Cited by 225Participatory Visual Research MethodsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative research in health

Timelining: visualizing experience

Open access
Sheridan, Joanna, Chamberlain, Kerry, Dupuis, Ann·2011·Qualitative Research

Abstract

This article discusses the uses and benefits of an innovative method of graphic elicitation; timelining. The method was developed in the context of a narrative-based research project on fatness and weight loss. Participants’ weight over time was plotted on a graph, informed and elaborated by a variety of material objects such as photographs, diaries, and medical records. The timeline provided a focus for participants and prompted their stories of weight loss experiences over time. While initially intended as a simple heuristic tool for eliciting talk, over the course of the research the process of timelining became a central feature of the project. Timelining is a subtle and malleable research method. While keeping time in view, timelining documents, records, extends and deepens understandings of participants’ past experiences. It encourages the construction of rich temporal narratives. It also provides opportunity for a deeper researcher-participant relationship to develop. This form of graphic elicitation has particular value for narrative forms of research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1468794111413235

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The timeline was used to explore together with the participant the meaning and dimensions of their memories and stories, which revealed nuance and complexities of migration decisions.

    “Second, rather than leaving the interpretation of the autobiographical narrative to the researcher, the timeline was used to explore together with the participant the meaning and dimensions of their memories and stories (Sheridan, Chamberlain and Dupuis, 2011), which revealed nuance and complexities of migration decisions (Gauntlett, 2007, in Bagnoli, 2009).”

    From Back in Time? A Temporal Autobiographical Approach to Afghan Return Migration (2025) · cites this paper as Sheridan, Chamberlain and Dupuis, 2011

  • The participatory analysis of the timeline became a vehicle for new reflections and interpretations on the course of participants' lives.

    “Although the drawing itself produced brief information in its own right (Pain and Francis, 2003), the participatory analysis became a vehicle for new re fl ections and interpretations on the course of my participants ' lives (Sheridan, Chamberlain, and Dupuis, 2011).”

    From Back in Time? A Temporal Autobiographical Approach to Afghan Return Migration (2025) · cites this paper as Sheridan, Chamberlain, and Dupuis, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheridan, J., Chamberlain, K., & Dupuis, A.
Affiliations
Massey University (NZ)
Venue
Qualitative Research
Published
2011-10
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
552-569
ISSN
  • 1468-7941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3109
OpenAlex
W2003414629
Cited by
225
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Qualitative Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative research in health
Keywords
visual methods, temporal narratives, weight loss, adiposity, narrative research, researcher-participant relationship, time in research, participant experiences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review