Cited by 10Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyEducation Discipline and Inequality

Punishment is purple: The political economy of prison building

Open access
Eason, John M, Campbell, Mary E, Ghasemi, Benjamin, Huey, Eileen·2024·Punishment & Society

Abstract

The United States is unique among rich countries in the world in its level of contemporary mass incarceration, a massive social change that has reshaped the nature of inequality and social mobility. We have more than tripled the number of prison facilities since 1970. Despite employing nearly 450,000 corrections officers, occupying a land mass of roughly 600 square miles, and costing conservatively $30 billion to build, this massive public works project has transformed the American countryside virtually unnoticed, with nearly 70% of U.S. facilities being built in rural communities. We suggest that mass incarceration—more than 2 million locked up annually—was not possible without the transformation of the American countryside through the prison boom—the increase from roughly 500 to nearly 1700 carceral facilities. There is a longstanding belief that the rural town leaders and politicians responsible for the prison boom are almost exclusively white, male, Republicans. We explore the political, social, and economic influences of prison building across states, regions, and cities/towns. Using multilevel modeling, we find that racial and economic disadvantage predicts prison building in towns, and party affiliation of state legislatures predicts prison building across different periods of the prison boom. While others find a link between Republican Party strength in state legislatures and mass incarceration, our findings suggest that prison building, like other types of punishment…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14624745231218521

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The political economy of prison building is associated with racial and economic disadvantage but is broadly bipartisan, reflecting the expansion of carceral state politics across the political spectrum.

    “John Eason and colleagues (2024) find that the political economy of prison building is associated with racial and economic disadvantage but is broadly bipartisan, reflecting the expansion of carceral state politics across the political spectrum.”
  • There is widespread evidence that racialized political frames of crime and punishment are entrenched today.

    “there is widespread evidence that these political frames are entrenched today.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eason, J. M., Campbell, M. E., Ghasemi, B., & Huey, E.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Eason, John M
Venue
Punishment & Society
Published
2024-01-02
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
967-983
ISSN
  • 1462-4745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3095
OpenAlex
W4390541773
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Punishment & Society (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
prison buildings, mass incarceration, political economy of punishment, rural communities, state legislatures, political affiliation, racial disadvantage, economic disadvantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review