The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis
Abstract
It will be noted that, in general, the groups with practically no deviation are those that rank relatively high on the autonomy scale and the groups with some deviation are those that rank relatively low on the autonomy scale. By the H-test of significance of differences,7 the indicated differences are found to be significant at the .05 level of significance, and at that level the null hypothesis of a common universe can be rejected. The rejection of the null hypothesis permits the adoption of a major corollary to the original hypothesis: The eJfectiveness of a group's control over the members of the group increases monotonically with increase in the autonomy of the group. Since the corollary has been both deduced from and substantiated independently of the manipulatorypotential conclusions outlined above, it offers support for the validity of those conclusions. At the same time, it must be remembered that the data utilized are crude, and further substantiation in additional studies is imperative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure
Boin, A., 't Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490880 · Cited by 932
Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change
Antilla, L. (2005) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003 · Cited by 511
Psychology of News Decisions: Factors behind Journalists’ Professional Behavior
Donsbach, W. (2004) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/146488490452002 · Cited by 313
Nechushtai, E., & Lewis, S. C. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.043 · Cited by 237
Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP
Hershcovich, D., Frank, S., Lent, H., de Lhoneux, M., Abdou, M., Brandl, S., Bugliarello, E., Cabello Piqueras, L., Chalkidis, I., Cui, R., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.482 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Breed, W.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1955-05-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 326-335
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2058348392
- Cited by
- 945
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2573002
- The paper
- Breed, W. (1955). Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.