The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration
Open accessAbstract
This article summarizes and extends the main lines of theorizing on public opinion on European integration. We test theories of economic calculus and communal identity in a multi-level analysis of Eurobarometer data. Both economic calculus and communal identity are influential, but the latter is stronger than the former. We theorize how the political consequences of identity are contested and shaped - that is to say, politically cued - in national contexts. The more national elites are divided, the more citizens are cued to oppose European integration, and this effect is particularly pronounced among citizens who see themselves as exclusively national. A model that synthesizes economic, identity, and cue theory explains around one-quarter of variation at the individual level and the bulk of variation at the national and party levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage
Porter, P. K., Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2003) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/30040740 · Cited by 7,510
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,169
Has Globalization Gone Too Far?
Rodrik, D. (1998) · Challenge · doi:10.1080/05775132.1998.11472025 · Cited by 2,464
Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets
Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226356495.001.0001 · Cited by 2,081
Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?
Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/001041402236310 · Cited by 1,826
Self-citationHas Globalization Gone Too Far?
Rodrik, D. (1997) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165897 · Cited by 1,725
Modeling Multilevel Data Structures
Steenbergen, M. R., & Jones, B. S. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088424 · Cited by 1,503
On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?
Druckman, J. N. (2001) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00100 · Cited by 1,306
Cited by
The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent
Hobolt, S. B. (2016) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785 · Cited by 1,156
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2018) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281 · Cited by 513
Wojcieszak, M., Azrout, R., & de Vreese, C. (2018) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfx040 · Cited by 37
Shaping Public Opinion about Regional Integration: The Rhetoric of Justification and Party Cues
Vössing, K. (2021) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321720905130 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Hooghe, L., & Marks, G.
- Venue
- European Union Politics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 419-443
- ISSN
- 1465-1165 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2757
- OpenAlex
- W2062662966
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 96.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1465116505057816
- The paper
- Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration. European Union Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116505057816
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
