Cited by 915Contemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesQualitative Research Methods and Applications

Interpretive Interactionism

Denzin, Norman·2001·Sage eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412984591

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study used investigator triangulation to ensure methodological rigour.

    “Two members of the research team coded transcripts independently, using line by line analysis. This coding was guided by the project's overarching focus on children's experiences of domestic violence and abusive control, how they coped with it, and their capacity for agency and resistance. Once independent coding was completed, codes were compared and discussed by the research team, to facilitate”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denzin, N.
Corresponding author
Denzin, Norman
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
2001
OpenAlex
W4231235451
Cited by
915
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 33
FWCI
13.64
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Keywords
interpretive interactionism, interpretive sociology, interactionism, social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review