The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“I’m not this Person”: Racism, content moderators, and protecting and denying voice online
Abstract
Much scholarship across the humanities and social sciences seek to shed light on the intersection of far-right politics and social media platforms. Yet, scholars tend to focus on racist actors and the ideological underpinnings of platform policies while the contingencies that shape the experiences of content reviewers who make decisions about racist content remain underexamined. This article fills this gap by exploring such contingencies from a linguistic anthropological perspective. Drawing on Facebook moderators’ stories, I illustrate the factors adjacent to, and beyond, ideology that animate the adjudication of racist hate speech.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This suggests that intrusive thoughts and hypervigilance may also be associated with working with hate speech.”
From The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as Jereza, 2022
In the citing paper
“However, there is some evidence that suggests the harmful impacts of moderation are not necessarily restricted to those viewing overtly disturbing material such as CSAM.”
From The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as Jereza, 2022
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Racism in Color-Blind, “Post-Racial” America
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2015) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764215586826 · Cited by 549
Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media
ROBERTS, S. T. (2019) · Yale University Press · doi:10.2307/j.ctvhrcz0v · Cited by 339 · cited 6×
“Many suffer from emotional and psychological distress due to viewing graphic content without adequate mental health support combined with productivity pressures (Chen, 2014; Breslow, 2018; Jereza, 2021; Newton, 2019; Roberts, 2016, 2018, 2019).”
Influential
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822395324 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822394716 · DOI · Paper page
- Bonilla-Silva E, 2010, Racism Without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States
- 10.1080/23268743.2018.1472034 · DOI
- Carmi E, 2019, International Journal of Communication, 13, 440
- Cho S, 2009, Iowa Law Review, 94, 1589
- 10.1075/pbns.164.07du · DOI
- Gillespie T, 2017, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, 254
- Gillespie T, 2018, The Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media
- 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/1469-8676.13106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/2056305119856700 · DOI
- 10.14318/hau7.1.030 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293130 · DOI
- Miller-Idriss C, 2020, Hate in the Homeland: The New Global Far Right
- Mondon A, 2020, Reactionary Democracy: How Racism and the Populist Far Right Became Mainstream
- Roberts ST, 2016, The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class and Culture Online, 147
- 10.5210/fm.v23i3.8283 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0047404517000562 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1527476420982232 · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-4446.12054 · DOI
- Stern AM, 2019, Proud Boys and the White Ethnostate: How the Alt-right Is Warping the American Imagination
- 10.1215/9780822390404 · DOI
- 10.32855/fcapital.202101.007 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study
Spence, R., Bifulco, A., Bradbury, P., Martellozzo, E., & DeMarco, J. (2023) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-4-8 · Cited by 48
Measuring the Mental Health of Content Reviewers, a Systematic Review
Gonzalez, A., & Matias, J. N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.00244 · Cited by 1
“Further research is necessary to determine the prevalence of these harms among content reviewers, whether they vary on the basis of the content that they review, and what can be done to manage these harms [92, 168].”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Jereza, R.
- Affiliations
- New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jereza, Rae
- ORCID
- Jereza, Rae
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-09-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4454-4470
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W4296709978
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1928627)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- content moderation, racism, hate speech, far right, social networking sites, platform policies, linguistic anthropology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
