Cited by 26Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Family caregivers’ involvement in decision-making processes regarding admission of persons with dementia to nursing homes

Open access
Larsen, Lill Sverresdatter, Blix, Bodil Hansen, Hamran, Torunn·2020·Dementia

Abstract

The current Western health policy of ageing in place relies on a triad collaboration among patients, healthcare service providers and family caregivers. Such collaborations presuppose involvement in a vague juridical landscape. This article explores family caregivers’ experiences with involvement in and influence on nursing home decision-making processes for persons with dementia. The data consist of 12 in-depth interviews with family caregivers. Using positioning theory, we demonstrate how family caregivers strive to balance their assumed duty to care for the person with their needs to care for themselves. Their involvement (or non-involvement) in the complex decision-making process is demonstrated through the following seven positions: (1) self-condemning determiner, (2) dominant, (3) proponent, (4) saluting, (5) pending, (6) prisoner, and (7) stooge. Furthermore, we discuss why expedient positions are more available for some individuals and the consequences of family caregivers’ various positions on the healthcare policy aims of collaboration and equal healthcare services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1471301218814641

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregivers often experienced conflicts between systemic pressures and the care needs of their loved ones, with some expressing concerns that local health care services excessively relied on them to continue caring, leading to feelings of exploitation.

    “Caregivers often experienced conflicts between systemic pressures (e.g., lack of funding for services) and the care needs of their loved ones, with some caregivers expressing concerns that local health care services excessively relied on them to continue caring, leading to feelings of exploitation (Ashbourne et al., 2021; Larsen et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larsen, L. S., Blix, B. H., & Hamran, T.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Larsen, Lill Sverresdatter
Venue
Dementia
Published
2018-11-23
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
2038-2055
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W2900493510
Cited by
26
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
family caregivers, nursing home admission, decision-making, caregiver involvement, aging in place, positioning theory, caregiver self-care, collaborative care
MeSH terms
Aged, Decision Making, Dementia, Family, Humans, Nursing Homes, Patient Admission, Caregivers, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review