Cited by 94Gender, Feminism, and MediaSocial Media and PoliticsMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping #MeToo: A synthesis review of digital feminist research across social media platforms

Open access
Quan-Haase, Anabel, Mendes, Kaitlynn, Ho, Dennis, Lake, Olivia, Nau, Charlotte, Pieber, Darryl·2021·New Media & Society

Abstract

A tweet by Hollywood actress Alyssa Milano using Tarana Burke’s phrase “me too” sparked a global movement. Despite the media attention #MeToo has garnered, little is known about how scholars have studied the movement. Through a synthesis review covering sources from 2006 to 2019, we learned that in this time period only 22 studies examined participation on social media such as Twitter and Facebook. We conclude that more research needs to be conducted, particularly to fill a gap in qualitative studies that directly engage individuals, to learn about their experiences with the movement. While #MeToo is a global movement, the omission of any reference to geography or a lack of geographic diversity suggests a narrow focus on scholarship based in the Global North. There is a need for more cross-cultural analysis to gain a better understanding of the movement as it evolves over time and moves into different spaces.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444820984457

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quan-Haase et al. identify insufficiencies in qualitative exploration of participants' experience in social media feminist movements and examination of societies other than the Global North.

    “Quan-Haase et al., (2021) identify insufficiencies in 1) qualitative exploration of participants' experience in the social media feminist movement; and 2) examination of societies other than the Global North.”

    From #girls help girls#: feminist discussions and affective heterotopia in patriarchal China (2024) · cites this paper as Quan-Haase et al., (2021)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1093/bjc/azv113 · DOI
  2. Buchel O, 2017, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, 285
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Carter C, 1998, News, Gender and Power, 219
  5. Collins PH, 2016, Intersectionality
  6. Crenshaw K, 1989, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139
  7. Creswell T, 2004, Place
  8. 10.9783/9780812204001 · DOI
  9. 10.7551/mitpress/11967.001.0001 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1461444816688457 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/1077801218768709 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_12 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152 · DOI
  15. Hansson K, Sveningsson M, Sandgren M, et al. (2019) “We passed the trust on”: Strategies for security in #MeToo activism in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the 17th European conference on computer-supported cooperative work, exploratory papers. EUSSET, p. 19. Available at: https://dl.eusset.eu/bitstream/20.500.12015/3247/1/ecscw2019_ep14.pdf
  16. Horeck T, 2004, Public Rape
  17. Kitzinger J, 2009, Rape: Challenging Contemporary Thinking, 74
  18. 10.1080/14680777.2014.975449 · DOI
  19. 10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.2.0026 · DOI
  20. Loney-Howes R, 2020, Online Anti-Rape Activism
  21. McCay-Peet L, 2017, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, 13
  22. 10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_3 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/1461444818820069 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/1350506818765318 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Moher D, 2009, PLoS Medicine, 6
  28. Moorti S, 2002, Color of Rape: Gender and Race in Television’s Public Spheres, 10.1353/book4470 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697 · DOI
  30. Robinson L, 2020, First Monday
  31. 10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_8 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/1741659013493918 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/978-3-319-98669-2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1080/14680777.2020.1718176. · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Quan-Haase, A., Mendes, K., Ho, D., Lake, O., Nau, C., & Pieber, D.
Affiliations
  • Western University, Canada
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Western University (CA)
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2021-01-09
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1700-1720
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W3120699922
Cited by
94
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
FWCI
17.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (R3603A20)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
#MeToo, feminist research, social media participation, Twitter, Facebook, hashtag activism, cross-cultural analysis, Global North bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review