Cited by 362Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative MethodsQualitative Research Methods and Applications

Researching the researcher-as-instrument: an exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity

Open access
Pezalla, Anne E, Pettigrew, Jonathan, Miller-Day, Michelle·2012·Qualitative Research

Abstract

Because the researcher is the instrument in semistructured or unstructured qualitative interviews, unique researcher characteristics have the potential to influence the collection of empirical materials. This concept, although widely acknowledged, has garnered little systematic investigation. This article discusses the interviewer characteristics of three different interviewers who are part of a qualitative research team. The researcher/interviewers - and authors of this article - reflect on their own and each other's interviews and explore the ways in which individual interview practices create unique conversational spaces. The results suggest that certain interviewer characteristics may be more effective than others in eliciting detailed narratives from respondents depending on the perceived sensitivity of the topic, but that variation in interviewer characteristics may benefit rather than detract from the goals of team-based qualitative inquiry. The authors call for the inclusion of enhanced self-reflexivity in interviewer training and development activities and argue against standardization of interviewer practices in qualitative research teams.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1468794111422107

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pezalla, A. E., Pettigrew, J., & Miller-Day, M.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Qualitative Research
Published
2012-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
165-185
ISSN
  • 1468-7941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3109
OpenAlex
W4319307929
Cited by
361
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
50.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA021670)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Keywords
interviewer characteristics, qualitative interviews, interviewer training, narrative elicitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review