Cited by 35Disability Education and EmploymentHigher Education Research StudiesMathematics Education and Programs

The relative benefits found for students with and without learning disabilities taking a first-year university preparation course

Reed, Maureen J., Kennett, Deborah J., Lewis, Tanya, Lund-Lucas, Eunice·2011·Active Learning in Higher Education

Abstract

Positive outcomes have been reported for university preparation courses for students without disabilities. Little is known about whether these courses can offer the same benefit to students with learning disabilities and whether the inclusion of psychosocial factors, in addition to academic skills, would benefit both groups. First-level students with and without learning disabilities were tested on variables known to influence academic performance at the beginning and end of a university preparation course. Results revealed that students entering university with and without learning disabilities have similar challenges. Both groups showed increases in attentiveness, and academic and general resourcefulness after the course. Students with learning disabilities experienced greater gains in academic self-efficacy in comparison to their non-disabled peers. The study showed benefits in including psychosocial measures in a university preparation course, and that integrating students with learning disabilities into the course could help to alleviate the limited resources of disabilities programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469787411402483

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research extending to students with a disability/ND students is limited by its minor representation from those with disability, or its conflation across differing disability experiences.

    “This is an important contribution as research extending to students with a disability/ND students is limited by its minor representation from those with disability (see Barton et al., 2021;Reed et al., 2011), or its conflation across differing disability experiences (Reed et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reed, M. J., Kennett, D. J., Lewis, T., & Lund-Lucas, E.
Affiliations
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • Trent University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Trent University, Ontario, Canada,
Venue
Active Learning in Higher Education
Published
2011-06-20
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
133-142
ISSN
  • 1469-7874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2625
OpenAlex
W2119335715
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Active Learning in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Faculty of Arts, Ryerson University
  • Trent University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
Keywords
learning disabilities, first-year students, academic self-efficacy, resourcefulness, attentiveness, psychosocial factors, academic performance, disability support programs, inclusive education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review