Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 945

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis

Breed, W.·1955·Social Forces

Abstract

It will be noted that, in general, the groups with practically no deviation are those that rank relatively high on the autonomy scale and the groups with some deviation are those that rank relatively low on the autonomy scale. By the H-test of significance of differences,7 the indicated differences are found to be significant at the .05 level of significance, and at that level the null hypothesis of a common universe can be rejected. The rejection of the null hypothesis permits the adoption of a major corollary to the original hypothesis: The eJfectiveness of a group's control over the members of the group increases monotonically with increase in the autonomy of the group. Since the corollary has been both deduced from and substantiated independently of the manipulatorypotential conclusions outlined above, it offers support for the validity of those conclusions. At the same time, it must be remembered that the data utilized are crude, and further substantiation in additional studies is imperative.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2573002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 945

Metadata

Authors
Breed, W.
Venue
Social Forces
Published
1955-05-01
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
326-335
ISSN
  • 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7605
OpenAlex
W2058348392
Cited by
945
References
0
FWCI
39.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2573002
The paper
Breed, W. (1955). Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.