The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping #MeToo: A synthesis review of digital feminist research across social media platforms
Open accessAbstract
A tweet by Hollywood actress Alyssa Milano using Tarana Burke’s phrase “me too” sparked a global movement. Despite the media attention #MeToo has garnered, little is known about how scholars have studied the movement. Through a synthesis review covering sources from 2006 to 2019, we learned that in this time period only 22 studies examined participation on social media such as Twitter and Facebook. We conclude that more research needs to be conducted, particularly to fill a gap in qualitative studies that directly engage individuals, to learn about their experiences with the movement. While #MeToo is a global movement, the omission of any reference to geography or a lack of geographic diversity suggests a narrow focus on scholarship based in the Global North. There is a need for more cross-cultural analysis to gain a better understanding of the movement as it evolves over time and moves into different spaces.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quan-Haase et al. identify insufficiencies in qualitative exploration of participants' experience in social media feminist movements and examination of societies other than the Global North.
“Quan-Haase et al., (2021) identify insufficiencies in 1) qualitative exploration of participants' experience in the social media feminist movement; and 2) examination of societies other than the Global North.”
From #girls help girls#: feminist discussions and affective heterotopia in patriarchal China (2024) · cites this paper as Quan-Haase et al., (2021)
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness
Frankenburg, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203973431 · Cited by 3,308
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1093/bjc/azv113 · DOI
- Buchel O, 2017, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, 285
- 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217 · DOI · Paper page
- Carter C, 1998, News, Gender and Power, 219
- Collins PH, 2016, Intersectionality
- Crenshaw K, 1989, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139
- Creswell T, 2004, Place
- 10.9783/9780812204001 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/11967.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444816688457 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077801218768709 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_12 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152 · DOI
- Hansson K, Sveningsson M, Sandgren M, et al. (2019) “We passed the trust on”: Strategies for security in #MeToo activism in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the 17th European conference on computer-supported cooperative work, exploratory papers. EUSSET, p. 19. Available at: https://dl.eusset.eu/bitstream/20.500.12015/3247/1/ecscw2019_ep14.pdf
- Horeck T, 2004, Public Rape
- Kitzinger J, 2009, Rape: Challenging Contemporary Thinking, 74
- 10.1080/14680777.2014.975449 · DOI
- 10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.2.0026 · DOI
- Loney-Howes R, 2020, Online Anti-Rape Activism
- McCay-Peet L, 2017, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, 13
- 10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_3 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444818820069 · DOI
- 10.1177/1350506818765318 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · DOI · Paper page
- Moher D, 2009, PLoS Medicine, 6
- Moorti S, 2002, Color of Rape: Gender and Race in Television’s Public Spheres, 10.1353/book4470 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697 · DOI
- Robinson L, 2020, First Monday
- 10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_8 · DOI
- 10.1177/1741659013493918 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-98669-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/14680777.2020.1718176. · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
#girls help girls#: feminist discussions and affective heterotopia in patriarchal China
Yang, X., & Hu, N. (2024) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2023.2229967 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Quan-Haase, A., Mendes, K., Ho, D., Lake, O., Nau, C., & Pieber, D.
- Affiliations
- Western University, Canada
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Western University (CA)
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-01-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1700-1720
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W3120699922
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 17.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (R3603A20)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- #MeToo, feminist research, social media participation, Twitter, Facebook, hashtag activism, cross-cultural analysis, Global North bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review