The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustaining critical minds: How classroom learning cultures shape student thinking dispositions and practices
Open accessAbstract
Critical thinking is routinely identified as a goal for student learning in higher education. Critical thinking, however, is difficult to define or teach, often left as an educational aspiration that is challenging to operationalize and assess. Therefore, many interventions targeting critical thinking are isolated and tend to focus on the development of cognitive skills, providing less attention to students’ dispositions toward applying these skills to different situations. In this study of a redesigned course at a research-intensive university, we query what a dispositional view of thinking can reveal about students’ understanding and experience in an active learning environment. Drawing on student reflection journals and semi-structured interviews with 13 students from two cohorts of the course, we trace how students decide when and how critical thinking is necessary and suitable, as well as when it is perceived to be too demanding or out of place in the classroom. The course included newly introduced, ill-structured problems aimed at competency development. We note that although students employed many critical thinking skills to complete these tasks, the uncertainty related to applying critical thinking to ill-structured problems often conflicted with students’ expectations of classroom instruction. When adapting to unfamiliar instructional practices, students were largely successful in using different approaches to solve problems. However, students’ sensitivity to error a…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In higher education, classroom expectations, habits and cultural norms can pose barriers (Darcie et al., 2024;Sagy et al., 2019;Yusuf et al., 2024).”
From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Darcie et al., 2024
Citations
Cites
Aston, K. J. (2024) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874231168341 · Cited by 58
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Abrami P. C. Bernard R. M. Borokhovski E. Wade A. Surkes M. A. Tamim R. Zhang D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 78(4) 1102–1134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084 · DOI · Paper page
- Andreucci-Annunziata P. Riedemann A. Cortés S. Mellado A. Del Río M. T. Vega-Muñoz A. (2023). Conceptualizations and instructional strategies on critical thinking in higher education: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Education 8 Article 1141686. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1141686 · DOI
- Bendixen L. D. Rule D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist 39(1) 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_7 · DOI
- Bezanilla M. J. Fernández-Nogueira D. Poblete M. Galindo-Domínguez H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity 33 Article 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584 · DOI
- Braun V. Clarke V. Hayfield N. Terry G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In Liamputtong P. (Ed.) Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103 · DOI · Paper page
- Chan C. K. Y. Lee K. K. W. (2021). Reflection literacy: A multilevel perspective on the challenges of using reflections in higher education through a comprehensive literature review. Educational Research Review 32 Article 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100376 · DOI
- Coulson D. Harvey M. (2013). Scaffolding student reflection for experience-based learning: A framework. Teaching in Higher Education 18(4) 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752726 · DOI
- Darcie I. Vander Kloet M. Gray R. (2025). Finding your feet in the dark: How making teaching and learning visible enables change in course and assessment design. European Journal of Higher Education 15(2) 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2301599 · DOI
- Dunne G. (2018). The dispositions of critical thinkers. Think 17(48) 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477175617000331 · DOI
- Dwyer C. P. (2017). Critical thinking: Conceptual perspectives and practical guidelines. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316537411 · DOI
- ESU. (2015). Bologna with student eyes 2015: Time to meet the expectations from 1999. ESU European Students’ Union.
- ESU. (2020). Bologna with student eyes 2020. ESU European Students’ Union.
- Facione P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1–23.
- Gila K. Ela P. (2015). On the flip side of the coin: Thinking dispositions in learning blogs. American Journal of Educational Research 3(1) 16–19. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-1-4 · DOI
- Gunawardena M. Wilson K. (2021). Scaffolding students’ critical thinking: A process not an end game. Thinking Skills and Creativity 41 Article 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100848 · DOI
- Guo L. (2022). How should reflection be supported in higher education? A meta-analysis of reflection interventions. Reflective Practice 23(1) 118–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1995856 · DOI
- Hailikari T. Virtanen V. Vesalainen M. Postareff L. (2022). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education 23(3) 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160 · DOI
- Halpern D. F. Dunn D. S. (2022). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025412 · DOI
- Huber C. R. Kuncel N. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 86(2) 431–468. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917 · DOI
- Jackson K., Bazeley P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Ku K. Y. L. Ho I. T. (2010). Dispositional factors predicting Chinese students’ critical thinking performance. Personality and Individual Differences 48(1) 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.015 · DOI
- Møller T. E. Kvarøy S. Hannisdal B. (2023). Students’ response to the introduction of active learning and computational practices in a bachelor-level earth science course. Nordic Journal of STEM Education 7(1) 15–26. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsteme.v7i1.4827 · DOI
- Perkins D. N., Jay E., Tishman S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21.
- Perkins D. Ν. Ritchhart R. (2004). When is good thinking? In Dai D. Y. Sternberg R. J. (Eds.) Motivation Emotion and Cognition (pp. 351–384). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610515 · DOI
- Puig B. Blanco-Anaya P. Bargiela I. M. Crujeiras-Pérez B. (2019). A systematic review on critical thinking intervention studies in higher education across professional fields. Studies in Higher Education 44(5) 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586333 · DOI
- Rabello-Mestre A., Otondo F. (2021). Creative dispositions: Teaching for creativity in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(4), 915–924.
- Radović S. Firssova O. Hummel H. G. Vermeulen M. (2023). Improving academic performance: Strengthening the relation between theory and practice through prompted reflection. Active Learning in Higher Education 24(2) 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874211014411 · DOI
- Saldaña J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- Salgado Ramírez A. García Mendoza L. Y. Méndez-Cadena M. E. (2020). La experiencia del estudiantado mediante el uso del diario. ¿Una estrategia para la metacognición? Revista Educación 44 1–34. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.38291 · DOI
- Stanovich K. E. (2002). Rationality, intelligence, and levels of analysis in cognitive science: Is dysrationalia possible? In Sternberg R. J. (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid. (pp. 124–158). Yale University Press.
- Thorndahl K. L. Stentoft D. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking and problem-based learning in higher education: A scoping review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28773 · DOI
- Thorpe M. (2000). Encouraging students to reflect as part of the assignment process: Student responses and tutor feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education 1(1) 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787400001001006 · DOI
- Tishman S. Jay E. Perkins D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice 32(3) 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543590 · DOI
- Wangensteen S. Johansson I. S. Björkström M. E. Nordström G. (2010). Critical thinking dispositions among newly graduated nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(10) 2170–2181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05282.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Determining Factors for the Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education
Jaramillo Gómez, D. L., Álvarez Maestre, A. J., Parada Trujillo, A. E., Pérez Fuentes, C. A., Bedoya Ortiz, D. H., & Sanabria Alarcón, R. K. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13060059 · Cited by 50
“An educational environment that encourages active participation and uncertainty-based learning can compensate for economic inequalities and provide spaces where students develop more complex reasoning strategies (Darcie et al. 2024; Liu and Pásztor 2023).”
Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
Gillette, M., Wackenhut, A., & Olsson, E. (2026) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/yf2gt848 · Cited by 1
“In higher education, classroom expectations, habits and cultural norms can pose barriers (Darcie et al., 2024; Sagy et al., 2019; Yusuf et al., 2024).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Darcie, I., Gray, R., & Vander Kloet, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- University of Bergen, Norway
- Corresponding author
- Darcie, Isabela
- Venue
- Active Learning in Higher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-12-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 543-556
- ISSN
- 1469-7874 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2625
- OpenAlex
- W4404978206
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Active Learning in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- critical thinking, thinking dispositions, ill-structured problems, active learning, student reflection, competence development, course redesign, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustaining critical minds: How classroom learning cultures shape student thinking dispositions and practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/14697874241303508
- The paper
- Darcie, I., Gray, R., & Vander Kloet, M. (2025). Sustaining critical minds: How classroom learning cultures shape student thinking dispositions and practices. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874241303508