Nanayakkara, P., & Shvartzshnaider, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757516 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Triggs, A. H., Møller, K., & Neumayer, C.
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-11-27
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-21
- ISSN
- 1461-4448
- 1461-7315
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review