Cited by 70Technology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The use of digital technologies by people with mild-to-moderate dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A positive technology perspective

Open access
Talbot, Catherine V, Briggs, Pam·2022·Dementia

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A growing body of research has shown that people with dementia are using digital technologies to enhance lived experience. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought new digital opportunities and challenges and so provides a unique opportunity to understand how people with dementia have adapted to this new digital landscape. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 people with dementia and analysed thematically. We generated five themes, showing how participants used digital means to combat the stresses of the pandemic by facilitating social connection, self-actualisation, enhanced well-being and by assisting with activities of daily life. These technologies helped to reduce isolation, provide access to support groups, create opportunities for cognitive stimulation and self-development, and engendered a sense of identity at a time of perceived loss. Despite these benefits, participants also reported challenges regarding cognitive fatigue and usability issues. We recommend that training on how to use digital technologies is co-produced with people with dementia and designers engage with the voices of people with dementia throughout the design process. In turn, this could promote the social connectedness, well-being and self-worth of people with dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14713012221079477

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With adequate support, the older population of various capacities can adapt to using different technologies.

    “These findings have aligned with emerging evidence that with adequate support, the older population of various capacities can adapt to using different technologies (Peek et al., 2019; Talbot & Briggs, 2022).”

    From Facilitators and Barriers to Using Virtual Reality and its Impact on Social Engagement in Aged Care Settings: A Scoping Review (2023) · cites this paper as Talbot & Briggs, 2022

    The Conclusion reports that participants with mild-to-moderate dementia adapted their use of several digital technologies, and the Discussion says they could learn technological skills but often needed training. The Limitations section cautions that most participants were relatively young and had young-onset dementia, so the study does not establish the claim for older people across various capacities. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Aguirre E. Woods R. T. Spector A. Orrell M. (2013). Cognitive stimulation for dementia: A systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness from randomised controlled trials. Ageing Research Reviews, 12(1), 253– 262. 10.1016/j.arr.2012.07.001 22889599 · DOI
  2. Astell A. (2006). Technology and personhood in dementia care. Quality in Ageing: Policy, Practice and Research, 7(1), 15– 25. 10.1108/14717794200600004 · DOI
  3. Baldwin C., & Bradford Dementia Group. (2008). Narrative (,) citizenship and dementia: the personal and the political. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(3), 222– 228. 10.1016/j.jaging.2007.04.002 · DOI
  4. Bartlett R. (2016). Scanning the conceptual horizons of citizenship. Dementia, 15(3), 453– 461. 10.1177/1471301216644114 27170592 · DOI
  5. Beard R. L. Fox P.J. (2008). Resisting social disenfranchisement: Negotiating collective identities and everyday life with memory loss. Social Science & Medicine, 66(7), 1509– 1520. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.024 18222581 · DOI
  6. Beaunoyer E. Dupéré S. Guitton M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(6), Article 106424. 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424 32398890 PMC7213963 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brankaert R. Kenning G. Welsh D. Foley S. Hodge J. Unbehaun D. (2019). Intersections in HCI, design and dementia: Inclusivity in participatory approaches. In DIS’19 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 companion, San Diego, CA, June 23–28, 2019 (pp. 357- 360). 10.1145/3301019.3319997. on · DOI
  8. Clare L. Rowlands J. M. Quin R. (2008). Collective strength: the impact of developing a shared social identity in early-stage dementia. Dementia, 7(1), 9– 30. 10.1177/1471301207085365 · DOI
  9. Clare L. Wu Y-T. Jones I. R. Victor C. R. Nelis S. M Martyr A. Quinn C. Litherland R. Pickett J. A. Hindle J. V. Jones R. W. Knapp M. Kopelman M. D. Morris R. G. Rusted J. M. Thom J. M. Lamont R. A. Henderson C. Rippon I. Matthews F. E. (2019). A comprehensive model of factors associated with subjective perceptions of “living well” with dementia: findings from the IDEAL study. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 33(1), 36– 41. 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000286 30802227 PMC6416010 · DOI
  10. Craig D. Strivens E. (2016). Facing the times: A young onset dementia support group: Facebooktm style. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 35(1), 48– 53. 10.1111/ajag.12264 27010874 · DOI
  11. Dixon E. Lazar A. (2020). Approach matters: Linking practitioner approaches to technology design for people with dementia. In Chi ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu HI, April 25–30, 2020 (pp. 1– 15). 10.1145/3313831.3376432 PMC7383934 32719832 · DOI
  12. Duggan S. Blackman T. Martyr A. Van Schaik P. (2008). The impact of early dementia on outdoor life: a ‘shrinking world. Dementia, 7(2), 191– 204. 10.1177/1471301208091158 · DOI
  13. Gaggioli A. Villani D. Serino S. Banos R. Botella C (2019). Positive technology: designing e-experiences for positive change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1571. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01571 31338053 PMC6629820 · DOI
  14. Gerritsen D. L. Kuin Y. Nijboer J. (2014). Dementia in the movies: the clinical picture. Aging & Mental Health, 18(3), 276– 280. 10.1080/13607863.2013.837150 24063359 · DOI
  15. Giebel C. Cannon J. Hanna K. Butchard S. Eley R. Gaughan A. Komuravelli A. Shenton J. Callaghan S. Tetlow H. Limbert S. Whittington R. Rogers C. Rajagopal M. Ward K. Shaw L. Corcoran R. Bennett K. Gabbay M. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 related social support service closures on people with dementia and unpaid carers: a qualitative study. Aging & Mental Health, 25(7), 1– 8. https://doi.org/1080/13607863.2020.1822292 32954794
  16. Giebel C. M. Challis D. J. Montaldi D. (2016). A revised interview for deterioration in daily living activities in dementia reveals the relationship between social activities and wellbeing. Dementia, 15(5), 1068– 1081. 10.1177/1471301214553614 25280491 · DOI
  17. Giebel C. Pulford D. Cooper C. Lord K. Shenton J. Cannon J. Gabbay M. Tetlow H. Limbert S. Callaghan S. Whittington R. Rogers C. Komuravelli A. Rajagopal M. Eley R. Downs M. Reilly S. Ward K. Gaughan A. Gabbay M. (2021). COVID-19-related social support service closures and mental well-being in older adults and those affected by dementia: a UK longitudinal survey. BMJ open, 11(1), Article e045889. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045889 PMC7813330 33455941 · DOI
  18. Haslam S. A. Jetten J. Waghorn C. (2009). Social identification, stress and citizenship in teams: A five-phase longitudinal study. Stress and Health, 25(1), 21– 30. 10.1002/smi.1221 · DOI
  19. Joddrell P. Astell A. J. (2016). Studies involving people with dementia and touchscreen technology: A literature review. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 3(2), e10. 10.2196/rehab.5788 28582254 PMC5454556 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Johannes N. Vuorre M. Przybylski A. K. (2021). Video game play is positively correlated with well-being. Royal Society Open Science, 8(2), 202049. 10.1098/rsos.202049 33972879 PMC8074794 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Jootun D. McGhee G. (2011). Effective communication with people who have dementia. Nursing Standard, 25(25), 40– 47. 10.7748/ns2011.02.25.25.40.c8347 21469475 · DOI
  22. Kannaley K. Mehta S. Yelton B. Friedman D. B. (2019). Thematic analysis of blog narratives written by people with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias and care partners. Dementia, 18(7–8), 3071– 3090. 10.1177/1471301218768162 29642716 PMC6027602 · DOI
  23. Kerssens C. Kumar R. Adams A. E. Knott C. C Matalenas L. Sanford J.A. Rogers W. A. (2015). Personalized technology to support older adults with and without cognitive impairment living at home. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 30(1), 85– 97. 10.1177/1533317514568338 PMC4819239 25614507 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Langdon S. A. Eagle A. Warner J. (2007). Making sense of dementia in the social world: A qualitative study. Social Science & Medicine, 64(4), 989– 1000. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.029 17156905 · DOI
  25. Lazar A. Edasis C. Piper A. M. (2017). A critical lens on dementia and design in HCI. In CHI ’17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver Colorado, May 6–11, 2017 (pp. 2175– 2188). 10.1145/3025453.3025522 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Madjaroff G. Mentis H. (2017). Narratives of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and their caregivers. In Assets ’17: Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCES Conferences on Computers and Accessibility, Baltimore, MD, 20 October 2017–1 November 2017 (pp. 140– 149). 10.1145/3132525.3132554 · DOI
  27. Martyr A. Clare L. (2012). Executive function and activities of daily living in Alzheimer’s disease: A correlational meta-analysis. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 33(2–3), 189– 203. 10.1159/000338233 22572810 · DOI
  28. Martyr A. Nelis S. M. Quinn C. Rusted J. M. Morris R. G. Clare L. (2019). The relationship between perceived functional difficulties and the ability to live well with mild-to-moderate dementia: Findings from the IDEAL programme. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(8), 1251– 1261. 10.1002/gps.5128 31034650 PMC6767698 · DOI
  29. Neal D. Berg F. D. V. Planting C. Ettema T. Dijkstra K. Finnema E. Dröes R. M. (2021). Can use of digital technologies by people with dementia improve self-management and social participation? A systematic review of effect studies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(4), 604. 10.3390/jcm10040604 33562749 PMC7915697 · DOI
  30. Nicholson J. McGlasson J. (2020). CyberGuardians: Improving community cyber resilience through embedded peer-to-peer support. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM designing interactive systems conference, Eindhoven Netherlands, July 6–10, 2020 (pp. 117– 121).
  31. O’Philbin L. Woods B. Farrell E. M. Spector A. E. Orrell M. (2018). Reminiscence therapy for dementia: an abridged cochrane systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 18(9), 715– 727. 10.1080/14737175.2018.1509709 30092689 · DOI
  32. Oscar N. Fox P. A. Croucher R. Wenick R. Keune J. Hooker K. (2017). Machine learning, sentiment analysis, and tweets: An examination of Alzheimer’s disease stigma on Twitter. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 72(5), 742– 751. 10.1093/geronb/gbx014 28329835 · DOI
  33. Pérès K. Helmer C. Amieva H. Orgogozo J-M. Rouch I. Dartigues J-F. Barberger-Gateu P. (2008). Natural history of decline in instrumental activities of daily living performance over the 10 years preceding the clinical diagnosis of dementia: A prospective population-based study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(1), 37– 44. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01499.x 18028344 · DOI
  34. Post S. G. (2000). The concept of Alzheimer disease in a hypercognitive society. In Ballenger J. C. (Ed.), Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical and cultural perspectives. The John Hopkins University Press.
  35. Riva G. Mantovani F. Wiederhold B. K. (2020). Positive Technology and COVID-19. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(9), 581– 587. 10.1089/cyber.2020.29194.gri 32833511 · DOI
  36. Roach P. Drummond N. (2014). ‘It’s nice to have something to do’: Early-onset dementia and maintaining purposeful activity. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 21(10), 889– 895. 10.1111/jpm.12154 24841949 · DOI
  37. Royall D. R. Lauterbach E. C. Kaufer D. Malloy P. Coburn K. L. Black K. J. The Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association (2007). The cognitive correlates of functional status: A review from the committee on research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 19(3), 249– 265. 10.1176/jnp.2007.19.3.249 17827410 · DOI
  38. Ryan E. B. Bannister K. A. Anas A. P. (2009). The dementia narrative: Writing to reclaim social identity. Journal of Aging Studies, 23(3), 145– 157. 10.1016/j.jaging.2007.12.018 · DOI
  39. Smith S. K. Mountain G. A. (2012). New forms of information and communication technology (ICT) and the potential to facilitate social and leisure activity for people living with dementia. International Journal of Computers in Healthcare, 1(4), 332– 345. 10.1504/ijcih.2012.051810 · DOI
  40. Son J. S. Nimrod G. West S. T. Janke M. C. Liechty T. Naar J. J. (2020). Promoting older adults’ physical activity and social well-being during COVID-19 (pp. 1– 8). Leisure Sciences.
  41. Spreadbury J. H. Kipps C. (2019). Measuring younger onset dementia: What the qualitative literature reveals about the ‘lived experience’ for patients and caregivers. Dementia, 18(2), 579– 598. 10.1177/1471301216684401 28114802 · DOI
  42. Stuart A. Katz D. Stevenson C. Gooch D. Harkin L. Bennasar M. Sanderson L. Liddle J. Bennaceur A. Levine M. Mehta V. Wijesundra A. Talbot C. Bandara A. Price B. Nuseibeh B. (2022). Loneliness in older people and COVID-19: applying the social identity approach to digital intervention design. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 6, 100179. 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100179 35233473 PMC8872705 · DOI
  43. Sun R. Rieble C. Liu Y. Sauter D. (2020). Connected despite COVID-19: the role of social interactions and social media for wellbeing. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/x5k8u · DOI
  44. Talbot C. V. Briggs P. (2021). ‘ Getting back to normality seems as big of a step as going into lockdown’: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with early to middle stage dementia. Age and Ageing, 50(3), 1– 7. 10.1093/ageing/afab012 PMC7929391 33481988 · DOI
  45. Talbot C. O’Dwyer S. Clare L. Heaton J. Anderson J. (2020a). Identifying people with dementia on Twitter. Dementia, 19(4), 965– 974. 10.1177/1471301218792122 30081665 · DOI
  46. Talbot C. V. O’Dwyer S. T. Clare L. Heaton J. Anderson J. (2020b). How people with dementia use Twitter: A qualitative analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 112– 119. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Talbot C. V. O’Dwyer S. T. Clare L. Heaton J. (2021). The use of Twitter by people with young-onset dementia: A qualitative analysis of narratives and identity formation in the age of social media. Dementia, 20(7), 1– 16. 10.1177/14713012211002410 PMC8564236 33765848 · DOI
  48. Thomas B. (2017). Whose story is it anyway? Following everyday account of living with dementia on social media. Style, 51(3), 357– 373. 10.1353/sty.2017.0030 · DOI
  49. Weetch J. O’Dwyer S. Clare L. (2020). The involvement of people with dementia in advocacy: a systematic narrative review. Aging & Mental Health, 25(9), 1– 10. 10.1080/13607863.2020.1783512 32578451 · DOI
  50. Weintraub S. Wicklund A. H. Salmon D. P. (2012). The neuropsychological profile of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2(4), Article a006171. 10.1101/cshperspect.a006171 22474609 PMC3312395 · DOI
  51. Wiederhold B. K. Riva G. (2012). Positive technology supports shift to preventative, integrative health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 67– 68. 10.1089/cyber.2011.1533 22320253 · DOI
  52. Willis E. Semple A. C. de Waal H. (2018). Quantifying the benefits of peer support for people with dementia: a Social Return on Investment (SROI) study. Dementia, 17(3), 266– 278. 10.1177/1471301216640184 27013520 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Talbot, C. V., & Briggs, P.
Affiliations
  • Bournemouth University (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
Corresponding author
Talbot, Catherine V
Venue
Dementia
Published
2022-03-25
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
1363-1380
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W4220652509
Cited by
70
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 7
FWCI
25.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/MO23001/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
mild to moderate dementia, digital technologies, COVID-19 pandemic, positive technology, social connectedness, isolation, well-being, activities of daily living, cognitive stimulation, sense of identity, mental fatigue, usability, support groups
MeSH terms
Digital Technology, COVID-19, Dementia, Humans, Technology, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review