Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 45Team Dynamics and PerformanceConflict Management and NegotiationGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence and Political Processes in Cyberspace: The Case of Global Virtual Teams

Elron, Efrat, Vigoda-Gadot, Eran·2006·International Journal of Cross Cultural Management

Abstract

The ways team members choose to influence each other and the political processes that take place within the team have important implications for the team’s effectiveness. We present an exploratory investigation of the ways both phenomena occur in global virtual teams. Based on interviews with team members and managers, combined with existing knowledge of these processes, we present a preliminary model that includes familiarity, team centrality and task focus as variables mediating the relationship between the multicultural and virtual aspects of the teams and the use of influence and politics. Our findings also suggest that the use of hard influence tactics and political actions is milder in global virtual teams in relation to collocated teams.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1470595806070636

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Bacharach, S. B., 1980, Power and Politics in Organizations
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511489785 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/256391 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199703)18:2<159::AID-JOB795>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00012-7 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/job.244 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/017084068800900202 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24008-3 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/1556384 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/256337 · DOI
  11. Elron, E., Academy of Management Meeting
  12. Elron, E., 2003, The Psychology of the Peacekeeper, 261
  13. Erez, M., 1993, Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  14. 10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.658 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/001872678203501004 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/256490 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/001872679604900206 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/014920639201800107 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0090-2616(91)90072-H · DOI
  20. 10.2307/255429 · DOI
  21. Gibson, C. B., 2003, Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, 59
  22. 10.2307/2667088 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/001872679404700903 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/job.181 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hinds, P. J., 2003, Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, 59
  26. 10.4135/9781483325392.n9 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/135943297399141 · DOI
  28. 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.2307/258459 · DOI
  30. 10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.440 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S1572-0977(01)08021-9 · DOI
  32. Kunda, G., 1992, Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-tech Corporation
  33. 10.1177/0146167295218002 · DOI
  34. Logan, G. D., 1989, Unintended Thought, 52
  35. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490155 · DOI
  36. McKenney, J. L., 1992, Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, 262
  37. 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.645 · DOI
  38. 10.5465/amr.1977.4406753 · DOI
  39. 10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200 · DOI
  40. 10.4337/9781845428235.00027 · DOI
  41. Mintzberg, H., 1983, Power In and Around Organizations
  42. Nohria, N., 1992, Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, 288
  43. 10.1177/014920639502100505 · DOI
  44. Pfeffer, J., 1992, Managing With Power
  45. 10.1007/BF03184886 · DOI
  46. 10.1145/265684.265696 · DOI
  47. Sagiv, L., 2006, ‘Cultural Dimensions of Teams: The Role of Value Composition’
  48. 10.2307/1556376 · DOI
  49. Schein, E. H., 1985, Organizational Culture and Leadership
  50. 10.1177/1470595802002002250 · DOI
  51. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490259 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0147-1767(79)90016-6 · DOI
  53. 10.1023/A:1020807700478 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/0022022199030002006 · DOI
  55. 10.1177/1059601105275266 · DOI
  56. Ting-Toomey, S., 1999, Communicating across Cultures
  57. 10.1177/009102600002900203 · DOI
  58. 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1742 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/00187267015411004 · DOI
  60. 10.1002/job.160 · DOI
  61. Vigoda-Gadot, E., 2003, Developments in Organizational Politics: How Political Dynamics Affect Employee Performance in Modern Work Sites, 10.4337/9781035304974 · DOI
  62. 10.4337/9781847201874 · DOI
  63. Wang, C. L., 2005, Management International Review, 45, 3
  64. 10.2307/256593 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1287/orsc.10.6.777 · DOI
  66. Yukl, G., 1990, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416, 10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.416 · DOI
  67. 10.1111/1464-0597.00124 · DOI
  68. 10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.309 · DOI
  69. 10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.525 · DOI

Cited by

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Elron, E., & Vigoda-Gadot, E.
Affiliations
  • Tel Hai Academic College (IL)
  • The University of Haifa, Israel
Venue
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management
Published
2006-12
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
295-317
ISSN
  • 1470-5958 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2838
OpenAlex
W1985735341
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Keywords
influence tactics, political behavior, virtual teams, global teams, multicultural teams, task focus, familiarity, collocated teams, team effectiveness, cyberspace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.