The relative benefits found for students with and without learning disabilities taking a first-year university preparation course
Abstract
Positive outcomes have been reported for university preparation courses for students without disabilities. Little is known about whether these courses can offer the same benefit to students with learning disabilities and whether the inclusion of psychosocial factors, in addition to academic skills, would benefit both groups. First-level students with and without learning disabilities were tested on variables known to influence academic performance at the beginning and end of a university preparation course. Results revealed that students entering university with and without learning disabilities have similar challenges. Both groups showed increases in attentiveness, and academic and general resourcefulness after the course. Students with learning disabilities experienced greater gains in academic self-efficacy in comparison to their non-disabled peers. The study showed benefits in including psychosocial measures in a university preparation course, and that integrating students with learning disabilities into the course could help to alleviate the limited resources of disabilities programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research extending to students with a disability/ND students is limited by its minor representation from those with disability, or its conflation across differing disability experiences.
“This is an important contribution as research extending to students with a disability/ND students is limited by its minor representation from those with disability (see Barton et al., 2021;Reed et al., 2011), or its conflation across differing disability experiences (Reed et al., 2015).”
From Neurodivergent (Autism and ADHD) student experiences of access and inclusion in higher education: an ecological systems theory perspective (2025) · cites this paper as Reed et al., 2011
Cites
Reed, M. J., Kennett, D. J., Lewis, T., Lund‐Lucas, E., Stallberg, C., & Newbold, I. L. (2009) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360903067013 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationKennett, D. J., & Reed, M. J. (2009) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803610902804382 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Academic procrastination and academic performance: Do learning disabilities matter?
Goroshit, M., & Hen, M. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00183-3 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Butcher, L., & Lane, S. (2025) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01319-6 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“This is an important contribution as research extending to students with a disability/ND students is limited by its minor representation from those with disability (see Barton et al., 2021; Reed et al., 2011), or its conflation across differing disability experiences (Reed et al., 2015).”
- Authors
- Reed, M. J., Kennett, D. J., Lewis, T., & Lund-Lucas, E.
- Affiliations
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- Trent University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Trent University, Ontario, Canada,
- Venue
- Active Learning in Higher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-20
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-142
- ISSN
- 1469-7874 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2625
- OpenAlex
- W2119335715
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Active Learning in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Faculty of Arts, Ryerson University
- Trent University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Keywords
- learning disabilities, first-year students, academic self-efficacy, resourcefulness, attentiveness, psychosocial factors, academic performance, disability support programs, inclusive education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review