The Multicultural Muse: Culture, Creativity and Innovation
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between culture and creativity and innovation. It critically reviews the literature in which cross cultural differences in approaches to creativity and innovation are discussed. It first examines how creativity is conceptualized differentially across cultures and how social structural factors account for differences in creativity and innovation. Evidence for the impact of culture on cognitive style and personality as related to creativity and innovation is covered next. Finally, it addresses directly the relationship between cultural values and creativity/innovation. The article draws the following conclusions: (1) culture can and does impact on creative and innovation processes, but the relationship should not be considered universalistically, simplistically or unreflexively; (2) there is insufficient evidence to enable definitive statements to be made about systematic differences across cultures in personality or cognitive style with respect to creativity; (3) creativity and innovation are complex psychosocial processes involving numerous salient factors of which culture is but one; (4) the weight of evidence suggests that the relationship should be viewed contingently and in subtle and nuanced ways. A contingent view suggests that there are different processes, mechanisms, and structures through which creativity and innovation emerge. Cultures are creative and innovative within the context of their own systems and the exigencies and c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The desire to create something new and different is universal across cultures.
“The desire to create something new and different seems to be universal.”
From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Westwood & Low, 2003
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619 · see citing works
(1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195076165.001.0001 · Cited by 3,069 · see citing works
Earley, P. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256525 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Lumsdaine, E., & Lumsdaine, M. (1995) · IEEE Potentials · doi:10.1109/45.464655 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts
Erez, M., & Nouri, R. (2010) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00191.x · Cited by 263 · see citing works
- Authors
- Westwood, R., & Low, D. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Westwood, Robert
- Low, David R.
- ORCID
- Low, David R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cross Cultural Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-259
- ISSN
- 1470-5958 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2838
- OpenAlex
- W1986445607
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Cross Cultural Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Keywords
- creativity, innovation, cross-cultural comparison, cultural values, cognitive style, personality, social structure, contingency theory, multiculturalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review