CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Cultural Heritage Management and PreservationCultural Identity and HeritageArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reclaiming heritage and citizenship: urban pre-colonial cultural heritage management and heritage grassroots organizations in Lima, Peru

Open access
Alexandrino Ocaña, Grace·2023·Journal of Social Archaeology
DOI 10.1177/14696053231189947
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The material-centered cultural heritage management approach does not contemplate ordinary people’s closeness to heritage. Even after colonial relationships ended, colonial conceptions of what constitutes heritage drove national policy choices and state interventions regarding which elements of local history and culture should be valued and preserved and which could be destroyed and abandoned. Government rejection of non-elite populations and their connections to urban heritage resulted in the irrevocable destruction of important sites and traditions. But the rise of what I term heritage grassroots organizations (HGROs) has recently begun to reassert low-income and working-class citizens’ role in the recognition and preservation of heritage. Focusing on the emergence of HGROs in Lima, Peru, this article demonstrates how colonial heritage narratives formed, persisted, and have more recently been challenged by local populations whose daily lives are affected by materialist approaches to heritage. In doing so, these citizens simultaneously claim their rights to the past and to the city.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14696053231189947

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Ayala P, 2003, Chungará, 35, 379
  2. Cobo P, 1882, Historia de la Fundación de Lima
  3. Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación del Perú, 2003, Informe Final de la Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación
  4. Congreso de la República del Perú, 1893, Decreto Supreme Adoptando Medidas para Conservar los Materiales de la Historia Primitiva del país
  5. Congreso de la República del Perú, 1929, Ley 6634 Creando el Patronato Nacional de Arqueología. 6634
  6. Consejo de Indias, 1973, Recopilación de Leyes de los Reynos de las Indias
  7. Contraloría General de la República, 2015, CONTROL. Boletín Institucional, 33, 3
  8. de Albornoz C, 1990, El Retorno de las Huacas: Estudios y Documentos Sobre el Taki Onqoy, 43
  9. de Arriaga P, 1920, La Extirpación de la Idolatría en el Perú
  10. Delibes R, 2012, Desenterrando Tesoros en el Siglo XVI: Compañias de Huaca y Participación Indígena en Trujillo del Perú
  11. Díaz-Caballero J, 1986, Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana, 59, 81
  12. El Comercio, 2012, El Dominical
  13. Fuentes J, 2007, Boletín Tukuy Rikuq, 4, 16
  14. Gareis I, 1898, Boletín del Instituto Riva-Agüero, 16, 55
  15. INC (Instituto Nacional de Cultura)/Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima, 1985, Inventario de Monumentos Arqueológicos del Perú
  16. INEI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática), 1995, Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI) del Peru
  17. Itier C, 2021, Chungará (Arica), 53, 480
  18. Lefebvre H, 1996, Writings on Cities, 147
  19. Manzano J, 1973, Historia de las Recopilaciones del Archivo de Indias
  20. Méncias J, 2009, Khana, Revista Municipal de Culturas, 51, 1
  21. Ministerio de Cultura del Perú, 2020, Política Nacional de Cultura al 2030
  22. Municipalidad de Lima, 2021, Presupuesto Participativo
  23. Presidencia de Consejo de Ministros del Perú, 1997, Decreto Supremo No 028-97-PCM
  24. Rodriguez L, 2011, Boletin de Antropologia Americana, 47, 153
  25. Sanders K, 1997, Nación y Tradición: Cinco Discursos en Torno a la Nación Peruana
  26. Taylor G, 2015, Choque Amaru y Otros Cuentos Nuevos: Siete Relatos Sobre la Campana de Extirpacion de las Idolatrias en el Arzobispado de Lima, Siglo XVII
  27. Tello J, 1967, Arqueológicas. Publicaciones del Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, 10, 49
  28. Yamada G, 2010, Migración Interna en el Perú
  29. Yánez N, 2011, Puruchuco: Ni el tajo ni el olvido, 215

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Alexandrino Ocaña, G.
Affiliations
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
ORCID
Alexandrino Ocaña, Grace
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2023-07-22
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
303-325
ISSN
  • 1469-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2951
DOI
10.1177/14696053231189947
OpenAlex
W4385147103
Cited by
17
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Journal of Social Archaeology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
heritage management, cultural heritage preservation, low-income communities, citizenship, cultural heritage destruction, Lima

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review