The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychology of News Decisions: Factors behind Journalists’ Professional Behavior
Abstract
This article is about causal explanations for the way journalists report the news. In its first part, the article reviews traditional and current models or theories of journalists’ news decisions, concentrating on news factors, institutional objectives, the manipulative power of public relations by news sources and the subjective beliefs of journalists. It comes to the conclusion that most of these approaches do not explain the underlying processes leading to news judgements. Starting from these shortcomings and from the assumption that most of journalists’ work is about perceptions, conclusions and judgements, it then attempts to apply psychological theories to news decision-making. The author holds that two general needs or functions involving specific psychological processes can explain news decisions: a need for social validation of perceptions and a need to preserve one’s existing predispositions. Empirical data from several surveys and studies among journalists are used to demonstrate the appropriateness of this approach to journalists’ behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
Patterson, T. E. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,293
The Psychology of Social Norms
Lemmon, M. L., & Sherif, M. (1938) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416439 · Cited by 1,272
Vallone, R. P., Ross, L. D., & Lepper, M. R. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.49.3.577 · Cited by 1,165
Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis
Breed, W. (1955) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2573002 · Cited by 945
Selective Exposure To Communication
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203056721 · Cited by 780
Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective.
Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996) · Cited by 731
Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide.
Snow, R. P., & Graber, D. A. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070921 · Cited by 716
The sociology of news production
Schudson, M. (1989) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/016344389011003002 · Cited by 523
Cited by
Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
(2016) · Studies in Information · doi:10.1108/s2055-53772016 · Cited by 1,540
Metadata
- Authors
- Donsbach, W.
- Venue
- Journalism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-157
- ISSN
- 1464-8849 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3001
- OpenAlex
- W2066799640
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 19.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychology of News Decisions: Factors behind Journalists’ Professional Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/146488490452002
- The paper
- Donsbach, W. (2004). Psychology of News Decisions: Factors behind Journalists’ Professional Behavior. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490452002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.