Cited by 23Child Development and Digital TechnologyLiteracy, Media, and EducationEducational Methods and Impacts

Children’s digital play as collective family resilience in the face of the pandemic

Open access
Burke, Anne, Kumpulainen, Kristiina, Smith, Caighlan·2023·Journal of Early Childhood Literacy

Abstract

In this article we explore how digital play as conducted through various social media and online meeting platforms facilitated resiliency and confidence building in children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using day-in-the-life methodology and narrative inquiry, we disseminate and examine observations collected on children aged 2-10 during lockdown in a Newfoundland neighbourhood. Children utilized platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, and Zoom to embrace their agentic digital play in ways that repurposed the platforms to fulfil life milestones and social needs otherwise impacted and disrupted by pandemic restrictions. Through a series of vignettes and interviews, our research not only examines how such digital play benefits children and their healthy development, but how parents reacted to and assisted with their children’s agentic digital platform manipulation and how this provided positive benefits and enriching experiences to the entire family. We additionally explore the conflicts and tensions both children and parents encountered in securely implementing free play via digital platforms, including fears of excess screen-time, digital dependency, and online threats, all of which risk limiting children’s ability to independently explore their creativity and identities through digital play if not handled sensitively. Despite the hurdles to implementing digital play, this study exposes why it is essential for families to navigate this online terrain; this study ultimately poses that digital play and online platforms not only were beneficial to maintaining and building family resilience during the pandemic but will be vital assets in sustaining resiliency and positive mindsets moving forward with pandemic recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14687984221124179

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three studies did not administer any questionnaire but conducted unstructured interviews with subjects or a descriptive analysis.

    “while three studies did not administer any questionnaire but conducted unstructured interviews with the subjects or a descriptive analysis [75–77].”
  • Burke et al. found that with the use of TikTok, children were more able to share activities, create a platform for their creative expression, and engage in new and alternative forms of digital play.

    “They found that with the use of TikTok, children were more able to share activities, create a platform for their creative expression, and engage in new and alternative forms of digital play.”
  • Ten studies differentiated the population between active and passive users, while only one conducted a content analysis of posts, hashtags, or videos.

    “Given that, ten studies differentiated the population between active and passive users [42, 67, 70, 72, 74–79], while only one conducted a content analysis of the posts, hashtags, or videos [78].”
  • Four of the included studies assessed wellbeing indicators, like creativity, innovation, life satisfaction, and health habits, while sixteen assessed mental disorder indicators such as depression, anxiety, stress or body image issues.

    “Four of the studies [68, 75, 79, 80] assessed wellbeing indicators, like creativity, innovation, life satisfaction, and health habits, while sixteen assessed mental disorder indicators such as depression, anxiety, stress or body image issues [42, 67, 68, 70–73, 76–79, 81–85].”
  • Except for the study by Burke et al., most included articles indicated an overall negative impact of TikTok on the mental health of adolescent users.

    “Except for the study by Burke et al. [75], most included articles indicated an overall negative impact of TikTok on the mental health of adolescent users.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, A., Kumpulainen, K., & Smith, C.
Affiliations
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Burke, Anne
Venue
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy
Published
2023-02-28
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
8-34
ISSN
  • 1468-7984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2919
OpenAlex
W4322622925
Cited by
23
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
16.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Early Childhood Literacy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
Keywords
children's digital play, family resilience, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, social media, TikTok, YouTube, Zoom, parental mediation, screen time, digital dependence, online risks, children's agency, early childhood, family well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review