Cited by 239Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceCultural Differences and ValuesGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management

The Multicultural Muse: Culture, Creativity and Innovation

Westwood, Robert, Low, David R.·2003·International Journal of Cross Cultural Management

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between culture and creativity and innovation. It critically reviews the literature in which cross cultural differences in approaches to creativity and innovation are discussed. It first examines how creativity is conceptualized differentially across cultures and how social structural factors account for differences in creativity and innovation. Evidence for the impact of culture on cognitive style and personality as related to creativity and innovation is covered next. Finally, it addresses directly the relationship between cultural values and creativity/innovation. The article draws the following conclusions: (1) culture can and does impact on creative and innovation processes, but the relationship should not be considered universalistically, simplistically or unreflexively; (2) there is insufficient evidence to enable definitive statements to be made about systematic differences across cultures in personality or cognitive style with respect to creativity; (3) creativity and innovation are complex psychosocial processes involving numerous salient factors of which culture is but one; (4) the weight of evidence suggests that the relationship should be viewed contingently and in subtle and nuanced ways. A contingent view suggests that there are different processes, mechanisms, and structures through which creativity and innovation emerge. Cultures are creative and innovative within the context of their own systems and the exigencies and c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14705958030032006

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westwood, R., & Low, D. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Westwood, Robert
  • Low, David R.
Venue
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management
Published
2003-08
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
235-259
ISSN
  • 1470-5958 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2838
OpenAlex
W1986445607
Cited by
239
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Keywords
creativity, innovation, cross-cultural comparison, cultural values, cognitive style, personality, social structure, contingency theory, multiculturalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review